On Thu 26 May 2016 at 17:05:02 -0500, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 26 May 2016 at 20:29:30 (+0100), Brian wrote:
>
> > Life is too short to worry about whether network-manager delivers the
> > goods. Just use ifupdown and wpa_supplicant and you will live happily
> > ever after.
> >
> > People a
On Thu 26 May 2016 at 20:29:30 (+0100), Brian wrote:
> Life is too short to worry about whether network-manager delivers the
> goods. Just use ifupdown and wpa_supplicant and you will live happily
> ever after.
>
> People are fixated on wicd. What is so wrong with wpagui?
Finding I had this ins
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:29 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 25 May 2016 at 21:21:14 -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > The OP deposited his FUD in -user (twice), completely ignored the
>> > invitation to explore a technical solution using ifupdown
On Wed 25 May 2016 at 21:21:14 -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Brian wrote:
> >
> > The OP deposited his FUD in -user (twice), completely ignored the
> > invitation to explore a technical solution using ifupdown and has now
>
> Regardless of ifupdown, I want networ
On Wed, 25 May 2016 21:21:14 -0800
Britton Kerin wrote:
Hello Britton,
>Regardless of ifupdown, I want network-manager to work
>like it's supposed to, i.e. the same way in a dbus-launch-spawned
>session as under gnome. It doesn't. That a bug, not FUD.
Just yesterday, when doing some upgrades,
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 23 May 2016 at 09:07:36 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:38:39PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
>> > On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So what ever B says goes?
>> > > Please *NO* !!
On Mon, 23 May 2016 20:13:38 +0100, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 24 May 2016 at 01:17:44 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
>
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>> > "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough
>> > nonsense in this thread yet for it to b
On May 24, 2016 12:45 PM, "Seeker" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/23/2016 12:50 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
>>
>> Le quintidi 5 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
American? There are two continents. Do you mean the U.S.A? - the land
of
the rooster and other euphemistic terms?
>>>
>>> What
On 5/23/2016 12:50 PM, Nicolas George wrote:
Le quintidi 5 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
American? There are two continents. Do you mean the U.S.A? - the land of
the rooster and other euphemistic terms?
What becomes of Canada and Mexico in that scenario??
A friend of mine suggest
This entire subthread is off topic. Please stop posting to it.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
There is no form of lead-poisoning which more rapidly and thoroughly
pervades the blood and bones and marrow than that which reaches the
young author through mental
Could you please stop this OT?
Thanks.
Il 23 maggio 2016 23:58:57 CEST, John Hasler ha scritto:
>Lisi writes:
>> What becomes of Canada and Mexico in that scenario??
>
>The ruling class in Mexico would have been seen as Spanish. The
>Canadians seem to have gotten firmly labled Canadian early on
Lisi writes:
> What becomes of Canada and Mexico in that scenario??
The ruling class in Mexico would have been seen as Spanish. The
Canadians seem to have gotten firmly labled Canadian early on (after
they stopped being French). You'll have to ask the 18th century
Europeans why they weren't just
On Monday 23 May 2016 21:06:56 Joe wrote:
> It used to be known as Notwork Manager,
Or Network Mangler. ;-)
Lisi
On Sat, 21 May 2016 21:02:15 -0800
Britton Kerin wrote:
> somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gnome,
> and none of the command line tools or references I've found work.
> That includes /etc/network/interfaces,
> direct use of ifconfig,iw,ip,rfkill,wpa_supplicant,dhclient,
Le quintidi 5 prairial, an CCXXIV, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > American? There are two continents. Do you mean the U.S.A? - the land of
> > the rooster and other euphemistic terms?
> What becomes of Canada and Mexico in that scenario??
A friend of mine suggested "United States of Puritania" for the d
Brian writes:
> American? There are two continents.
Europeans attached the label "American" to residents of the USA (and
predecessor semi-autonomous British territories) back in the 18th
century. Their visitors from South America self-identified as Spanish
or Portuguese.
--
John Hasler
jhas...@
On Sun, 22 May 2016, Britton Kerin wrote:
> Trying to run nmcli fails from other window managers with dbus errors,
> which it absolutely shouldn't do since network-manager is running.
> Same with nm-connection-editor and wicd-client, they are all
> apparently dependent on dbus now, and dbus doesn't
On Monday 23 May 2016 20:13:38 Brian wrote:
> On Tue 24 May 2016 at 01:17:44 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough
> > > nonsense in this thread yet for it to be appl
On Tue 24 May 2016 at 01:17:44 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough
> > nonsense in this thread yet for it to be applied to you. But you could
> > try really hard. ;)
>
On Mon 23 May 2016 at 09:07:36 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:38:39PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > >
> > > So what ever B says goes?
> > > Please *NO* !
> >
> > Richard - this snipping is very misleading
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> "Arseholes" is the correct terminology. You've not posted enough
> nonsense in this thread yet for it to be applied to you. But you could
> try really hard. ;)
In English it's "Arseholes"; in American it's "Assholes".
--
The media's the mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:38:39PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 22, 2
On Sunday 22 May 2016 22:56:36 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> >> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence.
> >
> > Folks, I'm out of this
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
>>>
>>> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence.
>>
>>
>> Folks, I'm out of
On 5/22/2016 3:23 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
[...] it merely indicates your incompetence.
Folks, I'm out of this thread.
So what ever B says goes?
Please *NO* !
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 08:35:22PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> [...] it merely indicates your incompetence.
Folks, I'm out of this thread.
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAldCFSQACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZDqACeO5aM
On Sun 22 May 2016 at 10:34:02 -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:44 PM, wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:02:15PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> >> somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gno
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:44 PM, wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:02:15PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
>> somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gnome, and none
>> of the command line tools or references I've found work.
s.debian.org
Subject: wireless without network-manager... is it still possible?
Resent-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 05:02:30 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gnome, and none
of the command line tools or references I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 09:02:15PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote:
> somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gnome, and none
> of the command line tools or references I've found work. That
> includes /etc/network/interfaces,
> direct
somehow network-manager makes it work. But I've had it with gnome, and none
of the command line tools or references I've found work. That
includes /etc/network/interfaces,
direct use of ifconfig,iw,ip,rfkill,wpa_supplicant,dhclient, and
wicd-client (though it's not really what I want.
Is this ev
31 matches
Mail list logo