On 26.05.2012 18:11, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> when generating the image. The only possible case I can think
> of is when you listed
>
> INITRDSTART=/dev/md0
>
> (the same as for root filesystem in fstab), but using /dev/md/0
> in mdadm.conf -- in this case, mkinit
Neil, can you comment on the change to Monitor offered
in the mentioned bugreport please?
On 12.04.2012 23:28, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Neil, re http://bugs.debian.org/658701 , how do you think,
> is it okay if mdadm --monitor will send email in case check
> found mismatches, the sa
On 26.05.2012 19:03, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
[]
>> Note also that you still have the same inconsistency -- you list
>> /dev/md/0 in mdadm.conf, but use /dev/md0 as root filesystem. I
>> can't say it works by design, more by a chance, it is better to
>> use consistent naming there.
>
> Alri
Source: roxterm
Version: 2.6.3-1
Severity: normal
This is another variant of #639687.
When current directory of the shell running inside a roxterm window gets
removed, there's no way to start a new window/tab: roxterm complains that
it can't chdir to a deleted directory because that directory doe
tags 674919 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On 28.05.2012 20:00, Wakko Warner wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-11
> Severity: important
>
> I'm using libvirt 0.9.9-3+b2 to start VMs with kvm. I just upgraded qemu-kvm.
> I am no longer able to start VMs where I have defined a file
On 29.05.2012 07:56, Wakko Warner wrote:
[]
> (process:14897): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_thread_pool_new: assertion
> `g_thread_supported ()' failed
> worker thread initialization failed
[]
> You know what, forget all of the above. My libglib version is 2.28.6-1. I
> extracted the library from libglib
On 01.06.2012 16:23, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 01.06.2012 16:15, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> Hi Michael and William
>>
>> Dmitrijs called off his NMU and expressed his interest to join our team
>> while I updated repository with more changes.
>
> I'm doing
On 01.06.2012 18:42, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> Dmitry, your two changes, both marked as fixing #674391,
>> are wrong and needs revered.
>>
>> First, a small thing, the kmod change,
>> c6ac061e12208cdf32291223b27caeefec6ce241.
>> Here's the changelog difference from it:
>>
>> [Dmi
Lucas, can you please verify the new release
actually fixes the bug you reported? We made
some changes in attempt to fix this issue, but
Dmitry says it still fails to build, and I can't
reproduce it locally.
Thank you!
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.or
Package: ftp.debian.org
Following the autofs package rename (from autofs5 to autofs),
the old package names become dummy/transitional, hence oldlibs/extra.
New packages are autofs, autofs-hesiod and autofs-ldap.
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.o
On 18.12.2011 22:28, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 18.12.2011 22:23, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 18.12.2011 22:16, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>>>
>>> Package: busybox-udeb
>>> Version: 1:1.17.1-8
>>>
>>> The Debian/Squeeze installer fail
On 02.06.2012 23:59, Conrad Wood wrote:
[]
> In some "cloud" environments, including ours, we configure an ethernet device
> with a single /32 IP Address. Say, for example 5.6.7.8/32. The Default
> Gateway is, for example, 9.10.11.12. The linux kernel and BSD happily work as
> desired and send o
On 03.06.2012 13:43, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Reading the bug about CVE-2011-2716, I think the only question left is this:
>
>>> So, in all cases the variable is enclosed in double quotes.
>>
>> Yes this look secure. What about the udeb script?
>> /debian/tree/busybox-udeb/usr/share/u
On 03.06.2012 12:21, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first, thank you all for the work on a refurbished autofs package! I
> would like to draw your attention to #639529, as it would be great to
> fix this before the wheezy freeze and it's just a minor modification.
>
> Let me sum up, as the le
tags 672112 + moreinfo unreproducible pending
thanks
On 08.05.2012 17:23, Tomas Martišius wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-11
>
> Severity: serious
>
> qemu-kvm VM W2K3 quest reboots (crashes with blue screen) when there are
> several VM on intel xeon server and some server load/I
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 1.0+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch, upstream
Using -vga std and -M pc-0.12 results in qemy assertion fault right at
virtual machine startup:
$ kvm -vga std -M pc-0.12
kvm:
/build/buildd-qemu-kvm_1.0+dfsg-11-i386-hf29ru/qemu-kvm-1.0+dfsg/memory.c:1239:
memory_regi
On 06.05.2012 10:16, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sun, 6 May 2012 15:24:10 Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> And note that whole 5.0.6-allow-for-kernel-packet-size-change.patch
>> is NOT NEEDED, it should be reverted upstream. *SIGH*, we spent
>> a ton of time and emails discussing thi
On 09.05.2012 22:42, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> I'm checking the package now, it all appears to be quite good (as I
> already mentioned initially).
