Re: Sanity check or oddity with a single line to set a Boolean

2014-01-17 Thread Chris Martin
Oh wow, you mean it will work if I use the OR operator? /facepalm. Completely missed that mistake. Thanks Alex. Obviously works just fine. Can't believe I missed that this whole time. Chris On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > What happens if you use || instead of | > > On 1

Re: Sanity check or oddity with a single line to set a Boolean

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Harui
What happens if you use || instead of | On 1/17/14 3:24 PM, "Chris Martin" wrote: >Hey everyone, > >I'm not sure why this is not working, and i'd like to understand why I get >the compile error. I just keep looking at the code and thinking it should >be okay. I'm basically trying to set a Bool

Sanity check or oddity with a single line to set a Boolean

2014-01-17 Thread Chris Martin
Hey everyone, I'm not sure why this is not working, and i'd like to understand why I get the compile error. I just keep looking at the code and thinking it should be okay. I'm basically trying to set a Boolean via a "inline check". Here are some variables to give you an idea of the initialized

Re: Flex at ApacheCon

2014-01-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd? Yes but travel and hotel are not covered. [1] Well that what I assume as the call for paper link on [2] takes you to that page. At previously ApacheCons that wasn't always the case. For me it travel + hotel is the larger cost. Apache do

Re: Flex at ApacheCon

2014-01-17 Thread Jun Heider
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd? > > I have mixed opinions about whether Flex "must" be at ApacheCon. What do > other's think? > > On 1/17/14 12:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > > Hey Alex, To answer your question, yes yo

Re: Flex at ApacheCon

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Harui
Do you know if speakerss get their entry fee comp'd? I have mixed opinions about whether Flex "must" be at ApacheCon. What do other's think? On 1/17/14 12:29 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi, > >> Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover >>FlexJS as well? > >As much

Re: svn commit: r1559027 - /flex/site/trunk/content/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Harui
Ah good to know, but I don't want to deal with a comma separated list in Ant either. I think we're better off sticking with unique tags names. We could add a version attribute like this: Would that be sufficient for you? -Alex On 1/17/14 12:17 PM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: >Hi,

Re: Flex at ApacheCon

2014-01-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover FlexJS > as well? As much as I would like to go given it's proximity to 360Flex, the fact it's on the other side of the world, the cost and that I'm speaking/attending 4 conferences back to back in May I'm not sure I'

Re: svn commit: r1559027 - /flex/site/trunk/content/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

2014-01-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Ant's xmlproperty task doesn't seem to like repeated tag names. This help? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16356605/ant-xmlproperty-task-what-happens-when-there-is-more-than-one-tag-with-the-same Justin

Flex at ApacheCon

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Harui
Justin, are you doing a Flex talk at ApacheCon? If so, will you cover FlexJS as well? -Alex

Re: svn commit: r1559027 - /flex/site/trunk/content/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

2014-01-17 Thread Alex Harui
On 1/17/14 12:09 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote: > >Hi, > >-1 to this having numbers as node names is IMO asking for trouble and >putting an "v" in front of it is just a hack. There's certainly no need >to repeat the version information twice. > >Why not just do this as the id already contains the

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Alexander Doroshko
As I said I think there's no need in XXX-START/XXX-END markers at all. IDE that passed -ide param treats all var values as escaped. On 17.01.2014 14:59, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide instead of -escaped-var-values if we need s

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
The only drawback of doing this is that some static methods in ExpressionCache that are currently static should become instance methods, consuming a little bit more of memory, the difference is low because I can't see any cases where one has 1000s debugging sessions opened in the same time, so,

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide instead of -escaped-var-values if we need something else applied for IDEs later. Any other thoughts ? Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:12 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@fle

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Yes, something like fdb -escaped-var-values. If enabled then there's no need in start/end markers (like "IDEA-ESCAPE-START"/"IDEA-ESCAPE-END"), as var values are always escaped. Implementation of escape() method is there in my StringUtil class. On 17.01.2014 14:33, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: hum,

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
hum, what do you mean, something like "fdb -ide" ? Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:29:32 +0400 > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ? > > > Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to > > introd

Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Alexander Doroshko
Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to introduce a new first level helper command which would set a boolean value to apply this escapes, does it make sense ? Or may be just add undocumented command line option.

RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?

2014-01-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Oh, I missed this one yesterday apparently. Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to introduce a new first level helper command which would set a boolean value to apply this escapes, does it make sense ? Thanks, Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:26:36 +0400

RE: Mustella VM setup update

2014-01-17 Thread Frédéric THOMAS
Hi Om, Thanks for the update, it sounds good :-) Unfortunately and as I said before, for many reasons, I'm not in a position where I can help at the moment, the only way to me to do something for the project is when I reach some issues myself and fix them as I did yesterday. Thanks, Frédéric T

Re: svn commit: r1559027 - /flex/site/trunk/content/installer/sdk-installer-config-4.0.xml

2014-01-17 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 to this having numbers as node names is IMO asking for trouble and putting an "v" in front of it is just a hack. There's certainly no need to repeat the version information twice. Why not just do this as the id already contains the version? Justin On 17/01/2014, at 5:44 PM, aha...@