This is directly supported by the label widget:
let w = GWindow.window ()
let l = GMisc.label ~packing:w#add ()
let () =
l#set_text "Hello";
l#set_use_markup true;
w#show ();
GMain.main ()
This is even shorter as optional argument:
let l = GMisc.label ~packing:w#add ~markup:"Hello" ()
J
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:29:08 +0100
Benedikt Meurer wrote:
> Speaking of the OCaml GC in general, wouldn't it make sense to
> replace the current generational collector with a collector framework
> that requires less copying in the common case.
Even without changing the GC algorithm, I think it
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 09:52:20PM +0100, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> > There should be three variants: pkg-config, OS-based userspace policy
> > (/usr/include vs. /usr/local/include) and user-defined one.
> >
>
> I think the pkg-config is the starting point, it also defines the prefix
> of the se
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:46:22PM +0300, Anastasia Gornostaeva wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:17:35PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
>
> > My current state about this solution is:
> > - defines BuildDepends: freetype2 (pkg-config), to make clear that there
> > is a C build-depends
>
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:17:35PM +, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> My current state about this solution is:
> - defines BuildDepends: freetype2 (pkg-config), to make clear that there
> is a C build-depends
> - allow to override the defined variable freetype2_cflags and
> freetype2_libs. If the
Le 29/11/10 12:44, oli...@first.in-berlin.de a écrit :
> yes.
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:25:52AM -, Jon Harrop wrote:
>> I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other
>> behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem!
Then, I do not know what you can do .
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:28 AM, bluestorm wrote:
> There was also a project by Chris King to develop a GUI based on lablgtk in
> a Functional Reactive Programming style.
> http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1918
Chris King's project was a major influence in the syntax I chose. I
started trying
Zitat von "Gerd Stolpmann" :
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Oliver Bandel:
Zitat von "Gerd Stolpmann" :
> Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb
> oli...@first.in-berlin.de:
>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
>> [...]
>> > The main
Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 17:12 +0100 schrieb Oliver Bandel:
> Zitat von "Gerd Stolpmann" :
>
> > Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb
> > oli...@first.in-berlin.de:
> >> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > The main problem was that ot
Zitat von "Gerd Stolpmann" :
Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb
oli...@first.in-berlin.de:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
[...]
> The main problem was that other languages have bigger standard
> libraries, whereas OCaml has a very small one (ju
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
>>
>> http://ruby-gnome2.sourceforge.jp/hiki.cgi?tut-gtk2-packing-tables-demo
>> http://plus.kaist.ac.kr/~shoh/ocaml/lablgtk2/lablgtk2-tutorial/x509.html
>
> I honestly don't see any difference. Where do you see "nice syntactic support
> for
Hi,
I'd like to have a "label" widget in Lablgtk with a string with
internationalization, bold, italic, utf8, color, things like that.
I am not sure, but I saw in the Web that I must use the function
"pango_parse_markup" and XML tags in my string, but that function
seems not to exist in Lablgtk.
Am Sonntag, den 28.11.2010, 19:14 +0100 schrieb
oli...@first.in-berlin.de:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 11:50:58PM +0100, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote:
> [...]
> > The main problem was that other languages have bigger standard
> > libraries, whereas OCaml has a very small one (just what is needed
> > to
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Adrien wrote:
>
> Something nice would probably be to share more extensions and wrappers
> around lablgtk. I've noticed Maxence Guesdon had made some available as
> stand-alone libraries but I'm not aware of others. Or maybe they're
> scattered around and it's hard
On 28/11/2010, Adrien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I'm concerned I've started experimenting with the concept of
> "tiling" (as used by tiling window managers) and zippers of horizontal
> and vertical boxes. That's pretty much what xmonad (window manager
> written in haskell) does. The zipper allows
On Nov 29, 2010, at 00:34 , Jon Harrop wrote:
> I see. Yes, that sounds like a great idea. How well does Immix cope with
> high allocation rates of short-lived objects? Been a while since I read the
> Immix paper...
In theory this should be handled more efficiently compared to a generational
co
yes.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:25:52AM -, Jon Harrop wrote:
> I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other
> behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem!
>
> Cheers,
> Jon.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr [ma
I assume he means one thread has one behaviour and another has the other
behaviour, in which case there certainly is a problem!
Cheers,
Jon.
> -Original Message-
> From: caml-list-boun...@yquem.inria.fr [mailto:caml-list-
> boun...@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Christophe Raffalli
> Sent:
18 matches
Mail list logo
