Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>I agree.
>
>Dave
>
>On Tuesday 22 May 2001 19:38, you wrote:
>
>>michael wrote:
>>
>>>Groovy with me!
>>>
>>>Michael Brown wrote:
>>>
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>>>I think what he was talking about was... instead of
>>>going public with an i
I agree.
Dave
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 19:38, you wrote:
> michael wrote:
> >Groovy with me!
> >
> >Michael Brown wrote:
> >>On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
> >I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> >going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> >user/develop
I am thinking more of arround $100.00 a month.
Dave
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 16:02, you wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
> > > > I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> > > > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> > > > user/developer owned company with the
michael wrote:
>Groovy with me!
>
>Michael Brown wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
>>
>I think what he was talking about was... instead of
>going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
>user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
>into the company that
Groovy with me!
Michael Brown wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
> > > > I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> > > > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> > > > user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
> > > > into the company that you are
If mandrake opens to devloper investment I would be highly intrested. But
would of course need as much info as possible on the company before I would
deside anything for sure.
dave
(I am a US Citizen living and working in the UK)
On Tuesday 22 May 2001 08:45, you wrote:
> It appears from over
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln wrote:
> > > I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> > > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> > > user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
> > > into the company that you are also putting effort
> > > into.
> > Sounds like a g
On Monday 21 May 2001 11:45 pm, you stuttered :
> It appears from over here that they are dumping the
> expensive heads that they brought in specifically for
> a US ipo. If that is the case it is a good move since
> the time is not right for that. I hope that they don't
> become too provincial tho
It appears from over here that they are dumping the
expensive heads that they brought in specifically for
a US ipo. If that is the case it is a good move since
the time is not right for that. I hope that they don't
become too provincial though... it is good to have
input from various nationalities
On Monday 21 May 2001 08:29 pm, you stammered:
> Now this is sounding intresting
>
> Dave
>
> On Monday 21 May 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
> > > I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> > > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> > >
Now this is sounding intresting
Dave
On Monday 21 May 2001 12:03, you wrote:
> On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
> > I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> > going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> > user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
> > into t
On Sun, 20 May 2001, SI Reasoning wrote:
> I think what he was talking about was... instead of
> going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
> user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
> into the company that you are also putting effort
> into.
Sounds like a good idea to me. What is
I think what he was talking about was... instead of
going public with an ipo, have mandrake be a
user/developer owned company with the ability to buy
into the company that you are also putting effort
into.
--- Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So sprach John J. Allen am Sun, May 20, 2
So sprach John J. Allen am Sun, May 20, 2001 at 09:02:05PM +:
> With reference to your statement in relation to revenue, and hard times
> in relation to cash, would Mandrake consider a user/developer investment
> plan. I'd rather invest direct in Mandrake, than purchase a boxed set
> where a c
With reference to your statement in relation to revenue, and hard times
in relation to cash, would Mandrake consider a user/developer investment
plan. I'd rather invest direct in Mandrake, than purchase a boxed set
where a considerable portion of the revenue goes to the box makers,
box shifters et
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 04:45:47AM -0400, Yura Gusev wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
>
> > self-advertisements in the installer could be replaced with commercials
> > where users could 'click to receive more information when the install is
> > finished'. And upon completion of i
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Blue Lizard wrote:
> self-advertisements in the installer could be replaced with commercials
> where users could 'click to receive more information when the install is
> finished'. And upon completion of install, either in program but from
> hd or on first boot a message, we
Ok.. I've been toying with a software developement idea for the past few
months and this thread kind of brought it to the surface. The software I'm
writing is basically a web based front end for a rather complicated
database. Though it's targeted at a specific industry I believe it to be a
rather
Then why not partner with someone who is already
trying to do something like this. There are still a
few companies out there looking to make a name for
themselves... a partnership with Mandrake could be the
best of both worlds... as Mandrake can use its
strength of developing the software and its
>
>Well, I've done the donation thing. One idea I've had: is Mandrake going
>to be present at the Linux Expo in Birmingham, UK in September? If not,
>then I'll be there anyway, as part of a non-profit, Linux-in-education
>group with two demonstration machines running Mandrake, and I could
>possi
Bad idea...bad bad!
I would flee screaming
audio ads while booting up?
ads to annoy admins while installing computers (bad
target audience)
the problem now is that people are not paying much for
ads right now (mostly because they seem to think that
ads are only effective if clicked though...as opp
Once upon a time I spewed out about 32 million ideas to chmou and warly
about features for 80 81. I was on a whole lotta caffeine and about 12
days of coding. Included were ideas for sponsored ads in various places
where it would cost mandrake nothing. For instance, those useless
self-adver
Alexander Skwar wrote:
>
> So sprach SI Reasoning am Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:14:43PM -0700:
> > I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
> > run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
> > Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
> > checking is done by the community
So sprach SI Reasoning am Thu, May 17, 2001 at 10:14:43PM -0700:
> I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
> run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
> Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
> checking is done by the community the only thing
> Mandrake would
On 17 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situation,
> > > currently.
> > Other than the obvious (buying boxed sets, donating directly), what are
> > the ways that we can help generate extra income?
> Thanks :-).
> Actually I don't know
I don't see how the project I mentioned could not be
run that much differently than other Mandrake Open
Source projects... Since most of the coding and bug
checking is done by the community the only thing
Mandrake would be doing is getting the ball rolling as
another service diversificatio
In that case as when this happens with any company, money should focus on
advertising and sales and a bit to customer support and the research and
development of bug fixes.
It may just mean a shuffle of how the money flows internaly.
On Thursday 17 May 2001 18:01, you wrote:
> Brook Humphrey
Ill think on this may be there is way Mandrake can advertise cheaply or free
in some cases. Ill get back with you on this.
Dave
On Thursday 17 May 2001 20:32, you wrote:
> Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> [...]
>
> > > All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situati
Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > All IT and Linux companies seem to be facing the same situation,
> > currently.
>
> Other than the obvious (buying boxed sets, donating directly), what are
> the ways that we can help generate extra income?
Thanks :-).
Actually I don't know
On 17 May 2001, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> > > > I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> > > > within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> > > > and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
> > > > like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
> > > > web
Brook Humphrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 May 2001 07:07 am, you wrote:
> > SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> > > within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> > > and allowed for such things as photo g
Cash.
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Armisis Aieoln ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> What does mandrake need to make this a viable option?
> dave
>
> On Thursday 17 May 2001 15:04, you wrote:
> > SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> >
On Thursday 17 May 2001 07:07 am, you wrote:
> SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> > within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> > and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
> > like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have
What does mandrake need to make this a viable option?
dave
On Thursday 17 May 2001 15:04, you wrote:
> SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> > within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> > and allowed for such things as phot
SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
> like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
> web portal... with email , calender
SI Reasoning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
> within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
> and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
> like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
> web portal... with email , calender
I liked the drag and drop interface for moving files
within eazel services. What if Mandrake picked it up
and allowed for such things as photo galleries, etc
like Yahoo. Maybe Mandrake can have a linux enhanced
web portal... with email , calendering, etc... that
sync's with netscape, outlook, an
37 matches
Mail list logo
