The Short answer is it can't be done.
You can have a Fractional T-1 with 56K or 64K,
but all 24 channels are ALWAYS there, you have just chosen to ignore some.
DDS 56K is different and not interoperable.
in order to interoperate, you need a channel bank to connect the 56K
and T-1 (one channel} to
Andy
L1 and L2 refer to the Dyxtra(sp.) Routing processes Running on the router.
In ospf, its one for each area the router is in.
In ISIS, its L2 if the router is connected to a router in another area(an
ABR), L1 if it is only connected to routers within its area, and L1/2 if it
needs to be awar
In your example, both RC and RE need to run both L1 and L2 processes.
Doyle would refer to them as L1/L2 routers.
So your second line would read:
L1 L1 L1/L2 L2 L1/L2 L1 L1
Since RD only connects to other routers that run L1/L2 SPF, it can choose to
be either L1 only, L2 only or both.
RC and R
"1. What is the two status on PVC mode ? In SVC, which have three status
(call setup , transfer and call terminate). "
I have seen 3 on both ATM and Frame Relay:
Active, inactive and deleted.
Active were circuits that are "up"
Inactive were VC's that were not configured on that router that are
d
Just a thought. Are you really running rip V1 or are you running Rip V2 in
compatibly mode.
The first config would look like:
Router Rip
Net 172.10.0.0
The second would look like:
Router rip
version 1
net 172.10.0.0
Just a thought.
Doug
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/r
Rich;
You are spot on that RS-232 is only spec’ed for 50 ft. However, I
have run RS-232 over 1000 ft at 9.6 kbps on wire that was not as good as
cat5. My advice is to try it first, at any reasonable length, and only
resort to active components if the tests fail. Just my experience.
Anthony, th
You are missing a default route to the internet.
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 206.107.237.x where x is the address of the cable
modem.
However if the 2521 can't see it, either somthing else is wrong.
Are the interfaces Up,Up?
A sh ip int bri should tell the tale on the 2501.
HTH
Doug
Message P
If you were running RIP V1 on your network,
correct design would dictate that all the local networks "must"
appear in the routing table of your routers.
If one of your users accesses a network not in the table,
the router would send an icmp "network unreachable" with no IP classless and
an icmp "t
Peter;
Spot on. NAT and a route.
Doug
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=7153&t=7102
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violat
Tom;
I think a discussion on this will be interesting.
My perseption is that a classful/classless router
has nothing to do with VLSM or CIDR.
The only issue is how it handles the default route
on networks that are attached to the router with at least one interface.
Classless - attached net, sub
Bruce;
Your Idea is as good as any.
The idea is to drop back to your CIR in times of congestion to avoid
dropping frames (and incurring re-transmits)
however, with 0 cir, there is no logical point to set it.
Set it lower and hope you drop less frames.
Personally, on a zero cir net, I would bag t
If you know this, please disregard.
T-1 crossovers, 56k and ethernet crossovers are all different.
I beleive its 1&2 to 4&5 for t-1
1&2 to 7&8 for DDS{56k}, CDDI, and ATM 25 and 155.
HTH
Doug
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=8112&t=8061
Dwayne;
The short answer is no.
If static routes sufice for your current IGP,
they will work for BGP as well.
The key is not to rely on BGP to provide reachability
within your AS. (network).
I would strongly concider creating loopback addresses
if you have multiple paths in your network.
this wi
Nul0 has several applications. Security is a good one.
Your point that martian routes can appear in the route table rather than
exception processes is also a good point.
It also is a good way to prevent routing loops on summary addresses, for
example.
Regards
Doug
Message Posted at:
http://ww
John;
IPX is very sensitive to delay variation. That is why you are dropping IPX
more than IP. My Novel expert recommends running an NWIP
tunnel if you have a novel server on each side. I know. Great.
Another tunnel.
The large number of differed packets could mean several things.
My first WA
Sean.
There is nothing wrong with your BGP configs.
Everything is working just the way you told it to. :)
What is wrong is your test methology.
Since 192.168.1.0 is unknown in As200,
you must do an extended ping on router 1 to router 3
with the loopback address as the source of the ping.
HTH
F
First, Congratulations.
My openion is the written exists to weed out people with NO experience. It
has no other value.
I would schedule my practical and get on with it.
Good Luck.
Doug
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=9735&t=9733
--
17 matches
Mail list logo