Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-09 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Al Chou wrote: Would you move the existing ones into org.apache.commons.math.distributions.statistical or something so that the probability distributions could be organized together under *.probability? Also, I noticed that the current package uses the singular distribution rather than

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-09 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Al Chou wrote: OK, I see. The one thing I notice is that the names are getting awfully long, especially for the non-default case. I guess that's a price we pay for having descriptive (no play on words intended) names like DescriptiveStatistics Maybe the Implementations could be abbreviated

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-09 Thread Al Chou
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al Chou wrote: OK, I see. The one thing I notice is that the names are getting awfully long, especially for the non-default case. I guess that's a price we pay for having descriptive (no play on words intended) names like

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-09 Thread Al Chou
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al Chou wrote: Would you move the existing ones into org.apache.commons.math.distributions.statistical or something so that the probability distributions could be organized together under *.probability? Also, I noticed that the current

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-08 Thread Al Chou
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al Chou wrote: --- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-08 Thread Al Chou
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Al Chou wrote: --- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... 2.) Like in my last emails concerning Univariate I would like to, (and have done so in my checkout successfully) Make the following Class changes: interface

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-07 Thread Matt Cliff
I agree On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote: I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject would be good. 1.) o.a.c.math.stat.distributions --

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-07 Thread Al Chou
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject would be good. 1.) o.a.c.math.stat.distributions --

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-07 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Al Chou wrote: --- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject would be good. 1.) o.a.c.math.stat.distributions

Re: [math] Proposal for Package restructuring and Class renaming

2003-11-07 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Al Chou wrote: --- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have several modifications I'm planning to make, but in the spirit of consensus I want to propose them and attempt to get some agreement. So math developer opinions on the subject would be good. 1.) o.a.c.math.stat.distributions