Hello,
I sent this message to chicken-janitors but it was rejected, so I'm
hoping that it's OK to post bug reports here as well.
BUG REPORT
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:48:26 -0500
From: Taylor Venable
To: chi
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:14:41PM -0500, Taylor Venable wrote:
> Using Chicken 3.5.0 on OpenBSD 4.5-beta I get segmentation faults when using
> the
> http egg. This occurs every time when a 404 or 500 error is generated by the
> http-server.
Happily, this seems to have been fixed
Hi all,
When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion. CPU
usage spikes, memory usage increases boundlessly, and no output is
ever produced. In Chicken 3.4.7 the file that when compiled triggers
this behaviour is u
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:45:10PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
> > x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recur
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 11:46:03PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> >
> > I have no direct evidence that it was an infinite recursion. It was
> > just a guess by the symptoms, but admittedly I have little knowl
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:19:56PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> >
> > The bug becomes more and more phantasmagorical!
> >
> > When initially compiling chicken-boot with "make PLATFORM=linux
> > DEBU
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:31:21PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> >
> > Well I was able to trigger a hang in my build with the debugging
> > symbols by setting the nursery stack size to 10k. ?Debug log from GDB
> &
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:09:41PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Well done, Taylor. Chicken coalesces all allocations inside a single
> generated C procedure and allocates it as one chunk. It seems here
> that the stack is already too small to hold the data, even after a minor
> GC was invoked.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:36:28PM -0400, Taylor Venable wrote:
> Since regex.c seems heavily involved in this last case, I've also put
> it on my website at: http://real.metasyntax.net:2357/tmp/regex.c.gz
Looking back at the changes log for the devel releases, I just noticed
tha
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:38:30AM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> Could you try to build chicken 4? (possibly twice, building the compiler
> with the compiler built from the bootstrap tarball - so that you are really
> testing the newest version and not some stale code in the bootstrapping
> tarb
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 12:17:20PM -0500, Lam Luu wrote:
> Do you know what is going on, and how to fix it?
I saw this also with the Chicken package on Ubuntu. If you compile
and install from source this shouldn't happen. (Don't worry, it's
quite painless to install from source.)
--
Taylor Chr
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 09:51:08AM +0100, Tobia Conforto wrote:
> Taylor Venable wrote:
>> When building Chicken 3.4.7 and higher (up to 3.5.2) on Ubuntu 8.10
>> x86_64 the chicken compiler goes into an infinite recursion.
>
> Excuse my ignorance, how do I check out a ver
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 08:48:50AM +0900, Ivan Raikov wrote:
> I doubt this is the case, since the regex unit is almost identical
> between Chicken 3 and Chicken 4. Taylor, can you compile Chicken with
> the attached regex.scm and see if there is any routine from the regex
> unit that is called a
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 04:31:24PM +0100, felix winkelmann wrote:
> I tested it on several systems (mingw(+msys), linux), but would
> appreciate if others could give it a try. Note that some minor
> recent trunk changes didn't make it, due to unclear portability.
On OpenBSD 4.5 x86:
Compiles both
ificant-prolog-token-1630] (ssax:scan-Misc633
port607) <--
-
I can't see the problem in my code, if there is one; I'm just starting
to work with this so any ideas are appre
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:03:58AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:10:14PM -0400, Taylor Venable wrote:
> > Error: unbound variable: ssax:scan-Misc
> >
> > I can't see the problem in my code, if there is one; I'm just starting
> &g
ot
necessarily the requested path.
In the meantime I've been using this code as a workaround to get what I
want regardless of the existence of files in the path:
(string-join (cdr (uri-path (request-uri (current-request "/" 'prefix)
Thanks for the clarification,
--
Tay
((string=? path "/asdf/jkl") ; s/uri/path/
>(y))
> (else
>(handle-other)
Where x and y do their own header setup, and write their own output.
--
Taylor Venable
http://metasyntax.net/
___
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 18:17 +0100, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:39:18AM -0500, Taylor Venable wrote:
> > The Spiffy documentation says about the value of handle-not-found: "It
> > is a procedure of one argument, the path (a string) that was requested."
&
Hi there, when loading bad code into the interpreter, I get warnings.
Is it possible to have line numbers printed for where these warnings
are triggered? Sometimes a message like "reference to possibly
unbound identifier: x" is hard to trace down if I use variable x a lot
in the code. Just to be
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote:
> I was wondering how to get Chicken to print cyclic structures
> using references to previous elements instead of looping, like
> this, for example (this is what Gauche does on the REPL, and
> what Guile's display implementation does):
>
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart <
mario.goul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those are bugs. The version indicated by the .setup file doesn't match
> the one indicated by the tag directory.
>
We had this problem with the packaging system I wrote for work; there we
have a scanning
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Taylor Venable wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:02 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart <
> mario.goul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Those are bugs. The version indicated by the .setup file doesn't match
>> the one indicated by the tag direc
Hi there!
I found this while writing some code for work earlier (I'm lucky enough to
be able to write testing programs in the language of my choice). I define a
class and a generic method in a module in a file, then load it into the
REPL. I can make an instance of that class, binding it to a varia
Hi there, I'm building a program with csc and it's running slower than I'd
hoped so I'm trying to do some profiling. I tried using the
-accumulate-profile option to concatenate information from multiple runs of
the program but it seems to produce the same result as just using -profile
(i.e. multipl
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 16:51, Peter Bex wrote:
> This imports module-a (which can be internal and nobody has to know it's
> there) both for syntax and normally, and then re-exports the convenience
> function.
Pardon the interruption, but I wanted to check for my own
understanding: is import-for-
26 matches
Mail list logo
