package octave2.9
severity 420080 important
merge 420079 420080
thanks
Sorry for filing the duplicated bug report (Olafur beated me by 6
minutes...). At least, there Thomas's comments and mine appear in the
second one.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: octave2.9
Version: 2.9.10-4
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-19 22:36]:
> Am Donnerstag, 19. April 2007 22:08 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > * Olafur Jens Sigurdsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-19 17:59]:
> > > Hi, I tried to install a f
* James Westby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 18:09]:
> On (17/04/07 02:27), Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > I see a problem with the above dependencies. Imagine the following
> > combination of packages in a given system:
> >
> > apache2 installed
> >
* Olafur Jens Sigurdsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 13:02]:
> I must say that I dont understand this bug report, it doesnt say
> anything specific about what is wrong with the package.
>
> The only problem I have with version 2.9.10 is that it does not
> include the path to the forge functio
package webcalendar
tags 407698 upstream patch
thanks
* Herbert P Fortes Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-20 15:08]:
> Package: webcalendar
> Version: 1.0.4-1.2
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using webcalendar with sqlite3. I had
> to edit 3 files to have it:
>
> - includes/php-dbi
r.php [1] and includes/xcal.php [2].
[1]
http://webcalendar.cvs.sourceforge.net/webcalendar/webcalendar/import_handler.php?view=markup
[2]
http://webcalendar.cvs.sourceforge.net/webcalendar/webcalendar/includes/xcal.php?view=markup
Thanks,
--
Rafael Laboissiere
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-19 09:44]:
> I am tagging this bug report "upstream". It may be that the bug is already
> fixed in the development version of WebCalendar. Could you please check
> the CVS version of edit_entry.php [1] to see if this is
package webcalendar
tags 407700 upstream
thanks
* Herbert P Fortes Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-20 15:09]:
> Package: webcalendar
> Version: 1.0.4-1.2
> Severity: normal
>
> It seems a common behavior to have a call to
> dbi_free_resutl() after called dbi_query(). The
> edit_entry.php file
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 11:14]:
> This one time, at band camp, Rafael Laboissiere said:
> > Is this feature under development? It would be great to be able to specify
> > dependencies like the following (note the parentheses):
>
> I know p
* Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 01:04]:
> This one time, at band camp, James Westby said:
> > That's not your job, the php maintainers have to ensure their packages
> > work, you just have to make sure enough php/mysql/apache stuff is
> > installed to work.
>
> Well, that's glossin
* Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 19:08]:
> How about dropping php4 support altogether?
That is probably a good option. Let us see what Elizabeth Bevilacqua and
the debian-mentors say.
Cheers,
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
package webcalendar
severity 393832 normal
merge 393832 419570
thanks
[Cc: to debian-mentors]
* Oleksandr Moskalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 11:13]:
> Package: webcalendar
> Version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
>
> webcalendar forces retention of php4 on the system. Depe
reopen 418503
close 415780 2.9.10-4
thanks
Relevant part of debian/changelog:
octave2.9 (2.9.10-4) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
* debian/in/control:
+ Changed relationship to gnuplot from Suggests to Recommends
(closes: #415780)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 21:49]:
> * Geraint Paul Bevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 15:56]:
>
> > I am only lurking and don't have a particularly strong opinion about
> > this, but "recommends" seems to make more sense
Package: webcalendar
Version: 1.0.5-1
Severity: important
This is actually a problem with the dbconfig-common package, see Bug#418479.
I ma reporting this against the webcalendar to note in the BTS that the
current bug is blocked by Bug#418479.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unst
* Joseph Hope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-13 10:29]:
> I'm not quite clear what this message means.
It was an ITP (Intention To Package) for the Debian distribution. I sent a
courtesy copy to xmds-devel just to keep you guys informed about it.