>
> I'm verifying now whenever the transition works correctly. Did you test
> this place? Is it possible to downgrade bac
On 05.05.2012 19:07, David Fries wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-12
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> qemu-kvm stops parsing the USB descriptor table when it sees an
> alternative interface entry that doesn't match the currently set guest
> request preventin
On 11.05.2012 12:32, a debian user wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I know that I can enable the IPv6 privacy extensions after the installation of
> debian.
>
> But I think it is important that I can enable the IPv6 privacy extensions for
> the
On 11.05.2012 22:19, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: syslinux-common
> Version: 2:4.05+dfsg-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> - in a d-i checkout, run "make -C build build_netboot"
> - boot the resulting build/dest/netboot/mini.iso
12.05.2012 16:46, ka...@karme.de wrote:
[]
> finally got around to do some more testing
> looks like it depends on the metadata version in use
> using metadata 1.2 adding a bitmap to a raid created without bitmap
> doesn't work:
Yes it is about version 1 metadata. This bug should be fixed in
mdad
On 14.05.2012 23:13, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> That's the constructs like this:
>>
>> bb_error_msg_and_die(bb_msg_memory_exhausted);
>>
>> where bb_msg_memory_exhausted is declared as extern char *.
>> This is a poor-ma
Package: ifupdown
Version: 0.7~rc3
Severity: serious
The new ifupdown package does not recognize comments in middle of lines in
/etc/network/interfaces anymore. For example, I have the following on one
of our hosts:
iface eth0 inet static
address 192.168.177.7
netmask 255.255.255.192 # /26, 0
On 15.05.2012 21:20, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.177.7
> netmask 255.255.255.192 # /26, 0..63
Interesting. The manpage actually says that in-line coments are
NOT supported, but I've never actually noticed this till today.
It has alw
On 15.05.2012 21:32, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 15 May 2012 21:26:17 +0400
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> Interesting. The manpage actually says that in-line coments are
>> NOT supported, but I've never actually noticed this till today.
>>
Ok, a few more words about the situation.
Indeed, the in-line comments has never been actually supported.
They were supported indirectly, by shell which is used to run
all commands generated from various pieces of interface
definition.
What changed in latest version is the way how resulted comman
Package: mdadm
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream patch
http://neil.brown.name/git?p=mdadm;h=d9751e06a601b5576b1b9e2c8126584083110ca5
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.raid/38356
There are a few other problems in 3.2.4 (not regressions)
which should be fixed in 3.2.5.
This bug i
Package: debsums
Version: 2.0.51
Severity: normal
When debsums is installed, reportbug calls it for any package it is called
for. But if there's a multiarch library in this list, reportbug will fail:
$ reportbug libopenal1
Getting status for libopenal1...
Verifying package integrity...
There may
On 05.04.2012 18:24, Svante Signell wrote:
[]
> Thank you for a prompt feedback. Network speed is now 1.7 Mbps (not as
> large as 2.6 Mbps but much better than 0.3 Mbps) but I'm testing this
> remotely. Have to have physical access to the host to find out the real
Did you have a chance to test act
Package: spice-vdagent
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: normal
The spice-vdagent package provides only the short
one-line desrciption, but lacks the extended/long
multi-line description text. This basically means
it is impossible to understand what this package
is for or what it is doing.
Thanks,
/m
Source: xserver-xorg-video-qxl
Version: 0.0.17-1
Severity: wishlist
Since 0.0.16 version, xspice bits has been merged into
x86-video-qxl source tarball, built with --enable-xspice
configure flag. Please provide either a separate
package, say, xserver-xorg-xspice, or enable xspice in
the same xse
On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>[LaMont Jones]
>* Link with and use sqlite when building dict_sqlite. add sqlite
> dictionary to dynamicmaps.cf. Closes: #666950
Hmm. This is not what the bug is about, isn't it? Quoting my bugreport
again:
> New postfix rele
reopen 666950
severity wishlist
tags 666950 + patch
retitle 666950 sqlite support should be in separate package, not in main
postfix package
thanks
On 12.04.2012 20:22, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 12.04.2012 18:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>>[LaMont Jones]
>>* Li
tags 668034 + squeeze
thanks
On 08.04.2012 16:42, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: mdadm
> Version: 3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> FAQ.gz:
> In two thirds of the cases, yes[0], and it does not matter which layout you
> use. When you assemble 4 disks into a RAID1
tags 668035 + moreinfo
thanks
On 08.04.2012 16:54, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Package: mdadm
> Version: 3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Hi,
>
> Just got this mail:
> /etc/cron.daily/mdadm:
> mdadm: No mail address or alert command - not monitoring.
