Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Mayo, Simer
Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other good alternatives for the 2900XL series? I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 file servers, 2 app servers and users

RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Marko Milivojevic
> Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > what are other > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? 3500XL Marko. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42693&t=42687 -- FAQ, list archive

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Steven A. Ridder
2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got EOL'd . -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Mayo, Simer"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are othe

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Michael L. Williams
I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is pushing the 2950 series is a "newer" alternative The 2950s feature Gig uplinks and 2900s don't Same with 3500s and 3550 (well the 3500's do have GBICs slots available, but I mean the same as far as Cisco pushing them as

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread nrf
Inline ""Michael L. Williams"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, The fixed-config ones have absolutely been discontinued http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca2900xl/prodlit/1421_pp.htm >however, I know Cis

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread nrf
""Marko Milivojevic"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > > what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > 3500XL Uh, are you sure? http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/si/casi/ca3500xl/

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread nrf
""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got > EOL'd . There is no such thing as a 2950XL or a 3550XL. The 'XL' designation only exists for the 2900 and the 3500. > > -- > > RFC 1

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)
On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: } } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series were discontinued on Nov. 1st, 2001. Next time, instead of "think"ing, go look at http://www.cisco.com/go/e

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Larry Letterman
the 2950 series has somewhat replaced the 2924xl. Larry Letterman Cisco Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Marko Milivojevic" To: Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687] > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL ser

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Ed Dial
Another thing to consider about the 2950's, which may or may not be important to you, is they do not support ISL. -Ed At 06:47 PM 4/26/2002 -0400, Michael L. Williams wrote: >I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is >pushing the 2950 series is a "newer" alternativ

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Adam Hickey
quot;Marko Milivojevic" To: Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 3:29 PM Subject: RE: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687] > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, > > what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > 3500XL > > Marko. Mess

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread nrf
""[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > } > } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is > > What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 2900XL series

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Michael L. Williams
First off, let me "pre-apologize" for my following statements to everyone in this group except Mr. Know It All (John Nemeth)... The following is slightly unprofessional, but well deserved. "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... >

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread Michael Williams
Michael L. Williams wrote: > no one can no everything And yes, after posting I realized that I misspelled "no" in the above sentence. I wanted to make it known that I made a mistake before Mr. Nemeth had a chance to chime in with a standard "yeah, well, learn how to spell..." posts. Mike W.

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-26 Thread MADMAN
Jeez John I can't wait to "know" everything like you!! Dave "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Nemeth)" wrote: > On Sep 16, 1:23pm, "Michael L. Williams" wrote: > } > } I don't think the 2900XLs are discontinuted, however, I know Cisco is > > What you think is irrelevant! The last of the 290

Re: Cisco 2900 XLs [7:42687]

2002-04-28 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The EOL URL referenced below is, in my opinion, one of the most incomplete "lists" on CCO. Use it as a starting point by all means, but don't rely on it to cover everything that has been EOL'd, because it doesn't. (Actually, it appears to be a little more complete now than it used to be - but