> Are you requesting an official release of the un
* G. Milde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-13 12:00]:
> IMO, it is a documentation issue. This change should be documented in the
> changelog. I did not find it in the Jed Version: 0.99.18 (Debian package
> jed 0.99.18-6)
>
> John, could you add this change to the changes.txt? Something like
>
>
* John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-12 15:15]:
> It was intended. evalfile is slang's lowest level file loading
> function, and as such it should not tamper with the name passed to it.
> For example, under Unix ~ is a perfectly valid directory name and it
> should be possible to load a f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmds-doc
Version : 0~svn.1321
Upstream Author : P.T. Cochrane, G. Collecutt, P.D. Drummond, and J.J. Hope
* URL : http://xmds.sourceforge.net/
* License
Package: dbconfig-common
Version: 1.8.31
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
While doing a torture test with the webcalendar package some days ago
(install / deinstall / purge / keep the database / install again / etc), I
ran into a problem with dbconfig-common. For some reason that I cannot
replicate n
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 15:18]:
> I think this is unfortunate since Octave is useful on its own without
> Octave Forge and I think 2.9.10 is much better than 2.9.9.
A not-so-unrelated question: currently, the virtual package called "octave"
in Debian depends on octave2.1.
package jed
tag 418529 - moreinfo
thanks
Thanks for the "moreinfo", Jörg (hence the removal of the tag).
* Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-11 10:32]:
> package jed
> tag 418529 - unreproducible
> thanks
>
> % xjed -batch -f '()=evalfile("~/.jed/latex.sl")'
> loading /usr/share/jed/jed-
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 15:18]:
> On 10-Apr-2007, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> | Package: octave2.9
> | Version: 2.9.10-4
> | Severity: grave
> | Justification: renders package unusable
> |
> | Octave 2.9.10 doesn't play well with the current octave2.9-forge packages in
> | De
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-10 18:57]:
> Am Dienstag, den 10.04.2007, 18:01 +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > * Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 01:01]:
> >
> > > I will try to update the package to 0.8.7 in the near future
* Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-04 01:01]:
> I will try to update the package to 0.8.7 in the near future.
Shouldn't we upload 0.8.7 to unstable, now that etch is released?
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
etc/jed.d/05jed-common.sl
loading /etc/jed.d/50jed-extra.sl
loading /usr/share/jed/jed-extra/libdir.sl
loading /usr/share/jed/jed-extra/ini.sl
loading /usr/share/jed/jed-extra/drop-in/ini.sl
loading /etc/jed.d/55jedstate.sl
loading /usr/share/jed/jed-extra/gdbmrecent.slc
loading /var/tmp/test.sl
/ho
make the webcalendar
package install correctly.
[1] The webcalendar package is being actually co-maintainied in Alioth,
see http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/webcalendar/
Thanks,
Rafael Laboissiere
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstabl
Package: php4, php5
Severity: minor
Both php4 and php5 packages have this sentence in their descriptions:
This package is a meta-package that, when installed, guarantees that you
have at least one of the four server-side versions of the PHP{4,5}
interpreter installed.
However, they d
* Hongzheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-05 23:50]:
> I also notice that the octave-forge provides a pkg mechanism now
> according to their faq and docs. And, of course, the pkg subsystem is
> not a compatible Debian style. But I think the new pkg method is not
> compulsory. I mean, octave
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 11:34]:
> Hi,
>
> Am Montag, den 02.04.2007, 17:41 -0400 schrieb John W. Eaton:
> > I expect that some 2.9.x version of Octave will be declared the
> > recommended version of Octave before GCC 4.3 (or maybe even GCC 4.2)
> > is released, so I don't
package octave2.9-forge
tags 417659 - pending
thanks
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 09:04]:
> * Hongzheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 10:55]:
> >
> > It seems that the API version of the oct files in this package
> > mismatc
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-03 22:38]:
> On 3-Apr-2007, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> | * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-02 23:48]:
> | > Does 2.9.10-3, the version currently in unstable also fail in the same
> | > way?