> run-parts: /etc/cron.daily/
On 12.04.2012 23:02, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 12-4-2012 20:59, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Can't you default to mailing root or just using syslog?
>>
>> How did you generate /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf ? The mdadm
>> postinst script creates this file which incl
On 12.04.2012 23:20, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>> Anyway, I think the current behavour is right.
>
> Why?
> Can't you default to mailing root or just using syslog?
It _is_ the current situation already - to mail to root.
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@list
Neil, re http://bugs.debian.org/658701 , how do you think,
is it okay if mdadm --monitor will send email in case check
found mismatches, the same way it sends email about other
more critical errors?
I think Russell has a good point here, but there's one more
source of mismatches we have in kernel
On 31.03.2012 01:28, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Package: mdadm
> Version: 3.2.3-2
> Followup-For: Bug #664088
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> seems I've been stumbled over this bug. I'm running wheezy and can reproduce
> a crash:
> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap=none
> mdadm --grow /dev/md0 --bitmap
On 12.04.2012 23:33, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On 12-4-2012 21:29, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 12.04.2012 23:20, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
>>
>>>> Anyway, I think the current behavour is right.
>>>
>>> Why?
>>> Can't you default to m
On 13.04.2012 00:22, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Am 12.04.2012 um 21:38 Uhr schrieb Michael Tokarev :
>> On 31.03.2012 01:28, Markus Hochholdinger wrote:
>>> Package: mdadm
>>> Version: 3.2.3-2
>>> Followup-For: Bug #664088
>>
tags 653473 - moreinfo + confirmed upstream
severity 653473 important
thanks
Replying to an old bugreport, see http://bugs.debian.org/653473
for full prior history.
This topic popped up again today, I did another bisection of
a netbsd networking problem, and discovered that:
a) I can reproduce
On 13.04.2012 13:46, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-9
> Severity: normal
>
> I cannot get optimal network througput on KVM guest using Debian Wheezy (and
> stable) as KVM host.
> It is not horribly bad, just not good compared to relevant alternatives.
>
> I ha
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646249)
This might also be related to this kernel bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42829
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis
Upstream committed two patches which should fix this
issue. Two commits:
http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=a13ccc991a852cf12f2c05f537c40ce239ae464f
Author: Alon Levy
Date: Wed Mar 21 18:17:18 2012 +0200
ui/spice-display: use uintptr_t when casting qxl physical addresses
http://
retitle 652326 libspice-server does not work on i386 (32bit)
severity 652326 important
thanks
Apparently the next version of spice will actually work in i386.
This is JFYI, and actually I don't have more details on this,
just, well, rumors.
The "errors out on startup" bit was due to spice-related
On 15.04.2012 13:51, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
> Per you request I downloaded qemu-kvm_1.0+dfsg-8_amd64.deb from
> snapshot.debian.org and lo and behold: 19.1 gbit/s!
Thank you very much for testing this!
> In other words there is a massive network efficiency regression
> between -8 and -9. Even
On 16.04.2012 00:41, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
>> As for the network-related issues, indeed, this is something which
>> is quite unexpected. I browsed all changes between 1.0 and 1.0.1,
>> but I don't see a single change which may have this effect...
