On 04/27/2011 10:53 +0800 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Just an advice. Don't just hope. Test it with:
>
> uscan --report --verbose
Thank you. Using watchfiles for launchpad doesn't seem to be as easy as
for other download sites ;-)
But now I found a solution and uploaded to mentors.
Thanks,
Dani
On 04/27/2011 02:31 AM, Daniel Richter wrote:
>> * The watch file doesn't work.
>>
> Oops, there's still "2.0". I changed it to 2.1 now. Hope it works…
>
Just an advice. Don't just hope. Test it with:
uscan --report --verbose
Thomas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lis
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 17:14:24 Jaromil wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
> I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can
> quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff
compared
> to what we have in sid is rather large.
you mean lots change
I added the linker version script and a symbols file in git. Would you
please upload the changes Mr. Mejia?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db70ff1
Hi Sven,
Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2011, 15:16 +0200 schrieb Sven Hoexter:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote:
> I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still
> not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we
> handle sof
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:37:25PM +0200, Matteo Vescovi wrote:
> > Also, if this is your first package, it may be a good idea to fix bugs
> > in the current package (ie prepare 0.99.14-4), rather than preparing a
> > new upstream version.
>
> Should I? :-P I'm not so sure I could help solving bug
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:18:08PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> > > of my package "ripit".
>
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.9.3-1
of my package "uthash".
It builds these binary packages:
uthash-dev - A hash table and linked list for C structures
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors
* Peter Pentchev [110426 15:49 +0300]:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> > of my package "ripit".
> >
> > It builds these binary packages:
> > ripit - Textbased audio CD rip
dear Stefano,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Hi Jaromil (2011.04.26_10:53:58_+0200)
> > compare that with the process of "becoming an Ubuntero" in launchpad,
> > which is free software BTW, and the answers will come to surface.
>
> As a Debian and Ubuntu developer I can say that t
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
> I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple package one can
> quickly learn to grasp and you fix a FTBFS, though the diff compared
> to what we have in sid is rather large.
you mean lots changed? well, if you have a look at the frequency of
upda
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:48:16AM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
Hi,
> It seems like lowercase would be the way to go. The description is not
> a sentence and capitalizing the first letter makes it feel like a
> sentence (when it is not one.)
> Since it now feels like a sentence, you also begin t
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:33:46 +0200, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> > -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
> > +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
> this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
> packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
> Maybe we should try to
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Sven Hoexter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> Hey Peter,
>
>> -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
>> +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
>
> this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
> packag
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 03:49:30PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Hey Peter,
> -Description: Textbased audio CD ripper
> +Description: textbased audio CD ripper
this is a rather interesting one. After a short look at various
packages we seem to have a mixture of upper and lower cases.
Maybe we sho
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 08:30:05PM +0200, Daniel Richter wrote:
Hey,
I've been asked some time ago to take a look at this package. I'm still
not sure if I'd really like to sponsor it. I'm not sure how exactly we
handle software which edits rather vital configuration files and I did not
even test i
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 11:53:58 Jaromil wrote:
dear George,
Dear Jaromil,
Let's skip mediterranean style dramas.
I had a look at it since it is a relatively simple
package one can quickly learn to grasp and you fix a
FTBFS, though the diff compared to what we have in
sid is rather large. I
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> of my package "ripit".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
>
> This is an upload to unstable with no changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22/04/2011 14:39, Etienne Millon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I offered my help so here it is :)
Thanks a lot! ;-)
>> Who is interested in helping, can find my build files at [1].
>> I started from scratch, meaning that I downloaded the source package
>>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 01:38:02PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
> of my package "ripit".
Uploaded, thanks.
Sven
--
And I don't know much, but I do know this:
With a golden heart comes a rebel fist.
[ Streetlight
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.9.0-2
of my package "ripit".
It builds these binary packages:
ripit - Textbased audio CD ripper
This is an upload to unstable with no changes to the version which resides in
exparimental.
The package appears to be lintian clean
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.9.8+hg5533f6de130c-3
of the orphaned package "ketchup" which I want to adopt.
It builds these binary packages:
ketchup- update utility for linux-kernel sources
The package appears to be lintian clean.
The upload would fix these
Hi Jaromil (2011.04.26_10:53:58_+0200)
> compare that with the process of "becoming an Ubuntero" in launchpad,
> which is free software BTW, and the answers will come to surface.
As a Debian and Ubuntu developer I can say that the processes are pretty
similar. Both require review of uploads, and u
dear George,
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, George Danchev wrote:
> priorities and procedures established by a broad agreement among the
> project, and if you want something to improve, try doing it yourself
> first as in do-ocracy, see links below of how to help.
i don't exactly consider the links below
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 10:35:51 Jaromil wrote:
dear Mentors,
Dear Jaromil,
first and foremost: thanks for your answers!
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, The Fungi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:28:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I see that one uploader of hasciicam is Debian Developer. He i
Le Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:35:51AM +0200, Jaromil a écrit :
>
> sure! and so I did, also knowing Filippo personally. In fact, despite
> the limited amount of time at his hands, he is doing his best to
> review my other upstream software package, which is arguably more
> urgent than hasciicam: free
dear Mentors,
first and foremost: thanks for your answers!
On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, The Fungi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:28:10AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > I see that one uploader of hasciicam is Debian Developer. He is
> > the first person to contact for upload or to recommend you a
27 matches
Mail list logo