> |
package octave2.9
tags 417671 confirmed upstream patch fixed-upstream pending
thanks
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 11:11]:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.04.2007, 10:44 +0200 schrieb Kim Hansen:
> > Package: octave2.9
> > Version: 2.9.10-3.2
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: patch
> >
> >
package octave2.9-forge
tags 417659 confirmed pending
thanks
* Hongzheng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-04 10:55]:
> Package: octave2.9-forge
> Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-8
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that the API version of the oct files in this package
> mismatches the version o
* Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-02 22:27]:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 2.9.9-8etch1
> Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.3
>
> Your package fails to build with GCC 4.3. [snip]
Does 2.9.10-3, the version currently in unstable also fail in the same
way?
BTW, is there a web page with the da
Package: ftp.master.org
Severity: normal
Please, remove the glpk-shlib package. It has been superseded by the glpk
package, version 4.15 and later. The new glpk package produces the shared
libraries now, which are needed for building the octave2.{1,9} packages.
I used to be the maintainer of
# See http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/octave/trunk/debian/?rev=877&sc=1
tags 416046 pending
# See http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-octave/octave/trunk/debian/?rev=878&sc=1
tags 416431 pending
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 10:55]:
> On 28-Mar-2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> | package octave2.9-emacsen
> | tags 416431 upstream patch
> | thanks
> |
> | The bug report below was filed against the octave2.9 package in Debian.
> | Full
package octave2.9-emacsen
tags 416431 fixed-upstream
thanks
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 10:55]:
> On 28-Mar-2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> | package octave2.9-emacsen
> | tags 416431 upstream patch
> | thanks
> |
> | The bug report below was
package octave2.9
tags 416046 fixed-upstream
thanks
* John W. Eaton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-29 11:12]:
> On 28-Mar-2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> | package octave2.9
> | tags 416046 = upstream patch
> | thanks
> |
> | I am forwarding below a bug report
package octave2.9-emacsen
tags 416435 moreinfo
thanks
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:13]:
> Package: octave2.9-emacsen
> Severity: normal
>
> Also, the content of octave-help-files is set to ("octave"), it should
> be set to ("octave2.9"), the following solve it in .emacs
package octave2.9-emacsen
tags 416048 wontfix
thanks
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:05]:
> Package: octave2.9-emacsen
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> [snip]
>
> May I also ask for the use of update-alternatives to use the right
> versions of octave-inf and co ? There
Package: octave2.9-emacsen
Severity: normal
I am separating the request below from Bug#416049:
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:13]:
> Package: octave2.9-emacsen
> Severity: normal
>
> Also, the content of octave-help-files is set to ("octave"), it should
> be set to ("oct
Package: octave2.9-emacsen
Severity: normal
I am separating the request below fro Bug#416049:
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:13]:
> Package: octave2.9-emacsen
> Severity: normal
>
> Furthermore, the info-emacs-info and info-emacs-octave-help scripts are
> wrapper around
package octave2.9-emacsen
tags 416048 confirmed pending
thanks
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:05]:
> Package: octave2.9-emacsen
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Hello,
>
> I introduced in 2005 the following patch to octave-mod:
> --- octave-inf.el.orig 2005-08-22 11:
Package: octave2.9-emacsen
Severity: normal
I am filing this bug report in the behalf of Pascal A. Dupuis, because the
original bug report (#416048) concerned actually two unrelated bugs. The
relevant part of the report is:
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 12:05]:
> Package: o
package octave2.9
tags 416046 moreinfo
thanks
* Pascal A. Dupuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-24 11:55]:
> Package: octave2.9
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
> while trying to understand why the info mode didn't work as expected in
> octave2.9 running under emacs, I found that the required "progr
* Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-25 18:20]:
> On Sat, December 23, 2006 23:04, Fernando M. Maresca wrote:
> > Hi. Here is the function:
> > ###
> > function die_miserable_death ( $error ) {
> > global $TROUBLE_URL; echo "WebCalendar: Fatal
> > Error\n" .
> > "WebCalendar Error\n" .
>
* Geraint Paul Bevan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 15:56]:
> I am only lurking and don't have a particularly strong opinion about
> this, but "recommends" seems to make more sense to me.
