On Friday 21 March 2003 23:27, Francisco Alcaraz Ariza wrote:
> If not the iso images, why not repair the buggy cooker that avoid the
> creation of runing isos?
>
I don't know what problems people have been having making .iso's but I have
been making DVD sized .iso's for absolutely ages; made on
On Sat, 2003-03-22 at 14:39, Sir Pingus wrote:
> > On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
> > > Now this is way off ...
> > >
> > > IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
> > > the official ISOs gets delivered ...
> > >
> > > They d
> On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
> > Now this is way off ...
> >
> > IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
> > the official ISOs gets delivered ...
> >
> > They don't get posted on the mirrors after a automated iso build,
>
On Sat 22 Mar 2003 03:19, Thomas Backlund posted as excerpted below:
> Now this is way off ...
>
> IIRC Warly (or another MDK employee) posted a message after 9.0 release how
> the official ISOs gets delivered ...
>
> They don't get posted on the mirrors after a automated iso build,
> instead they
Viestissä Lauantai 22. Maaliskuuta 2003 09:34, Duncan kirjoitti:
> On Fri 21 Mar 2003 05:56, Brian J. Murrell posted as excerpted below:
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 02:42:33PM +1200, Jason Greenwood wrote:
> > > Will 9.1 Final ISO's hit the mirrors??
> >
> > I would like to know this too.
> >
> > J
On Fri 21 Mar 2003 16:18, Phazeman posted as excerpted below:
> Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
> state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and it's
> not nice to let them wait so much time without knowing whats going on.
See my post to
If not the iso images, why not repair the buggy cooker that avoid the creation
of runing isos?
El Sábado, 22 de Marzo de 2003 00:18, Phazeman escribió:
> Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
> state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and i
Can someone from Mandrake please update the users and testers about the
state of the ISO images ? The people are very excited about it and it's
not nice to let them wait so much time without knowing whats going on.
Many thanks in advance.
Phazeman
> "B" == Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you
>> have a second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file
>> system on that machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or
>> HTTP)
>>
B> Of cou
If someone can point me at HTTP-accessible ISO images, I'd be happy
to register them with www.swarmcast.com -- it doesn't really matter
if the site has limited bandwidth since swarmcasting uses less
bandwidth as the demand rises.
--
Gary Lawrence Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: office voice/fax: 0
>
> Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> > It is unpacked in many places and you can install via ftp - but, for
> > those having slow connection, how do you imagine ftp install? (Just a
> > bit of math, how long do you need to transfer 150MB over 56Kb modem.
> > Even if it 56Kb?)
>
> Well, on my 33.6 kb mo
Op maandag 20 augustus 2001 15:20, schreef u:
> On 20 Aug 2001 20:53:08 -0400, Wim Horst wrote:
> > Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
> > thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
>
> yes, using hd.img. You will be prompted. This is a question for the
> ne
Borsenkow Andrej wrote:
> It is unpacked in many places and you can install via ftp - but, for
> those having slow connection, how do you imagine ftp install? (Just a
> bit of math, how long do you need to transfer 150MB over 56Kb modem.
> Even if it 56Kb?)
Well, on my 33.6 kb modem, I would expe
>
> I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you have a
> second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file system on that
> machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or HTTP)
>
"I do not think" or "I have tried and it failed"?
Of course you can. Using either ext2 or fat pa
I don't think you could install from the ISO image unless you have a
second machine (you can mount an ISO image as a file system on that
machine and then export it under NFS, FTP or HTTP)
For those of us on slow connections, and especially for those of us
who do not use even a small percent of th
--- Wim Horst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
> thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
>
Hello Win Horst!
How can you do that? Could you show me how to install directly from iso files
without burning them to CD-r?
TiA
On 20 Aug 2001 20:53:08 -0400, Wim Horst wrote:
> Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
> thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
>
yes, using hd.img. You will be prompted. This is a question for the
newbie (or expert if newbie is unsuccessful) list. It i
Is it possible to install directly from a iso image file,
thus without first burning a cd. I don't have a cdwriter.
ot; version
> >
> > thanks a lot.
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > From: marco goerlach[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2001 07:18
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECT
PROTECTED]
> > Sent: sexta-feira, 23 de fevereiro de 2001 07:18
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Cooker] iso images Beta 8.0
> >
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > Who can help me?
> > Here the situiation.
