David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/12/2003 07:41:31 AM:
>
> --- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
> > also.
> > > I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to
using
> > > 1.4+ for
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Geir Magnusson
Jr writes:
>Don't forget that not all platforms have 1.4 or a mature 1.4 that
>people trust. it too a while for apple to get 1.4 out to OS X - I
>wouldn't use OS X in production of course, but it's my development
>platform...
Absolutely. J2SE 1
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Howdy,
Here is a recent TSS survey of J2EE containers that shows jdk levels
supported by different containers:
http://www.theserverside.com/reviews/matrix.jsp
Please be careful when relying on these -- for example, it doesn't have
tomcat 5. ;) I wish there was some sort of
On 30-Dec-03, at 22:08 Uhr, Phil Steitz wrote:
David Graham wrote:
There will always be users that will complain when changing Java
versions.
The only semi-valid reason I've heard to not upgrade to 1.4 is that
product X requires 1.3 and product X is expensive.
Where often "Product X" is a comm
Quoting Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The block on 1.4 remains the big-iron webservers, like Websphere and
> Weblogic. 1.4 as a requirement is a long way off yet IMHO.
>
FWIW, one of the major roadblocks for the app server vendors was that J2EE 1.4
(which in turn requires J2SE 1.4) w
that means OS
patches. For our OS/400 and S/390 customers this is a BIG
deal.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 09:07
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Moving up to JVM 1.4+
This has come up in regards to u
S upgrades. For new JRE versions, on certain OS's, that means OS
patches. For our OS/400 and S/390 customers this is a BIG deal.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 09:07
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: M
David Graham wrote:
There will always be users that will complain when changing Java versions.
The only semi-valid reason I've heard to not upgrade to 1.4 is that
product X requires 1.3 and product X is expensive.
Where often "Product X" is a commerical J2EE container (see below) and
what is "
The block on 1.4 remains the big-iron webservers, like Websphere and
Weblogic. 1.4 as a requirement is a long way off yet IMHO.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
> > I sa
On Dec 30, 2003, at 3:41 PM, David Graham wrote:
--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
also.
I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to
using
1.4+ for new versions.
Personally, I use JVM 1.4+, my
--- "Noel J. Bergman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net
> also.
> > I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to using
> > 1.4+ for new versions.
>
> Personally, I use JVM 1.4+, myself. However, everytime we do
t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 12:45 PM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Subject: Re: Moving up to JVM 1.4+
>
>Our current server (ActiveMath) is blocked entirely by JDK 1.4: it's a
>server with slightly too heavy memory requirements and the resu
Our current server (ActiveMath) is blocked entirely by JDK 1.4: it's a
server with slightly too heavy memory requirements and the result is...
OutOfMemoryError on most Unix-VMs if in JDK 1.4. (especially true on
MacOSX, very frequent on Sun and Blackdown's on Linux).
Hence the wish not to depend
> This has come up in regards to using some of java.nio in Commons/Net also.
> I say we leave the last release as 1.1 compatible and move on to using
> 1.4+ for new versions.
Personally, I use JVM 1.4+, myself. However, everytime we do a survey on
server-user, we get emphatic feedback from our us
14 matches
Mail list logo