>
> Even running a batch job from a terminal it is still usually desirable
> for the plot function to work c
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 13:16]:
> also sprach Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.22.1310 +0100]:
> > BTW, you probably forgot to send your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I did, bouncing.
Thanks. I reassigned this bug report to
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-22 12:10]:
> reopen 415736
> retitle 415736 please add support for VCard 2.1/ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE
> severity 415736 wishlist
> thanks
>
> also sprach Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.21.2318 +0100]:
* Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 15:59]:
> Seeing how gnuplot is the default plotting engine in Octave and the one
> that the Octave team works with the most, I think its priority as an
> octave dependence should be upgraded from suggests: to recommends:. I
> was quite sur
Package: libtext-vfile-asdata-perl
Version: 0.0.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Running the very simple script attached below results in the following:
$ ./test-text-vfile-asdata.pl
Base class package "Class::Accessor::Chained::Fast" is empty.
(Perhaps you need to
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 18:16]:
> also sprach Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.03.21.1743 +0100]:
> > Could you please send me the *.vcf file you used and tell me the exact steps
> > to replicate the bug. I would like to test it on
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 16:33]:
> Package: rolo
> Version: 011.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: normal
>
> rolo cannot read a VCard such as the attached one. I am not sure
> whether it's valid, it is generated by PalmOS.
There was no file attached. Could you please send it?
--
R
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-21 16:35]:
> Package: rolo
> Version: 011.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: important
>
> I try to delete a record on amd64, and the programme segfaults.
> strace is attached.
Could you please send me the *.vcf file you used and tell me the exact steps
to replic
* Ryo Furue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-20 12:24]:
> | What does this gives for you:
> |
> | grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg \
> | /var/lib/texmf/fonts/map/dvips/updmap/psfonts.map
> |
>
> $ grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2c/updmap.cfg
> ### From file: /etc/texmf/updma
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-20 10:32]:
> We should try to understand why in my system the *.pfb files are used, while
> they are ignored in yours. I have no clue where to start looking.
What does this gives for you:
grep tipa /var/lib/texmf/web2
* Ryo Furue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 23:14]:
> | Why is not "" getting included in the PS
> | file?
>
> I wish I knew. . . . I don't know if I'm answering your question,
> but the generated PS file contains a tipa10 bitmap:
>
> >>>
> %DVIPSBitmapFont: Fa tipa10 10
* Ryo Furue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-19 15:16]:
> Yes, although my dvips is from a different package from yours:
>
> >>>
> $ dvips mydoc.dvi -o mydoc.ps
> This is dvips(k) p1.7a Copyright 2005 ASCII Corp.([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> based on dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye
package tipa
tags 415407 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
* Ryo Furue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-18 23:13]:
> Package: tipa
> Version: 2:1.3-4
> Severity: normal
>
> Hi
>
> When I try to convert a DVI file using dvipdf, this happens:
>
> $ latex mydoc.tex
> . . . .
> $ dvipdf mydoc.dvi
>
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-09 14:31]:
> package myspell-pt-br
> tags 295985 moreinfo unreproducible
> thanks
>
> * Michel Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-19 12:01]:
>
> > The pt_BR.dic file has several repeated roots
> > e.g.
&
package octave-forge
tags 415341 upstream
thanks
* Tom Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-18 15:56]:
> The calculation in mapping/azimuth.m in both the 2.1 and 2.9 branches of
> octave-forge gives incorrect values. A correct version of the
> calculation is given at http://williams.best.vwh.ne
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.33
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
In the urwid UI, The yes_no questions are lacking a trailing question mark,
unlike the text UI. The patch below fixes this.
Rafael
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="jed"
DEBEMAIL="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
EMAIL="[EM
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.33
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
When using the urwid UI, the buttons column (at the left side) is too wide,
making the bugs titles (at the right side) hard to read. The patch
attached below makes the interface looks much better for me.
