[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2017-02-14 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 PR#1741 is closed. So closed this PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature e

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-27 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I am not able to merge my changes with @jayapalu's branch, so I have created a new PR #1741 which includes everything from this PR as well as all the changes I had to make to get both Remote Access

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-27 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu I need to get all my changes merged into this PR though. This PR has bugs as it is. I will open a new PR with a merge of your changes and my changes today. --- If your project is set u

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-27 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill We will try to wrap up this PR by next week. I will also try to post the test results then we will push the changes after LGTMs. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-26 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Tomorrow I will pick a recommended S2S VPN configuration and verify the rest of the different possible options with that single configuration to give a better global picture of the state of this PR

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-26 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I wrote a small testing setup which allows me to automate the build up and tear down different configurations in test environment. Here are the results so far of my branch (hopefully soon t

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-26 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu I am not sure why, but I can't seem to do a pull request against your branch. Any ideas why? Maybe you have some specific permissions on your repo to stop this? If you are not sure, I

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-19 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill The changes added are some improvements. One example is before running ipsec up , calling ipsec down --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-19 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu the issues are harder to notice if the connection is always coming up. The problem is if you do a configuration which the connection does not come up. Because of the logic I pointed out

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-19 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I have created two VPCs and configured the s2s vpn from UI. My tunnels are coming up without manually restarting the ipsec in this branch. s2s_customer_gateway: ++--

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-18 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill I did not test the case of delete vpn on error state, so I did not come across the vpn config file mess. Each time we configure the s2s vpn we suppose to overwrite config fie (ipsec.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-18 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I have to solve for this now though: ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13644/19495845/0811c4ba-9553-11e6-9691-1cc17941526d.png) --- If your project is set up for it, y

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-18 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I think I have found why the VPN connections are not correctly being deleted from the VR when you run `deleteVpnConnection`. The [problem is here](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-17 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill My setup is up with the strongswan template. Configured s2s VPN connection, I could observe that once that 'ipsec restart' or reload/rereadsecrets brought up the tunnels. I

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-14 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Hey @jayapalu, thanks for the follow up. Here are a couple things to note. - In order to get Remote Access VPN to work you need to update the L2TP conf file to include `type=transport`. - I

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-14 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill Let me also try the issue you have mentioned in my setup on Monday. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-14 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 The more I dig into this the deeper the rabbit hole goes. Here are a few things I have found which I need to address. - When a VPN connection, gateway, etc is deleted, the configuration is not

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-13 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I have found a new issue. If I create a S2S VPN connection, and then clean up everything. The S2S VPN connection still works even though there is nothing configured in ACS anymore. Looking into

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @serg38 if you respond from email, can you remove the quoted text so it does not add a full page of text to the GitHub issue. :P Maybe edit your above response to remove the extra text since this

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @serg38 Inline... `plutostart=no` will do nothing. I need to remove that, I just have not gotten around to cleaning that up. That config option no longer is even picked up: https://wiki.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill Can you try changing in ipsec.conf plutostart=no keyexchange=ikev2 and adding ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024! esp=aes256-sha1! From: Will Stevens Re

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Thanks to @kiwiflyer for finding this link: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/926179 We have been able to create a connection by setting the registry for `AssumeUDPEncapsulationContex

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 At @serg38's request, here are the current configs... ``` # cat /etc/strongswan.conf # strongswan.conf - strongSwan configuration file # # Refer to the strongswan.conf(5) ma

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread Sergey Levitskiy
@swill I believe windows natively support "L2TP” . And I see they negotiated both encryption and integrity . looks like the difference is this: On OSX xl2tpd[2263]: control_finish: Peer requested tunnel 32 twice, ignoring second one. On windows it seems it trying to establish ‘child’ session

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @murali-reddy, @jburwell mentioned to ping you regarding the above. Not sure if you have any ideas or suggestions, but I am open to any thoughts. Thanks... :) --- If your project is set up for

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 If anyone has experience with Remote Access VPN on Windows and has any insight into why the following is failing, please let me know. **FAILING WINDOWS LOG:** ``` charon: 11[NET] r

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @rhtyd ya I am trying to get it working with all. It is a lot of trial and error, more research, then more trial and error. Right now I have it working on Mac. On Windows, phase 1 is worki

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-07 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill thanks for sharing your progress, last time I hit the issue -- when I fixed it to make it work with osx, it won't work with windows and vice-versa so we need to test that vpn works on all th

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 For interested parties. One of the problems with the Mac VPN client with the previous OpenSwan integration was that you could not `cat` large files or `scp` files over the remote access vpn. I ha

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Thanks @serg38. I found this as well: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.8/networking/using_remote_access.html I personally don't have access to Wind

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill The default way is using integrated VPN client in Windows. For windows 8.1 the guide is here https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/networking/2014/01/13/configuring-native-vpn-client-thro

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 BTW @jayapalu, don't worry about any of these changes. Once I have everything working I will send a PR to your PR to make the changes and then a bunch of us can do another round of testing once yo

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 How are people using Windows Remote Access VPN? I have this working on Mac now, but it does not seem to work on Windows. I have been trying to find a solution, but it seems like the different Wi

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 **Update:** I found this article: https://lists.strongswan.org/pipermail/users/2014-October/006871.html **In the file `/etc/ipsec.d/l2tp.conf` I added the option `type=transport` to the `

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I will be writing a script to test all possible Site-to-Site VPN connection options to see which configurations are working and which configurations are failing. Then we will see where we are at..