> >
> > I have down
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Cooker] iso images Beta 8.0
>
> Hello folks,
>
> Who can help me?
> Here the situiation.
>
> I have downloaded the cooker iso images 1-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso and
> 2-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso in the directory cooker.
>
> I ge
Hello folks,
Who can help me?
Here the situiation.
I have downloaded the cooker iso images 1-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso and
2-Cooker-i586-20010213.iso in the directory cooker.
I get a menu:
.
Please choose the partition where is copied the Linux-Mandrake
Distribution.
.
(0) cancel
Hello folks,
.
What must I do if I will install mandrake with iso images?
I get a error if the system want to install filessets from iso image 2.
.
with kind regards,
Marco
So what is the fix for the 34k first CD image? Is there a new mkcd.pl or are
there other fixes regarding the mirror tree?
Any help would be appreciated.
Chris
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 09:22:04AM +, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> As long as your rc1 inst image has the same name and is in the same place
> '$LOCALDIR' it should work. I don't have an earlier iso so I can't test
> that - I expect to be downloading most of this week - I'm currently at
> 26% of Man
On Sun, 29 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
> > <...>
> >
> > I run this from my crontab every 2 hours 20 minutes.
> > ##
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 01:19:35PM +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
> <...>
> > btinternet in their infinite something, drop the line every 2 hrs
> > and it's dynamic ip, not a problem when i use download
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, stephen wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
<...>
> btinternet in their infinite something, drop the line every 2 hrs
> and it's dynamic ip, not a problem when i use download 4 x
> netscape downloads need stopping and restarting.. pain
> what hap
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 10:36:44AM +0100, stephen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
> >
> > /localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
> >
> permission denied.
> unexpected EOF in read_timeout
>
> does this translate as busy, go away ??
translates a
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
>
> How about:
>
> rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
> /localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
>
>
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -av sunsite.uio.no::Mandrake-iso
receiving file list ... done
drwxr-xr-x8
stephen wrote:
> >
> [stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
>sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.iso \
> /home/stephen/Mandrake72-inst.iso --partial --progress --stats
>
> ERROR: The remote path must start with a module name
>
> I probably got the source path to file
On Sat, Oct 28, 2000 at 06:56:33AM +0100, stephen wrote:
> [stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
>sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.iso \
> /home/stephen/Mandrake72-inst.iso --partial --progress --stats
>
> ERROR: The remote path must start with a module name
You
On Wed, Oct 25, 2000 at 05:18:34PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
>
> > howabout
> >
> How about:
>
> rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
> /localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
>
[stephen@zmemw16 stephen]$ rsync -avv
sunsite.uio.no::/pub/unix/Linux/Mandrake/iso/Mandrake72-inst.
> howabout
>
> xdelta delta -9 beta3.iso rc1.iso beta_2_rc1_upgrade.gz
>
How about:
rsync -av remote.mirror.site::/path/to/iso
/localpath/to/iso --partial --progress --stats
this will do effectively what diff does, and only brings down what is
required. ie if the file is the same in many place
Is it relevant as to how the two data streams are compressed, we are
interested in compressing the difference stream.
might be to a pure maths type person, bit beyond mine
howabout
xdelta delta -9 beta3.iso rc1.iso beta_2_rc1_upgrade.gz
assuming xdelta can handle 640M files ;-)
it's been tru
Ron Stodden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2a all RPMs come already compressed
RPMs are cpio archive + a rpm header (requirements, what is providing,
description, date, version, changelog and the like).
They're not compressed.
most SRPMs content is compressed.
stephen wrote:
>
> Having only just finished downloading Beta3, the air became
> slightly colourful when as browsing email I saw RC1 mentioned,
> closely followed by a 'here we go again' feeling, my computer
> is definitely moving out of my bedroom.
>
> I should perhaps mention my modem, that's
stephen wrote:
> I should perhaps mention my modem, that's why I waited for
> a slightly longer lasting beta than 1 & 2 ;-)
>
> Questions::
> 1. Would a binary difference file be possible ?
> 2. Would it necessaryily be significantly smaller ?
> 2a. How would it compress ?
> 3. If it was say 20
Having only just finished downloading Beta3, the air became
slightly colourful when as browsing email I saw RC1 mentioned,
closely followed by a 'here we go again' feeling, my computer
is definitely moving out of my bedroom.
I should perhaps mention my modem, that's why I waited for
a slightly
39 matches
Mail list logo