Also, the severity list suffe
package ttf2tex
tags 415163 confirmed
thanks
* K.-M. Hansche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 17:09]:
> Package: ttf2tex
> Version: 0.70-3
> Severity: normal
>
> The "test.tex" file contains a reference to "dkg.map" which isn't
> installed.
Thanks for reporting this bug. The test works with the
* K.-M. Hansche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-16 16:55]:
> Package: ttf2tex
> Version: 0.70-3
> Severity: important
>
> The packages generated by ttf2tex-mkpkg need to depend on ttf2tex or to
> include the encoding files:
> T1-OSF.enc
> T1-SC.enc
> T1-SCOSF.enc
> T1-WGL4.enc
> TS1-AGL.enc
Ian,
Thanks a lot for your suggestions and also for reporting your private
discussion with Simon Tatham. Daniel and I have already agreed about the
license status of the headerless files. BTW, the package is already
uploaded and is sitting at the NEW queue.
[Daniel: if you wish to follow Ian's
package octplot
tags 415102 upstream
forwarded 415102
http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=1694544&forum_id=295323
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libcurses-ui-perl
Version: 0.95-5
Severity: minor
"file browers" -> "file browsers"
This typo prevented me from getting useful results with "apt-cache search
file browser perl". Please, fix it.
Thanks,
Rafael
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unsta
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-15 08:57]:
> * Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 17:58]:
> > I made one other change: i included Simon's generated btree.html in
> > docs/, since it seems relevant, small, and unobtrusive.
>
&g
> i386 at the moment.
I checked the package and I think that 3.01-2 has release quality. If you
agree, I will upload it to unstable. My comments below are quite minor and
you could implement them in a future version of the package.
> On Wed 2007-03-14 12:49:35 -0400, Rafael Laboissiere wr
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 13:22]:
> On Wed 2007-03-14 12:49:35 -0400, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
>
> > * LICENCE:
> > + Are the contents of this file some standard boilerplate? The licensing
> > conditions look DFSG-compliant, but
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 17:49]:
> * debian/control:
> [snip]
> + Reference the upstream website according to the guidelines in section
> 6.2.4 of the Debian Developer's Reference [1].
> [snip]
I forgot the link:
[1]
http://www
Daniel,
The package builds fine and is in a good shape. Thanks for your work. Here
are some (mostly minor) comments/suggestions:
* debian/rules:
+ Remove commented lines with dh_* commands
+ Add proper header with copyright notice and license terms
* debian/control:
+ Put my name and ema
* Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-14 00:17]:
> OK, i've packaged tweak version 3.01 now.
>
> I've published binary packages for i386, arm, and powerpc (and of
> course the source as well). They work for me on both etch and sid.
> The packages are in an apt repository located at:
* Alan W. Irwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-12 19:10]:
> On 2007-03-13 00:30+0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> >Since you are the authors of the file, here is a forward.
> >
> >What do you think about this issue? (please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >in Cc for the record)
>
> I no longer have an intere
* Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-03 11:15]:
> block 405399 by 382195
> thanks
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 11:50:45PM -0800, Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > Package: amarok
> > Version: 1.4.4-2
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > With libmtp working its way through mentors[1], it woul
* manuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-14 14:44]:
> block 396369 by 382195
> thanks
libmtp is now in unstable [1]. Please, build-depend on libmtp-dev and
reupload gnomad2.
Thanks,
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-changes/2007/03/msg00690.html
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
package octave2.9
tags 414001 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
* Francesco Potorti` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-08 15:33]:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 2.9.9-8etch1
> Severity: normal
>
> -- Built-in Function: error (TEMPLATE, ...)
> The `error' function formats the optional arguments u
* Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-04 08:33]:
> >* debian/po/gl.po: Added translation of debconf templates to Japanese.
> > (closes: #413222). Thanks to Kobayashi Noritada.
>
> s/gl.po/ja.po/ :-) Could you please correct retrospectively?