>
> I am no dev but I would guess that severa
On 16.04.2012 10:25, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote:
>> And especially if first, simple, kvm1.0 variant
>> _does_ show the bad speed already, there's no need
>> to try others, since the prob might be somewhere
>> else entirely: this binary is equivalent to what
>> was in 1.0-8 but rebuilt using current
On 22.03.2012 19:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 22.03.2012 15:06, Anthony Bourguignon wrote:
>> Package: qemu-kvm
>> Version: 1.0+dfsg-9
>> Severity: important
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I encountered an issue with version 1.0+dfsg-9 of qemu-kvm (it
tags 673904 + wontfix
thanks
As I explained several times, this problem must be fixed
on both sides - both gmp and qemu, and it is "more correct"
to fix it in gmp side. The problem im gmp is that it uses
"abort()" statements in cases where it detects "impossible",
to its "thinking", CPU. Instead
[]
> As I explained several times, this problem must be fixed
> on both sides - both gmp and qemu, and it is "more correct"
> to fix it in gmp side. The problem im gmp is that it uses
> "abort()" statements in cases where it detects "impossible",
> to its "thinking", CPU. Instead of these aborts(
merge 674410 674413
tags 674410 + wontfix
thanks
24.05.2012 16:52, Wolfram Gloger wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-11
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please consider the appended patch for the udev rule file,
> so that group kvm can use vhost-net.
>
> Regards,
> Wolfram.
>
> --- debian/q
On 11.06.2012 19:45, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 14:21:05 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Two scripts in initramfs-tools currently hardcodes path to sleep
>> as /bin/sleep, because busybox sleep (which were used when
>> busybox is in used) didn't
tags 677254 + upstream pending
forwarded 677254 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=5300
thanks
On 12.06.2012 21:19, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Christoph Egger, le Tue 12 Jun 2012 18:19:03 +0200, a écrit :
>> Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds:
>>
>> LD procps/built-i
On 17.04.2012 16:04, Sven Schnelle wrote:
> Package: vgabios
> Version: 0.7a-2
> Severity: wishlist
>
> I'm using kvm + vgabios on a QXGA resolution screen. Unfortunately, it doesn't
> have this resolution in its VBE tables. Here's a patch to add it:
>
> diff -Naur vgabios-0.6c.ori/vbetables-gen.
severity 677528 normal
tags 677528 + upstream confirmed
thanks
On 14.06.2012 19:24, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.1~rc+dfsg-1
> Severity: minor
>
> $ kvm -m 1.4g
> KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
Wow. Just.. wow.
I'm raising the severity to normal, it is definitely not a m
On 15.06.2012 00:10, Gary Dale wrote:
> I finally bit the bullet to try a fresh install from the command line. After
> much gnashing of teeth, the command line I came up with is:
>
> virt-install -n ghostwheel --cpu kvm64 -c
> "/home/garydale/Downloads/WindowsXPPro64.iso" --os-variant=winxp64 --
On 14.06.2012 16:39, Sergey B Kirpichev wrote:
[lots of good stuff]
Guys. I'm leaving for a 2-week vacation (I had no vacation
for 2 years in a row, and can't stand anymore). I'll try to
review this stuff while being in a sea beach, maybe will commit
something.
But to me, much more important is
On 15.06.2012 01:46, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 14/06/12 04:26 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> kvm -cdrom WindowsXPPro64.iso -drive file=ghostwheel.img,cache=unsafe -m 1G
>> -cpu qemu64
> I get an error about SDL:
I told you it will open an X window. Give it a $DISPLAY.
/mjt
On 15.06.2012 02:11, Gary Dale wrote:
[]
> It doesn't open an X window. It complains about:
>
> No protocol specified
> Could not initialize SDL(No available video device) - exiting
>
> Now I seem to have SDL installed. However, searching through the kvm
> documentation to find information about
forwarded 677528 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/92493
thanks
On 15.06.2012 02:41, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Michael Tokarev , 2012-06-14, 23:25:
>>> $ kvm -m 1.4g
>>> KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
>>
>> Wow. Just.. wow.
>>
>&
14.06.2012 17:56, Steve Petruzzello wrote:
Package: autofs
Version: 5.0.6-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Here is a patch correcting minor typos in /etc/init.d/autos.
Well. these are not typos, these were old attempts to
internationalize the messages initscript produces:
> - log_action_begin_msg $
18.06.2012 23:14, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: seabios
Version: 1.7.0-1
Severity: wishlist
Please enable Xen support in seabios. It will be used by the next Xen
release and maybe the version in Wheezy.
Do you know what's the outcome of this? As far as I remember, it is just
a config option,
16.06.2012 13:34, Sergey Kirpichev wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
I'll try to review this stuff while being in a sea beach,
maybe will commit something.
