Re: Review Request 13011: XEN - Unable to deploy VM in guest network VLAN with different subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13011/#review24090 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Sheng Yang On July 29, 2013, 6:36 a.m., bhar

Re: Review Request 12759: CLOUDSTACK-3669: Bringing down the dynamic scalable check (for VM whether it has xstools or vmware tools in it) to the management layer.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12759/ --- (Updated July 29, 2013, 6:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Pr

Review Request 13011: XEN - Unable to deploy VM in guest network VLAN with different subnets

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13011/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sheng Yang. Bugs: Cloudstack-3871 Repositor

Review Request 13010: rb-jenkins-integration test patch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13010/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaers and Prasanna Santhanam. Repositor

Re: Review Request 13010: rb-jenkins-integration test patch

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13010/ --- (Updated July 29, 2013, 6:34 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaer

Re: Review Request 12937: CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12937/#review24089 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On July 26, 2013, 8:41 a.m., Har

Re: Review Request 13009: CLOUDSTACK-3744 - Accounts not cleaned up

> On July 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py, line 613 > > > > > > I think you should remove the ntwk offering altogether from cleanup. > > > >

Re: Review Request 13009: CLOUDSTACK-3744 - Accounts not cleaned up

> On July 29, 2013, 4:35 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py, line 613 > > > > > > I think you should remove the ntwk offering altogether from cleanup. > > > >

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

> On July 26, 2013, 12:28 p.m., Jayapal Reddy wrote: > > test/integration/component/test_egress_fw_rules.py, line 370 > > > > > > Please add network offering details also here. > > > > #1. deploy VM using netw

Re: Review Request 12934: Tests for egress firewall rules for advance zone

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12934/ --- (Updated July 29, 2013, 4:57 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilam

Re: Review Request 12937: CLOUDSTACK-3779: Support System vm scaling on VMWare

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12937/#review24081 --- engine/schema/src/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade410to420.java

Re: Review Request 13009: CLOUDSTACK-3744 - Accounts not cleaned up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/#review24082 --- test/integration/component/test_netscaler_nw_off.py

RE: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

+dev (the older dev@incubator mail id showed up in the previous mail - probably needs to be fixed in jenkins) From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] Sent: Sunday, July 28, 2013 9:11 PM To: Jenkins Cloudstack.org; Kelven Yang; Sate

Re: Review Request 12759: CLOUDSTACK-3669: Bringing down the dynamic scalable check (for VM whether it has xstools or vmware tools in it) to the management layer.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12759/#review24080 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Nitin Mehta On July 25, 2013, 6:05 a.m., Har

Review Request 13009: CLOUDSTACK-3744 - Accounts not cleaned up

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13009/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-3744 R

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

Hugo, My patch was intended for the 4.2 branch and not for master (it won't apply cleanly on master) – looks like jenkins is trying to patch this against the master branch and I'm seeing this failure – do I need to do something here? I can create a patch for master but I need this to go into 4.

Re: Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/#review24078 --- Review 13008 failed the build test : FAILURE The url of build clouds

Review Request 13008: Fix usage of vm.instancename.flag when generating VM names on ESX hypervisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13008/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Chip Childers, Kelven Yang, Sateesh C

Re: Review Request 12654: Added logpath variable and replaced hardcoded path

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12654/ --- (Updated July 28, 2013, 10:08 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Wido den

Re: Review Request 12999: [GSoC] Add mid-term report

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12999/ --- (Updated July 28, 2013, 5:38 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Sebastien Goa

CloudMonkey's new home

Based on our previous discussion thread[1], we've moved CloudMonkey out of ACS's repository to its new home [2]. Now, with 6f84e74a68d78705a06fe58f7927f42f61453a16 on master, we no longer have cloudmonkey in tools/cli. CloudMonkey will be within CloudStack project but now as an independent sub-proj

