I know this isn't directly related to dbmail, but the people on the php-db
mailing list aren't being too helpful and I was wondering if anyone here
had any ideas.
I've been having an issue where php will drop the first four characters
from a POSTed form field when inserting/updating informatio
Michael Rose, Jr.
Office: (206) 686-7600
Fax: (206) 374-8126
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Micah Stevens
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2002 3:00 PM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: [Dbmail] Dropping characters.
I know thi
Use phpinfo(); to figure out if the missing four characters are being
lost in PHP or when you're doing the INSERT or UPDATE into mysql.
Also try doing the INSERT/UPDATE via the mysql command line.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
It's definitely something with the php interface. If I do anything at the
command line, with MySQL, it works fine.
I attached the phpinfo() output. I'm not sure how I'm supposed to directly
use that to figure out if the characters are being lost by PHP.
I did notice however, that after an att
Here's the attachment.
At 03:20 PM 9/23/2002 -0700, you wrote:
Use phpinfo(); to figure out if the missing four characters are being
lost in PHP or when you're doing the INSERT or UPDATE into mysql.
Also try doing the INSERT/UPDATE via the mysql command line.
Michael
-Original Message
Hi,
We have noticed that and make some tests with several Webmail and mail
clients as Netscape, Outlook, vs courier-imap with the same mail
clients.
First conclusions the PHPs' webmails are very slow except Squirrelmail
because it use its own imap libraries instead of PHP-IMAP. But it's true
Cour
Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
use '*' instead of stating field names are slower. If you don't specify the
field names the database has to spend time figuring out what they are, bu
I am trying to find the mailing list for amavisd-new-20020630. Anyone
know where I can find a list or contact for assistance getting this
program running?
--
Butch Evans
573-293-2638
BPS Networks
PO BOX 550
114 W Main
Bernie, MO 63822
Wouldn't it be part of the existing mailing list?
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
Michael Rose, Jr.
Office: (206) 686-7600
Fax: (206) 374-8126
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Butch Evans
Sent: M
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:48:33 -0700 in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Micah
Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
> basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
> use '*' instead of stating field na
On Monday 23 September 2002 11:28 pm, Michael Rose, Jr. wrote:
> Wouldn't it be part of the existing mailing list?
>
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
This is correct.
Bret.
--
Bret Baptist
Systems and Technical Support Specialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet Exposure, In
Micah Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
>basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
>use '*' instead of stating field names are slower. If you don't specify the
>field names the database has
Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record
size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big
messages in chunks.
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Przyswa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 3:52 PM
Subject: RE
eric ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>On Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:48:33 -0700 in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Micah Stevens
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Just a note, on your query comments, although I'm not arguing with your
>> basic point, it's always been my understanding that SELECT statements that
Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>Why use messageblks? Well, for one reason, mysql has a limit on the record
>size so a split-up is necessary anyway. The system was chosen to handle big
>messages in chunks.
>
Ok, I guessed that there is a good reason to do that, but it's possible to
The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
improvement; just don't know how much time will be involved in
implementing those.
Thi
Roel Rozendaal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrivait:
>
>The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
>better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
>fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
>improvement; just don't know how mu
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 10:48, Sam Przyswa wrote:
> >Unless your program is getting back the rows as name value pairs and picking
> through what gets sent back, you want to be specifying the columns and the
> order
> that they are to be sent back, not asking for everything and assuming that the
> o
Hello, community!
I tried using dbmail (it`s the single thing in area loging emails), but I had
some questions.
1. It`s very intresting for me to install dbmail on sendmail daemon.
2. It`s posible to put into DB not only input emails (for local users), but
output email?
3. And it`s posible to o
Honestly I don't think using "select " or "select *" is a big
speed difference - it's more like the ultimate fine tuning. I think
dramatic results can be achieved by developing a table layout/imap logic
that minimizes the number of queries and the amount of parsing done by
the imap server.
On Tue
Parsing is definitely the issue. I wrote a very simple Python application
to parse headers in my dbmail inbox - a run against 50 messages takes about
4 seconds on a very fast box, using standard Python libraries.
The question is, what's more important - message insertion or subsequent
processi
On 25/9/02 4:21 AM, "Roel Rozendaal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The basic layout for dbmail was based upon pop3 but we are interested in
> better schemes for imap. One of the main goals right now is to have the
> fastest imap server around. Better table layouts would mean a great
> improvement;
+ Purging deleted messages based on a time different:
Currently status is set to 03 meaning deleted. This allows the
dbmail-maintenance script to clear all deleted messages each night or
whenever the script is run. If this field could be changed to a timestamp
(or treated as a timestamp, where val
Just checking so I can brief our helpdesk, I'm assuming dbmail does not lock
the pop sessions to prohibit the same user from relogging in while another
session is active.
>From my tests, it looks like any destructive change (eg deleting a message
Status: O
is honoured immediately upon a client ex
24 matches
Mail list logo