Unfortunately I can't do anything from here at all. The wifi in the hotel
works, but they
Package: ifrename
Version: 30~pre9-8
Severity: normal
Package ifrename provides an initscript to rename existing
interfaces, so this should work without udev. But it has
no dependencies on module-init-tools (or kmod) listed, so
insserv sorts it before module-init-tools in rcS.d, and
it is the mod
On 01.05.2012 08:23, Steve Langasek wrote:
> +CFLAGS := $(filter-out -Werror=format-security,$(CFLAGS))
Why do you filter this -W option?
Also, I'd rather use EXTRA_CFLAGS not CFLAGS alone, or
the other way around (allowing EXTRA_CFLAGS), but I'll
have to check.
Thanks!
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On 02.05.2012 06:28, Cun Zhang wrote:
> Subject:It seems that memory leak in kvm with Windows XP guest very seriously
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1:1.0+dfsg-11
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> After I upgrade the kernel to 3.2.0, the WinXP guest in the kvm VM
> become so slow, and I
On 02.05.2012 08:33, bug...@i2pmail.org wrote:
> Package: kvm
> Version: 1:0.12.5+dfsg-5+squeeze8
>
> This bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670997 can also be
> about kvm itself (or qemu?) not about cdrom images, so reporting it there.
>
> Debian stable + backports KVM is una
Package: postfix
Version: 2.9.1-4
Severity: wishlist
Postfix uses FIFOs for /var/spool/postfix/public/pickup and
/var/spool/postfix/private/qmgr, according to upstream
master.cf file. These are used as triggers, by writing a
char into one of these files corresponding service gets
waked up to do i
02.05.2012 16:39, Bastian Blank пишет:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:00:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 09:53:14AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Why do you filter this -W option?
>> Well, it causes a build failure if you don't.
Ping? Any information about this bug?
(see also the initial bug, #645337)
On 29.01.2012 19:58, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> tags 645336 + moreinfo
> thanks
>
> On 14.10.2011 19:26, martin f krafft wrote:
>> Package: qemu-kvm
>> Version: 1:0.14.1+dfsg-4
>> Severit
On 29.03.2012 18:38, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Excerpts from Michael Tokarev's message of Mon Mar 26 14:54:34 +0200 2012:
>> 26.03.2012 16:36, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>> Package: qemu-kvm
>>> Version: 1:1.0+dfsg-9
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>>
>>> When you select the reboot option in aros kvm writes:
03.05.2012 14:03, Kasatkin Nikolay wrote:
> Package: ipxe
> Version: 1.0.0+git-20120202.f6840ba-3
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Maintainer, please consider including undionly.kkpxe in ipxe package.
> We use undionly.kpxe for netbooting computer classes in our university. But
> there are mainboard
On 05.05.2012 17:34, Liang Guo wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm looking for co-maintainers of package spice. Current spice
> embeds celt051, an obsolete version of celt, so we intend to
> remove celt051 support in spice, but
severity 671471 grave
thanks
I don't know who's bug/issue it is (it might be alsa bug
after all), but it is definitely not just "important":
it breaks all audio on the system, after pulseaudio
update no application produces sound anymore - vlc,
xine, mplayer, alsa tools, qemu, and (proprietary)
fl
On 06.05.2012 08:21, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Just saw http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=671627 (someone
> forwarded it to me). Glad it seems to have worked out :) If you want
> more help pls let me know, but if you're comfortable as is that's great.
Well, it hasn't worked out yet
On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs"
>
> * Package name: autofs
>Version : 5.0.6-1
Hello Dmitry.
I'm very much interested in this package myself, an
On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for package "autofs"
>>
>> * Package n
On 06.05.2012 09:21, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 06.05.2012 09:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> On 06.05.2012 07:14, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>>> Severity: normal
>>>
>>> Dear mentors,
>>>
>>> I am loo
On 06.05.2012 09:45, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
>> ++p = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(my_utsname.release, "."));
>> ++q = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
>> ++r = (unsigned int)atoi(strtok(NULL, "."));
>> ++return KERNEL_VERSION(p, q, r);
>> ++}
>>
>> This will break
On 18.04.2012 04:14, Vugar Dzhamalov wrote:
> Package: qemu-kvm
> Version: 1.0+dfsg-9
> Severity: important
>
> It seems that I am getting into something very similar to these bug reports:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554078
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug
On 18.04.2012 18:51, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michal Suchanek wrote (05 May 2011 13:41:01 GMT) :
>> Booting this way from an Ubuntu USB install media is also very slow
>> but at least I can confirm the media is bootable.