Re: Meet up on July 20th - Hyderabad, India

Thanks for sharing them with us Nitin, good to discover interests and traction from students. Probably see you in next FOSS.in or any reachable conference. Cheers. On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > Hi Rohit - Good to hear from you ? It went well and was well received. Most

RE: New Components on JIRA

Agreed, test issues showing up in blockers/critical is confusing. I guess, for product issues found through automated tests, we could use Issue type = Bug and component = Automation in addition to the actual component where the bug is found. > -Original Message- > From: Prasanna Santha

Re: Review Request 13004: Bug:advance zone, create public Network with vlan id specified, but the portgroup is cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 not cloud.public.[vlanid].0.1-vSwitch0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/#review24059 --- Review 13004 PASSED the build test The url of build cloudstack-maste

Re: New Components on JIRA

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:15:12AM +, Ram Ganesh wrote: > > > > > > Prasanna, > > > > > > How about - automation-product and automation-script components? > > > Automation-product for all product bugs discovered by the automation > > > engine and automation-script for all automation script iss

Review Request 13004: Bug:advance zone, create public Network with vlan id specified, but the portgroup is cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 not cloud.public.[vlanid].0.1-vSwitch0

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/13004/ --- Review request for cloudstack, edison su and Wei Zhou. Bugs: https://issues.apa

Re: Do we delete an account after all users are deleted?

I've removed the invalid tests from test_accounts when I noticed we don't have any tests for lock/disable accounts in there. Filed a bug for the missing tests: CLOUDSTACK-3884 On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 03:19:52PM +, Sowmya Krishnan wrote: > That's the behavior right now - we don't delete the acc

Re: Meet up on July 20th - Hyderabad, India

Hi Rohit - Good to hear from you ? It went well and was well received. Most of the folks were able to run dev cloud. We have a good setup built with IIITH university and will be holding it more often there now. Hoping to gain more traction and interest from students as well going forward. Slides c

Re: Review Request 12913: Fix map based APIs in CloudMonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12913/#review24058 --- I've simplified the check in this way: -missing = filter

Re: Review Request 12913: Fix map based APIs in CloudMonkey

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/12913/#review24057 --- Thanks, it was applied on the new cloudmonkey/master repo; commit 92

Re: Meet up on July 20th - Hyderabad, India

Hi Nitin, how did it go. Share presentation, videos, blogs if any. Cheers. On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Nitin Mehta wrote: > There is an upcoming meet up on July 20th at Hyderabad, India > There will be talks on CS architecture and hacking with devcloud. > Detailed info @ > http://www.meetu

Re: [DISCUSS][VOTE] Moving cloudmonkey to its own repository, have its own release process

Sorry, I did not have bandwidth to reply but now. Just to update people on this; in our next steps - Remove tools/cli from cloudstack's repo and fix README and link to the cloudmonkey repo, inform users, devs - Write a wiki on cloudmonkey's release process, which is around "ship fast, break things

Re: Dev Help: How to create scheduled tasks in ACS

On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Donal Lafferty wrote: > A CloudMonkey script in a cron task is a possibility. > > See > http://dlafferty.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/using-cloudmonkey-to-automate.htmlfor > details on writing the CloudMonkey script. > > I'll try to follow up with a sample script next w

Re: BuiltIn appliance for use in integration tests

On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:24:18AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 06:02:04PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote: > > Almost all the integration tests use the built-in CentOS template in > > the deployment for their test scenarios. Sometimes this is less > > desirable since the t

Bug : Create Vmware Advance Zone , Public Network with vlan 509 specified, but portgroup created is cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 not cloud.public.509.0.1-vSwitch0

Hi all, In lastest CS 4.2 code, I create advance zone with hypervisor vmware esxi, create public Network with vlan id 509 specified and label vSwitch0, when cs create systemvm(cpvm,ssvm), a new portgroup with name cloud.public.untagged.0.1-vSwitch0 was created, not a portgroup cloud.publi