allot of the emails to the list have not been showing up for me. So I'm
testing my other email address to see if it works better.
--
New and improved with advanced outlook crash handler.
!--input type --
-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-~`'~-
Is this thing on? Tap, tap, tap.
I need my daily cooker fix.
--
Brant Fitzsimmons
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed.
Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being
self-evident.
-Arthur Schopenhauer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
sorry. please ignore
- --
http://tblx.net/encrypt/[EMAIL PROTECTED] for pgp key
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+d6RUsKWd3vub6wURAiF0AJ9gf1VL2iaeQavfkI20dcvxW3VLdwCdF3IR
EhLCWNJarCAxfDRMcxRvd3U=
=18lx
Few things,
1. Standard GUI Install
- keyboard selection blank on the Summary Screen,
- Printer install does not allow for Network Printers (expert does). Maybe it
should?
2. Expert GUI Install
- keyboard selection does show up in Summary Screen,
- tried minimal install with X and
Ok, that msg I sent 3 times is getting here with a corrupted
pgp signed message error...which is why it appears blank with
an attachment. I just tested with sending pgp signed emails to
other people and it's getting correctly to them, so...it either
was that
just testing to see if I got dropped or if cooker has gone missing.
Vox
--
Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind
of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_
technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr.
The pcmcia detection code has been synchronized with pcmcia-cs on
2002/08/29 (now, some cards are using yenta_socket but some
others still i82365); it's both in RC1 and RC2; since no one
reported a problem I suppose it works? - people who can do a
pcmcia install (e.g. install from a pcmcia disk,
Does this mean that WPC11 got added/fixed in the pcmcia-cs config file ?
Nothing else to tell to ISteam :)
testing please ignore
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi,
1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
online when started.
Probably temporary login problems but I see that
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 10.26, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 02:43:55PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi,
1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint.
I have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
online
fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
Ok, cool!
2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any
notifications that people sends these to me.
Let me check that.
I may get notifications if I examine the network window, I didn't check
that.
Yes. I cannot stress
On Thursdayen den 29 November 2001 11.59, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
fix, I might rebuild a new CVS one soon.
Ok, cool!
2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any
notifications that people sends these to me.
Let me check that.
I may get notifications if I
Hi,
1. Sometimes when starting up licq, it seems like I'm online, but I aint. I
have to manually go offline and then online. I have it configured to go
online when started.
2. Authorization Requests hangs licq. Also I never get any notifications
that people sends these to me.
--
Update user/all users hangs Licq.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current uptime with kernel 2.4.13-12mdksmp: 8 hours 41 minutes
| cpu0 @ 814.28 bm, fan
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't
work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
I think that there are still some direct connection issues with Licq.
Unfortunately. :-(
- G.
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server
don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
I think that there are still some direct connection
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:29:34PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 06.12, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:23:25PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server
don't work through my Linux 2.4
Es schrieb Geoffrey Lee:
These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8
one is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that,
there are several core issues:
- interaction with the server
Since I use your RPMs I can communicate again via the
On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
several core issues:
- interaction with the server
- interaction with other clients
- stability
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 07:59:42AM -0600, J.P. Pasnak wrote:
On Monday 26 November 2001 04:40, you wrote:
These experiences are important as I wish to know if the unsupported v8 one
is any better (or worse!) than the current cooker one. By that, there are
several core issues:
-
On Monday 26 November 2001 05:37, you wrote:
Strange. Are you sure? All protocol stuff should be done within the Licq
daemon, not the plugins.
OK, my bad. Reload V8, and console is working. Don't know what the
problem was last night
- URL sending still crashes client, otherwise
(1) verify for the cooker version
licq-1.0.4-0.5mdk.i586.rpm
(2) verify for the v8 version, if it's reproduceable, give me an an exact
test case, exactly as you type it (the aliases that you send to you can
subsitute something else, those shouldn't be too important.)
Hi,
It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8...
16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
v1.0.4/SSL].
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi,
It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8...
16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
v1.0.4/SSL].
That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support
On Mondayen den 26 November 2001 23.47, Geoffrey Lee wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 05:29:36PM +0100, Oden Eriksson wrote:
Hi,
It seems licq-1.0.4-0.5.V8.1mdk do not propagate itself as v8...
