❦ 6 octobre 2016 20:47 CEST, Adrian Bunk :
>> > If you fancy explaining what you think browserified means w.r.t. the
>> > Jison stuff, go ahead of course. That might at least help to focus the
>> > discussion a bit. Just don't feel obliged to because I said so.
>>
>> The libjs-handlebars iss
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:48:02AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 5 octobre 2016 22:49 CEST, Philip Hands :
>
> > If you fancy explaining what you think browserified means w.r.t. the
> > Jison stuff, go ahead of course. That might at least help to focus the
> > discussion a bit. Just don't
]] Adrian Bunk
> Where you placed the dots policy says:
>
> Every package in _contrib_ must comply with the DFSG.
Yes, so you put the source in the source package. Job done. I haven't
checked the licenses of the various packages, but AIUI, that's not the
problem. The problem is that pac
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:48:28PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Adrian Bunk
>
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > >...
> > > I think it'd be preferable for the software to be in contrib (AFAIK
> > > there's nothing here which is non-free?)
> > >...
> >
]] Adrian Bunk
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> >...
> > I think it'd be preferable for the software to be in contrib (AFAIK
> > there's nothing here which is non-free?)
> >...
>
> When a package is not DFSG-free it is non-free.
>
> Only DFSG-free packages th
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 07:26:06PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>...
> I think it'd be preferable for the software to be in contrib (AFAIK
> there's nothing here which is non-free?)
>...
When a package is not DFSG-free it is non-free.
Only DFSG-free packages that depend on non-free software are
]] "Joseph R. Justice"
> I'll be honest, I assumed from what I've read that a decision had
> already been made by the FTP team against Mr. Praveen. I figured that
> it must have been, or else why would he be raising this bug with the
> TC now?
It's not clear that it has, which is one of the reas
]] Joseph R. Justice
> Is there any information yet on what formal policy (if any) will be
> used by the release managers for allowing bugs to be tagged
> stretch-ignore? *Was* there any formal policy ever set in place for
> the prior (the current stable) release of Debian, e.g. Jessie, or
> prior
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 02:23:37PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>...
> All of the above are imperfections (yes, bugs) in how src:firefox handles its
> internal sqlite3.c code copy. In an ideal world:
>
> * src:sqlite3 would provide sqlite3.c in a binary package (sqlite3-static ?)
> * src:fi
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:48:36AM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
>...
> The security team are going to have to track down every instance of that
> code and fix it. If the bug is something to do with an interaction
> between the code and the tools used to "browserifiy" the code, that may be
> non-triv
Le jeudi, 6 octobre 2016, 14.38:21 h CEST Adrian Bunk a écrit :
> I am not sure whether this has been filed as a bug in any affected
> package, but src:sqlite3 is not affected.
>
> The problem is the amalgamation in other packages, for example:
> https://sources.debian.net/src/firefox/49.0-4/db/s
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:43:00AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2
> (reopening)"):
> > Perl's Configure or SQLite are other examples of code with similar
> > issues currently in Debian, and it would be helpful if the TC would
>
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 01:13:16AM -0400, Joseph R. Justice wrote:
> For the record, I wish the message I am now responding to, and other
> subsequent responses and discussion, were being sent to the bug mail
> address *in addition to* all the other addresses they're being sent to.
>...
For the re
Philip Hands writes ("Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2
(reopening)"):
> I'm just writing as an individual here BTW, but I'll obviously carry
> these views into any discussion that the TC might have about this.
Phil, thanks for that excellent contribution. Thanks also to Joseph
for
"Joseph R. Justice" writes:
>> Here are some factors to consider:
>>
>> 1) It's not clear to several TC members that the FTP team has decided
>> on this question. It seems fairly clear how they would decide if they
>> did decide, but from a process standpoint, it's important to have a
>> formal
Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Bug#839570: Browserified javascript and DFSG 2
(reopening)"):
> Perl's Configure or SQLite are other examples of code with similar
> issues currently in Debian, and it would be helpful if the TC would
> start by gathering an overview of the different cases and how they
>
❦ 5 octobre 2016 22:49 CEST, Philip Hands :
> If you fancy explaining what you think browserified means w.r.t. the
> Jison stuff, go ahead of course. That might at least help to focus the
> discussion a bit. Just don't feel obliged to because I said so.
The libjs-handlebars issue has little
17 matches
Mail list logo