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-06 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I have not been able to make the `Remote Access VPN` work with Mac. I have tried both `L2TP over IPSec` and `Cisco IPSec` (bare ipsec I believe), neither work. I am getting the same probl

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-05 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Sorry, found it. :) ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13644/19118904/f7471f20-8aeb-11e6-88dc-de4d436b8d1c.png) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-05 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu why would I get this when trying to enable `Remote Access VPN`? What is the significance of these IPs `10.1.2.1-10.1.2.8`? ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/13

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-04 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu I will continue testing the different combinations to see what is working and what is not. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-04 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu ^ --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if t

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-10-04 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 `3DES` is not installed in this template by default. I had to run `apt-get install libstrongswan-extra-plugins` in order to get support for `3DES` and for the configuration you specified to work.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-29 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Right, I forgot to mention that. Thanks @pdion891. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-29 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 in case of HTTPs issue registering the template http://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/5ef827605f884961b94881e928e7a250/swill/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2 can be use. --- If your p

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-29 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Here is the template (for xen anyway): https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/5ef827605f884961b94881e928e7a250/swill/systemvm64template-master-4.6.0-xen.vhd.bz2 So far I have not been able to get

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-28 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill can you please share the systemvm template URL. I can also run the test cases with it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-26 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill If your connection is not coming up without IKE DH in customer gateway configuration then try configuring IKE DH in customer gateway value from UI/API. In strongswan 5.2 ipsec,

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-23 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I got it to build, will be testing it soon... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-19 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @rhtyd have you gotten this system VM to build? I am having trouble getting it to finish building. My build is failing here... ``` + log DEBUG 'on_exit: clean_vbox' + local lev

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-19 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 I will start doing some testing on this today. Thanks... --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-19 Thread rhtyd
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Thanks @jayapalu I'm rebuilding some infra, I'll get back to you soon. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-19 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @rhtyd @pdion891 @swill I have squashed the commits. Added the template changes to install strongswan 5.2. Can one you trigger the systemvm template job on this branch. --- If your pr

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-19 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @pdion891 Below is the Remote access vpn config, update left with the VR public ip. #ipsec remote access vpn configuration conn L2TP-PSK authby=psk pfs=no

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-15 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Thanks for getting back to us @jayapalu. I will hold off focusing on this until you have made your update. If you can get @pdion891 the config, that will help us get to the point where we can sta

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-15 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu do you have a configuration example of strongswan for the remote management VPN? I would validate that the generated configuration will work with Windows and OSx clients. Tha

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-15 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @swill @kiwiflyer Sorry for the late response. I am started looking into this. I am looking into getting template with strongswan 5.2. Once it is done I will update the code changes.

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-12 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Thanks @kiwiflyer. I will let you know once I have something ready to start testing. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-12 Thread kiwiflyer
Github user kiwiflyer commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Yeah, I think this one is dead unless it gets reworked into a new PR. We might be able to help a bit on this one as well. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-12 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Given the lack of response, I am guessing I should just clone the work from this PR into my own branch and open a new PR once I have everything working... --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-09 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 @jayapalu are you active enough that if I make pull requests against your branch you can make the changes available in this PR. Or should I just start from your work and develop and test in my own

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-09-09 Thread swill
Github user swill commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 Is anyone working on this right now? Having reviewed this thread, I believe the following pieces are still outstanding: - fix merge conflicts. - potentially: upgrade the VR to use

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-08-12 Thread pdion891
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 JIRA reference: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8682 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-21 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 209 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-20 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 201 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-19 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 194 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=69 Failed=4 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-09 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 174 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-08 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 159 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-07 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 151 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-06 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 143 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-05 Thread jayapalu
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 135 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-04 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 127 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=71 Failed=2 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-03 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 119 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=69 Failed=4 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-02 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 113 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=70 Failed=3 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #872: Strongswan vpn feature

2016-06-01 Thread bvbharatk
Github user bvbharatk commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/872 ### ACS CI BVT Run **Sumarry:** Build Number 107 Hypervisor xenserver NetworkType Advanced Passed=67 Failed=6 Skipped=3 _Link to logs Folder (search by