Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 04:13:49PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > ? > > > > > > You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such . > > > > Bu

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread Graham Percival
Millions of electrons died to bring me this message. Was it worth it, Guillaume Cottenceau? > Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > > ? > > > > > > You should do a little bit of packaging before sayi

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread David Walluck
On 13 Oct 2000, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > 2. Do you know any distribution where they provide original source >unpatched? There are simply not, the aim of a distribution is to >provide some fixed (e.g. working) versions of the sources!!! Probably Slackware which is why I don't like th

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > > ? > > > > You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such . > > But he's right! Aren't there patches made by Mandrake in these packages? > So it is no

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread Alexander Skwar
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > ? > > You should do a little bit of packaging before saying such . But he's right! Aren't there patches made by Mandrake in these packages? So it is not the original source anymore. Alexander Skwar -- Homepag

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-13 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Mandrake doesn't use *any* official releases. > $ uname -r > 2.2.17-21mdksecure > > $ rpm -qa | grep glibc > glibc-2.1.3-16mdk > glibc-devel-2.1.3-16mdk > compat-glibc-5.3-2.0.7.9mdk > glibc-profile-2.1.3-16mdk > > > See those "-21mdksecure

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Graham Percival
Millions of electrons died to bring me this message. Was it worth it, Mattias Eriksson? > As I always have said, if you are just going to use it for cooker, and _never_ > do a release using this snapshot (you can call it what ever, but it's not a > official gcc release), I have no problems at a

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Mattias Eriksson
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our ne

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Jason Straight
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, you wrote: > Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we wi

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to > find a solution, and it wil

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Guillaume Cottenceau
Pixel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next releas

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Mattias Eriksson
At 12 October, 2000 Pixel wrote: > Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Pixel
Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. > > To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: > "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to > find a solution, and it will

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Mattias Eriksson
At 12 October, 2000 Thierry Vignaud wrote: > And as for us, we _never_ release a distro with gcc-2.96. To quote Guillaume Cottenceau: "if unfortunately gcc3 will not be out for our next release we will have to find a solution, and it will not be to revert to 2.95 for sure." Have you people at m

Re: [Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Thierry Vignaud
Mattias Eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, I have asked several times about when they plan to release gcc-3.0 and > haven't got one single reply that might even look like an answer to that. From > that I assume that people simply dont know. Still, they are claiming that we > must get prep

[Cooker] The gcc-2.96 stupidity!

2000-10-12 Thread Mattias Eriksson
Ok, I have asked several times about when they plan to release gcc-3.0 and haven't got one single reply that might even look like an answer to that. From that I assume that people simply dont know. Still, they are claiming that we must get prepaired for it! The fact that they don't have a clue