>
> # This is not a problem and
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-04 00:19]:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 07:35:00PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > * Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 14:59]:
> >
> > > * Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 13:18
package octave2.9-forge
tags 413196 pending
thanks
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 14:59]:
> * Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 13:18]:
>
> > Package: octave2.9-forge
> > Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7
> > Severity: normal
Japanese.
+(closes: #413222). Thanks to Kobayashi Noritada.
+
+ -- Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:18:45 +0100
+
jed (0.99.18-8.etch.3) unstable; urgency=low
* debian/po/gl.po: Added translation of debconf templates to Galician.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
-
* Kobayashi Noritada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 22:08]:
> Package: jed
> Version: 0.99.18-8.etch.3
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch l10n
>
> Here is a Japanese debconf templates translation for your jed package.
> Could you please place this file in debian/po as ja.po in your package?
> An
package octave2.9-forge
tags 413196 confirmed
thanks
* Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-03 13:18]:
> Package: octave2.9-forge
> Version: 2006.07.09+dfsg1-7
> Severity: normal
>
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> My problem precisely resembles this:
> http://thread.gman
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-26 10:20]:
> Status update:
> Octaviz 0.4.6 has been released, meant to be used with Octave 2.9. This
> is still targetted post-etch.
Any plans to release a Debian package for it?
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
* Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-28 11:13]:
> However, since dictionaries-common already seems to be supplying data for
> specific applications, what's the drawback of doing that for one extra
> specific application?
FYI, Agustín have already checked in my changes for including squi
package jed-extra
retitle 372231 jed-extra: please add ruby.sl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-21 22:46]:
> Although this bug does not concern the versions of the packages now in
> testing (octave2.9_2.9.9-7 and octave2.9-forge_2006.07.09+dfsg1-7), I
> understand that it would be good to have the version in testing also f
package glpk
reassign 400690 wnpp
retitle RFP: python-glpk -- Python binding to the GLPK library
thanks
The following bug has been filed against the glpk package:
* Jeff Abrahamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-27 20:30]:
> Package: glpk
> Version: 4.11-1
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> p
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-22 18:36]:
> I don't understand what the problem is getting the new version into
> testing thru unstable. octave2.9 2.9.9-8 is already approved by the
> release team to go to testing, but it being blocked by the RC bug
> (#411863). There is no reason to
package glpk
tags 363514 moreinfo
thanks
* James Andrewartha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-19 22:55]:
> Package: glpk
> Version: 4.9-1
> Severity: important
>
> When compiled on platforms where sizeof(void *) > sizeof(int), which
> includes AMD64, glpk should be compiled with -D_GLPLIB_HUGEMEM to
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-21 15:23]:
> Package: octave2.9
> reassign 410463 octave2.9-forge
> thanks
>
> Am Samstag, den 10.02.2007, 21:38 +0100 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > error: invalid matrix index = 1
> > error: evaluating assignment expression near line 158, column 12
> > error
package octave2.9
tags 411863 fixed-in-experimental
thanks
* Thomas Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-21 14:54]:
> Package: octave2.9
> Version: 2.9.9-8
> Severity: important
> Tags: fixed-upstream
>
> The following one-liner in Octave 2.9 uses up all memory until the OOM killer
> kicks in:
>
* Ana Guerrero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-14 20:54]:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:50:58PM -0400, Manuel Garcia wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm waiting for libmtp in Debian to add mtp's device support to
> > gnomad2, when it will be in sid? Thanks.
>
> libmtp is in the NEW queue: http://ftp-master.debi
acs-minor-version 4)
--
Rafael
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 02_dired-use-ls-dired.dpatch by Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
##
## DP: Fixed logic for the default value of dired-use-ls-dired, which is
## DP: failing in xemacs21. This should fix Bug#399483 and Bu
package aspell-pt-br
tags 410189 pending
thanks
The new aspell-pt-br package, which fixes Bug#410189, is in the NEW queue
waiting for ftp-admin approval.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mutt-vc-query
Version : 002
Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://rolo.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libvc
Version : 003
Upstream Author : Andrew Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
701 - 800 of 1104 matches
Mail list logo
