> * Roland Winkler [2011-11-26 02:28:12 -0600]:
>
> I agree that some compatibility mode could be useful.
I don't think so. A change from v2 to v3 is significant enough to require
an update in settings.
Also, any compatibility mode will have to be discontinued one day, and
then all the current is
On Sat Nov 26 2011 Philip Hudson wrote:
> Maybe I'll start with code doco, just standards compliance and
> formatting and filling in missing docstrings where I can. That'll help
> build the domain knowledge. Patches to the list, right?
You'd like to provide documentation patches that are suppo
On 26 Nov, 2011, at 8:28 am, Roland Winkler wrote:
> On Thu Nov 24 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Yet the main thing for me is: My time is limited for such things; I
> need to set up priorities. Currently I find it more important to
> have a more coherent documentation of the new code including a
>
On Thu Nov 24 2011 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > (defcustom bbdb-dwim-net-address-allow-redundancy nil
> [...]
> > So now there is
> > (defcustom bbdb-mail-avoid-redundancy nil
> [...]
> > define-obsolete-variable-alias would not be too helpful here.
>
> Agreed. But it would make a lot of sense to do
> (defcustom bbdb-dwim-net-address-allow-redundancy nil
[...]
> So now there is
> (defcustom bbdb-mail-avoid-redundancy nil
[...]
> define-obsolete-variable-alias would not be too helpful here.
Agreed. But it would make a lot of sense to do
(defcustom bbdb-mail-avoid-redundancy
(if (bou
> * Roland Winkler [2011-11-20 23:13:36 -0600]:
>
> On Sun Nov 20 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
>> as I said before, TRT is to use define-obsolete-function-alias &
>> define-obsolete-variable-alias
>
> This would require a simple one-to-one correspondence between
> function and variable names in BBDB
On Sun Nov 20 2011 Sam Steingold wrote:
> as I said before, TRT is to use define-obsolete-function-alias &
> define-obsolete-variable-alias
This would require a simple one-to-one correspondence between
function and variable names in BBDB v2 and v3 which is NOT the case.
A simple example from the
> * Roland Winkler [2011-11-20 17:52:40 -0600]:
>
> The new command bbdb-undocumented-variables might help you to
> identify outdated variables. This displays a list of all
> undocumented variables in the "bbdb-" name space.
this is a good start!
still, this does not give me any information about
The README file now gives an overview on how BBDB v3 interfaces with MUAs.
The new command bbdb-undocumented-variables might help you to
identify outdated variables. This displays a list of all
undocumented variables in the "bbdb-" name space.
All variables in BBDB 3 now have a doc string. So if
