Re: Project Visualization Tool...

2015-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le samedi 18 avril 2015 10:55:00 Shane Curcuru a écrit : > LOL, below. > > I highly recommend separating the model from the views, so that we can > efficiently enable our volunteer's energy here to actually accomplish > something valuable. +1 > > So let's work on stuff to do that excites us, but

RE: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread neera.x.singh
Hi Can anyone give any hint of implementing decision tree in pig? Thanks Neera -Original Message- From: Hervé BOUTEMY [mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr] Sent: 05 May 2015 11:37 To: sebb; Sergio Fernández Cc: dev@community.apache.org; ASF Site-Dev Subject: Re: DOAP format question Le mardi

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
Le mardi 5 mai 2015 01:05:31 sebb a écrit : > > OK, but that's because whoever code the XSLT decided to be defensive to > > such interpretation. > > If you read back in this thread you will see that I did this in order > to support both asfext:PMC and asfext:pmc. > > > But that does not mean is r

Captcha on Apache mirror

2015-05-04 Thread Niclas Hedhman
I just tried to download Maven and randomly selected a download mirror; http://apache.petsads.us/maven/maven-3/3.3.3/binaries/apache-maven-3.3.3-bin.tar.gz But get presented with a captcha, and I think that is not expected/allowed since it might break automated tools. Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, S

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
On 4 May 2015 at 20:50, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> > The term must be used exactly in the same way it is defined by the >> > namespace/vocabulary/ontology, otherwise won't be processed as expected. >> >> Theoretically, but not in this case. >>

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:04 PM, sebb wrote: > > The term must be used exactly in the same way it is defined by the > > namespace/vocabulary/ontology, otherwise won't be processed as expected. > > Theoretically, but not in this case. > > The processing is defined by XSL files that were manually cr

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
On 4 May 2015 at 19:37, Sergio Fernández wrote: > RDF can be serialized as XML, but the XML tool chain is not well suitable to > process RDF. That's what a meant when I early commented I was happy to > contribute proper DOAP/RDF infrastructure to projects-new.a.o. > > Back to the current issues...

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
RDF can be serialized as XML, but the XML tool chain is not well suitable to process RDF. That's what a meant when I early commented I was happy to contribute proper DOAP/RDF infrastructure to projects-new.a.o. Back to the current issues... see my comments inline. On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:51 PM,

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
On 4 May 2015 at 18:00, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote: > I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it > would be really useful > > But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc > instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was convinced that th

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
I'm not a RDF expert: if someone with more knowledge on this can join, it would be really useful But apart from seeing that most of the documentation was talking about pmc instead of PMC [1] (I just had to fix 1 place), I was convinced that the correct case is lowercase when reading asfext defi

Re: DOAP format question

2015-05-04 Thread sebb
There are 7 projects currently that maintain their own PMC RDF files. Alll of these use asfext:PMC (not pmc). However it looks like all of the project DOAP files use asfext:pmc rather than PMC. So the path of least resistance is clearly to use lower-case. On 4 May 2015 at 01:39, sebb wrote: >