16:56:04: [SRV] Oden Eriksson (952113) changed status: Online (v6) [Licq
v1.0.4/SSL].
That's probably not such a good idea yet, given the minimal support that
we have.
Ok, got it.
I have done some small test here against several buddies of mine, and direct
messages do not work at all. I guess it's because one, or both parts is
behind forewalls.
Is there a list
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't
work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Oden Eriksson, Deserve-IT Networks, Jokkmokk, Sweden.
| Mandrake Linux release 8.2 (Cooker) for i586
| Current
le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server don't
work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
--
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/linux_wizard/index.html
-
C'est dans la marine qu'il y a le plus de
On Sundayen den 25 November 2001 19.58, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
le dim 25-11-2001 à 17:23, Oden Eriksson a écrit :
Direct messaging to icq ver. 2000b beta v 4.65 on win 2000 server
don't work through my Linux 2.4 firewall.
you open the right port ( 5190 ) ?
Everything is open
System mirrored and installed 5 minutes ago...
X works fine now, but this is what I obtain running XFdrake and many many
other application:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = it_IT:it,
LC_ALL = (unset),
Le Vendredi 14 Septembre 2001 16:17, Claudio scribit :
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = it_IT:it,
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_MESSAGES = it_IT@euro,
LC_TIME = it_IT@euro,
LC_NUMERIC =
]
Subject: [Cooker] testing LATEST cooker: disaster with locales I
suppose
System mirrored and installed 5 minutes ago...
X works fine now, but this is what I obtain running XFdrake and many
many
other application:
perl: warning: Setting locale failed
On Friday 14 September 2001 16:32, Fabrice FACORAT wrote:
Le Vendredi 14 Septembre 2001 16:17, Claudio scribit :
perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = it_IT:it,
LC_ALL = (unset),
LC_MESSAGES =
Hi
I have a partition of 5 GB, originally intended for test of Woody, but their
mail list is so picky about style and expertice, so I will try ext3 and other
file system.
My problem is that I have a Mdk 8.0, within which I do rsync, that has an
fstab that mounts this test partition. This
I have not seen anything from the list today, just testing it..
Jorg
Testing My apache server...
_
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
ACPI is still broken... Had to turn it off.
Well apart of some hangups with "aviplay", and probably due to its raw
alpha status, I have not seen any serious problems. I tested NFS, NCP
and SMB connections, kicking a few gigs in and out. Games work ok, both
OpenGL SDL based. There seems to
My mail wasn't going through to cooker... this is a test of a change in my
config
--
-
Tim McKenzie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
testing sending to list.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:18:33PM +0930, Allen Bolderoff wrote:
Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
I really want to be able to boot a loop mounted iso, and check that all the
hdlists and depslists files all got created correctly, any Ideas?
Yes, you can use the loop
Allen Bolderoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
you can try (in root)
cd Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/perl-install
./g_auto_install
and do the fake install to the point of choosing packages. Don't be afraid of
the diskdrake step, it won't touch the
arrgh,
my stupidity (it was late, and I am tired)
I want to try an install off of the loop mounted iso.
how do I test the install process in order to test that the hdlists are not corrupt?
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 07:18:31PM +0200, diablero rambled a bit about:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at
Thanks, That is what I wanted. :)
:wq
A
On 28 Apr 2000, Pixel wrote:
Allen Bolderoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a method of testing an ISO before burning?
you can try (in root)
cd Mandrake/mdkinst/usr/bin/perl-install
./g_auto_install
and do the fake install to the point
Chmouel Boudjnah a écrit :
Ron Rosenthal [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd like to test the beta, but I can't find an iso image, which would
make downloading 7.0 a lot easier. Can youhelp?
may i suggest you download the whole distribution and make your own
iso images.
simly download
Hi
I'd like to test the beta, but I can't find an iso image, which would
make downloading 7.0 a lot easier. Can youhelp?
Thanks.
Ron Rosenthal
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As a responsible user of e-mail for mass broadcasting, we filtered our e-mailing list
at OptList.com 24 hours before the transmission of this message. At which time, all
e-mail addresses registered at OptList.com with the preference to not receive
unsolicited e-mail were removed from our list.
48 matches
Mail list logo
