On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:22:20PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
You won't be approved with no package in the archive.
coughbullshitcough
Unless things have changed in the 18 months or so I've been a DD. I had no
packages sponsored or otherwise in the archive for about the first month or
so
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:04:34PM +0200, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
all doing your Debian work in own spare time, but doesn't this ring a bell
that there is something in the whole procedure that simply does not work?
OK, please suggest a better way. Criteria to be fulfilled are:
1) Nobody should
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 05:56:07PM -0600, Larry Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Matthew Palmer wrote:
In the case of software for Palmpilots and whatnot, unless a DD has
compatible hardware, they can't test it. (Incidentally, if someone really
wants to get pose in, they can donate
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:11:46PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
I packaged ROX-Filer (http://rox.sf.net/). Some time ago version 2.0.0 was
released as stable so I changed few things in packaging. Now I have 3
packages:
1. rox - stable release only version of ROX-Filer
2. rox-snapshot
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:15:00PM -0700, Keith Dunwoody wrote:
I want to adopt a group of related packages (the
abuse-related packages, in this case), but the
description of the abuse package says it has been
obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I
think this package should be
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 12:11:46PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
I packaged ROX-Filer (http://rox.sf.net/). Some time ago version 2.0.0 was
released as stable so I changed few things in packaging. Now I have 3
packages:
1. rox - stable release only version of ROX-Filer
2. rox-snapshot
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 02:15:00PM -0700, Keith Dunwoody wrote:
I want to adopt a group of related packages (the
abuse-related packages, in this case), but the
description of the abuse package says it has been
obseleted by abuse-sdl, and I would have to agree. I
think this package should be
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First a bug says:
* #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.
I have contacted the upstream author
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 02:15:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First a bug says:
* #143670: fda: Upstream location is bogus
I've checked the location, it's not there anymore.
Look for a new web , and I only found references to the Debian archive.
I have contacted the upstream author
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
--
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is not part of Debian, it merely uses Debian's
infrastructure.
- Matt
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:54:32PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be appreciated.
Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
Hint: non-free is
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:58:06AM +1000, An?bal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 21:45 +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Package name: zed
Package description: Powerful, multipurpose,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Do you have anything to sponsor? It's all well and good to say I want a
sponsor, but unless you've got something to show us, it's unlikely any DD
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:45:55PM +0200, Sergio Suarez wrote:
Hi Im new in debian develop and want adopt the orphan package zed, I =
need a sponsor
Do you have anything to sponsor? It's all well and good to say I want a
sponsor, but unless you've got something to show us, it's unlikely any DD
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I would like to install postgres into a chroot environment, where the
postinst script can't ask for the path where to create the database
directory etc. How can I preset these data (like db_fset), so the
postinst script can get the data via
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:07:00PM +0200, GCS wrote:
I would like to install postgres into a chroot environment, where the
postinst script can't ask for the path where to create the database
directory etc. How can I preset these data (like db_fset), so the
postinst script can get the data via
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 29 Jun 2003, francesco levorato wrote:
I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
Tell us what it is in the e-mail. Saves a bit of time for people who might
be interested but don't want to possibly waste the time of checking the app
site.
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On 29 Jun 2003, francesco levorato wrote:
I am looking for sponsor for the package minido.
Tell us what it is in the e-mail. Saves a bit of time for people who might
be interested but don't want to possibly waste the time of checking the app
site.
- Matt
disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
as being
fixed. I don't think there's a changelog entry to do that, so it'll be a
big message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] g
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
as being
fixed. I don't think there's a changelog entry to do that, so it'll be a
big message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] g
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
will include file clashes, philosophical differences, et
al. But nothing exactly mind-boggling, or fundamentally different from what
is done already.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http
...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
(probably)
http://localhost/packagename/ to /usr/share/packagename.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
?
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
other webserver which users mention? There's
pretty general purpose code to do such things in my phpwiki package
(although it's PHP, not CGI).
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
are welcome of course.
Once you've got it to the quality of wanting it in Debian, contact me and
we'll work something out. It certainly looks interesting.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http
as it goes into Debian.