>
> I'm going to file a wishlist bug about USB2 redirection soon,
> that w
On 23.04.2012 11:54, Vugar Dzhamalov wrote:
[]
I'll take a look. For the next time, please don't send me
content of your /usr/bin or any other directories. Just
_versions_ of the software affected, and, most important,
the steps you did to (re)produce the issue. This includes
the way you start
Okay, I re-created your configuration with vde_switch,
and I found the kvm command lines you used in one of
the files -- you sent just too much information so
really important bits got lost in the noize initially.
I'm doing a copy test from one guest /dev/zero to another
guest /dev/null. It copie
On 26.04.2012 12:24, Vugar Dzhamalov wrote:
>
> Thank you for doing this. I am very appreciate and sorry for wasting your
> time
> with this.
> Lets be honest here I've reported it more than a week ago and so far no one
> else joined the discussion. I guess it is quite obvious that there is
>
On 03.06.2012 15:15, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
[]
>>> "automount: files ldap"
>>
>> Will it be bad if this line will be left out after removing autofs-ldap
>> package, ie, when automount nsswitch entry is listing non-existing lookup
>> method? I guess I should try...
>
> Apart from leaving
On 03.06.2012 16:31, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.0.6-2
> Severity: important
>
> For reasons I haven't entirely taken the time to figure out, the
> changes between 5.0.6-1 and 5.0.6-2 have destroyed my ability to
> automount NFSv4 shares. My configs are dead simple, my ent
tags 675796 + pending
thanks
On 03.06.2012 16:36, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Package: autofs
> Version: 5.0.6-2
>
> The autofs package's postrm script it calls "ucfr -p autofs5 $CONFF"
> for CONFF in /etc/auto.master /etc/auto.net /etc/auto.misc
> /etc/auto.smb /etc/default/autofs; which no longer wo
On 03.06.2012 16:55, Andreas B. Mundt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 04:06:37PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I guess autofs doesn't use "nsswitch.conf" at all, does it?
Apparently it does -- this is the very end of default /etc/auto.master
file:
# Include central ma
On 03.06.2012 15:29, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
[]
> Good! Will you ensure that 1.20 ends up in wheezy?
Yes I very much like to have at least this version
in wheezy.
Thanks,
/mjt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On 03.06.2012 17:35, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> tags 675796 + pending
> thanks
>
> On 03.06.2012 16:36, Jamie Heilman wrote:
>> Package: autofs
>> Version: 5.0.6-2
>>
>> The autofs package's postrm script it calls "ucfr -p autofs5 $CONFF"
retitle 675798 autofs requires portmapper on server even for NFSv4 mounts
tags 675798 confirmed upstream
thanks
On 03.06.2012 17:31, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> Does it work if you enable portmapper/rpcbind on the server?
> (It is enabled here)
I just verified - and indeed, with no r
On 03.06.2012 18:39, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 03.06.2012 17:31, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> []
>> Does it work if you enable portmapper/rpcbind on the server?
>> (It is enabled here)
>
> I just verified - and indeed, with no rpcbind running on the
> server, automount do
On 03.06.2012 23:38, Jamie Heilman wrote:
[]
>> For now I suggest to actually run rpcbind on the server, this
>> issue needs to be dealt with upstream. Neither version of the
>> code is right.
>
> Hell no. The entire reason I bothered with v4 is because it gets rid
> of the external portmapper r
On 03.06.2012 23:15, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> I dunno, and I don't really know what advantages the in-autofs NFS
>> handling gives, over nfs-utils utilities.
>
> Then why did you enable it?
Because it is how the code is supposed to work initia
04.06.2012 05:34, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Michael, please excuse me for adding my portion of rant.
>
> Generally speaking assumptions and changes to package' logic outside
> of packaging updates would be safer to avoid when we should release
> ASAP due to freeze time.
>
> Even to me the change in
On 05.06.2012 00:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reassign 676001 busybox
> Bug #676001 [initramfs-tools] initramfs-tools: busybox's switch_root doesn't
> handle /proc or /sys moving
> Bug reassigned from package 'initramfs-tools' to 'b
retitle 652573 busybox ip addr add ip.add.re.ss/32 does not work
thanks
On 05.06.2012 14:18, Jens Ott - Profitbricks wrote:
> Michael,
> Conrad,
>
> as far as I am aware, the problem is NOT the dhcp-client of busybox
> itself but the hook-script used in debian. Find attached a hook-script
> which
801 - 900 of 2616 matches
Mail list logo