Not checking over the source is likely to cause much grief.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
of protections do you have in place or plan to
put in place to protect against this sort of thing?
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Tue, 13 May 2003, Daniel K. Gebhart wrote:
Matthew Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote Tue, May 13, 2003 at 08:36:12AM
+1000:
*very* serious problem for anyone who starts relying on the binary packages
uploaded to m.d.n. What sort of protections do you have in place or plan to
put
will
check over your package and, if it is of sufficient quality, will upload it
into the archive on your behalf.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
beyond his comfort zone. g
[1] Actual ridicule on debian-devel may result in a very warm reception.
Ridicule not advised unless underpants are asbestos.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http
On Fri, 25 Apr 2003, Rene Tschirley wrote:
Due to the WNPP the package 'taper' is orphaned for quite a long period
of time. According to Martin Michlmayrs posting in debian-devel, the packet
will be removed from Debian if nobody volunteers to become the new
maintainer. I use taper and think
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
Or would you like to accuse me of tampering with the list archives while
you're at it?
Oh, ok. If you'd like. ;-)
Consider me offended. g
Out of interest, are there any MUAs which have a separate reply to list
function?
Most do AFAIK. Not
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Pete Ryland wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:46:21AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, David Z Maze wrote:
Your mailer doesn't have a reply to all button? Get a better one,
Debian has lots.
The problem we're discussing, though, is that reply
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Bob Proulx wrote:
Tony Maro wrote:
Why do I feel like I opened a can of worms?
It is that squirmy feeling in the gut. Like just before the alien
claws its way out.
Tony really should read the labels better.
- Matt
upstream a bone and host it myself. Of course, if it's a libpst is in
breach of our bullshit patent #DEADBEEF problem, then he's dead in the
water no matter what.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
On Wed, 16 Apr 2003, Joe Nahmias wrote:
I posted a clarification from upstream about this to the BTS -- see
the ITP (bug #178113) http://bugs.debian.org/178113. It doesn't seem
(to me) that there is any _real_ legal issues -- perhaps mailing -legal
is the right thing to do...
Fear is as
) problem.
Note that access to the serial/usbtty ports is vital to the daemon in the
package.
Heh. 'chmod 666 /dev/*' would work... grin
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au
don't think there's going to be much
hope in the list etiquette arena...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Mon, 14 Apr 2003, Jay Graves wrote:
Does anyone have the time to give my package a quick look and upload it
to main?
The package is available at http://jay.skabber.com/debian/
I'm going to have a look at it, on the basis that this is a bugfix special
only.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian
here.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
).
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On 15 Apr 2003, Tony Maro wrote:
No, I definitely used the Debian tools to build the package from
sources. The only problem is that the rules file must include an
absolute path to the Lazarus development environment which is passed to
FPC during compile - which will be different on your
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Fielder George Dowding wrote:
Right! Get on with it, eh?
I'd say that's a pretty succinct way of putting it! g
- Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Sun, 13 Apr 2003, Fielder George Dowding wrote:
Right! Get on with it, eh?
I'd say that's a pretty succinct way of putting it! g
- Matt
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Jarno Elonen wrote:
Since stable base packages (in addition to effective developmen tools!) are
the most important factor in making a stable OS, it would be good to have
more work concentrated on them.
As Colin has already pointed out, bugs.qa.debian.org can give lists
? This presumption of death
must have come from somewhere...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
for discussion purposes, I
suggest you do so. It'll be an educational experience.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
On Fri, 11 Apr 2003, Daniel Pecos wrote:
I would like to become a debian developer, so I have read all
the recommended docs on debian web page, and created a
deb package for a program. Now I need an advocate in order to go
through new maintainer process as said in
help (free time? what's
that? says I) but I can offer a hearty best of luck!.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
[This is probably going to sound hypocritical coming from a DD, or
excessively harsh, but try and stick with me]
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member,
[This is probably going to sound hypocritical coming from a DD, or
excessively harsh, but try and stick with me]
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I would really like to be a contributing member of Debian,
but it is the chicken and egg thing. I can't help until I
become a member,
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, B. Douglas Hilton wrote:
I really could give a ratt's a$$ about a Debian email address, that is
the least of my concerns. Just what I don't need is another email address.
Well, that's a start. I was hard on the issue of the e-mail address because
it's an easy analogy...
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote:
1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay?
If it's standard artistic, then yes.
2. Is there any interest for such a package?
From the incredibly long list of Packages of Dubious Interest (which I
can't find now, but which was very funny when I
On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Titus Barik wrote:
1. Is the license for PennMUSH okay?
If it's standard artistic, then yes.
2. Is there any interest for such a package?
From the incredibly long list of Packages of Dubious Interest (which I
can't find now, but which was very funny when I
happy to discuss specifics on
the list.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
happy to discuss specifics on
the list.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
As far as I can tell, no modules depend on it - Maybe I am searching for
this the wrong way, but...
There's an apt-cache command which shows reverse depends... Aah, there it
is, showpkg. Run that over any package, and it'll show you Reverse Depends
by their disappearance -
they weren't getting updates for the module anyway, and it's not as though
apt removes packages from your system just because they're no longer in the
archive...
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
by their disappearance -
they weren't getting updates for the module anyway, and it's not as though
apt removes packages from your system just because they're no longer in the
archive...
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On 24 Nov 2002, Rob Bradford wrote:
I think it would be nice to achieve some kind of convention on the
format of messages requesting sponsors for packages.
Not a bad idea, on the whole. Feel like writing this up in a webpage
somewhere, sort of a Requesting Sponsorship HOWTO. That way, anyone
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
Just noticed it. I somehow got false information that its not possible
to ITP a package without first getting a sponsor. So I packaged phpbb and sent
Anyone can file a bug; an ITP or RFP is no different in that regard. It's a
little haphazard
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Shiju p. Nair wrote:
Just noticed it. I somehow got false information that its not possible
to ITP a package without first getting a sponsor. So I packaged phpbb and
sent
Anyone can file a bug; an ITP or RFP is no different in that regard. It's a
little
to the
punch.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
packagin skills to bits enough for one day.
g
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packagin skills to bits enough for one day.
g
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
contact for is your keysigning. This page may help:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2#key_signature
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
contact for is your keysigning. This page may help:
http://www.debian.org/devel/join/nm-step2#key_signature
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
someone would take it
on as a personal interest learning project, but your chances of getting
top-quality from that are pretty slim.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
probably the best option. The icecast people might keep it going on
the idea that if there's good XMMS support, more people are likely to use
icecast.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
someone would take it
on as a personal interest learning project, but your chances of getting
top-quality from that are pretty slim.
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence
http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
probably the best option. The icecast people might keep it going on
the idea that if there's good XMMS support, more people are likely to use
icecast.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
if they ignore you or decline - sponsoring *does*
take time (I know, I sponsor a couple of people) and everybody is very busy
these days. Perseverence will win through in the end.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
if they ignore you or decline - sponsoring *does*
take time (I know, I sponsor a couple of people) and everybody is very busy
these days. Perseverence will win through in the end.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Package: debian-jr
Conflicts: limewire
g
Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
misconception here that seems to be prevalent about Debian
On Sun, 28 Jul 2002, Ben Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:53:42PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
Package: debian-jr
Conflicts: limewire
g
Ack! While realizing this is humour, I do feel I have to clear up a bit of a
misconception here that seems to be prevalent about Debian
on the shared library package.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
coming from?
The first porn site that gets advertised via debian software probably isn't
a long way off if we walk down this path.
Package: debian-jr
Conflicts: limewire
g
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
on the shared library package.
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
coming from?
The first porn site that gets advertised via debian software probably isn't
a long way off if we walk down this path.
Package: debian-jr
Conflicts: limewire
g
--
Matthew Palmer, Debian Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
--
---
#include disclaimer.h
Matthew Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
501 - 596 of 596 matches
Mail list logo
