xmlbeans has taken over the xmlbeans 2 maven plugin. We should use their copy.
---
Key: GERONIMO-793
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-793
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvemen
Hi,
Even i had encountered a similar error during build . I fixed by doing
a checkout thats not HEAD.
then did maven m:fresh-checkout
maven m:build
Refer to following post
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Regards
Krishnakumar B
O
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-792?page=all ]
John Sisson resolved GERONIMO-792:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in rev 220241 in M4 branch. Fix in head not required as the toolsjarhack
has been removed.
> Typo in ToolsJarHack message
Typo in ToolsJarHack message at startup in M4
-
Key: GERONIMO-792
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-792
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: startup/shutdown
Versions: 1.0-M4
Reporter: Jo
I am having a bit of a hard time with some webservices in Tomcat
deployment. This "appears" to be an issue with servlet end points only
as EJBs seem to deploy fine.
The issue seems to occur when the TomcatWebContext is being deployed.
The error occurs on lone 78 in the GeronimoStandardContext
Hi,
When I run
$ maven m:build -Dmaven.test.skip=true -Dmaven.itest.skip=true
and got some errors and build failed in the end.
see screen shot:
Please let me how to fix them.
Thanks,
Joe Qiao
I'm getting this in OpenEJB assembly:
[java] 20:48:40,223 ERROR [GBeanInstanceState] Error while starting;
GBean is now in the FAILED state:
objectName="openejb.deployer:J2EEApplication=null,J2EEModule=org/apache/geronimo/J2EEDeployer,J2EEServer=openejb,j2eeType=ModuleBuilder,name=EJBBuilder
On Jul 21, 2005, at 8:44 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'm a bit dismayed about the previous posts about "assuming a
release will
suck". If thats your view then it will suck and one has to ask
what is the
relvance of the project? I think the goals in the past has been to
get to
J2EE 1.4 certif
On Jul 21, 2005, at 10:25 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
As for poor old people like myself who would like a tomcat-
integrated build rather sooner than later, perhaps we could beg
Jeff to do an unsupported build with tomcat as default just once
for M4?
Regards,
Panag
Aaron Mulder wrote, On 7/22/2005 7:19 AM:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our demo apps)
geronimo-spec/jars (our spec output)
geronimo-dependencies/jars/(put pluto thing here)
I think that this
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our demo apps)
geronimo-spec/jars (our spec output)
geronimo-dependencies/jars/(put pluto thing here)
I think that this is confusing, because t
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-791?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-791:
--
Description:
The current "GBean Framework" provides support for the methods of
J2EEManagedObject, meaning they're effectively implemented for every GBean
Remove GBeanInstance support for J2EEManagedObject methods
--
Key: GERONIMO-791
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-791
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Components: kernel
Versions: 1.0-M3
JettyModuleBuilder should use references to templates, not their names
--
Key: GERONIMO-790
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-790
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: we
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> > geronimo/jars (our output)
> > geronimo/wars (our demo apps)
> > geronimo-spec/jars (our spec output)
> > geronimo-dependencies/jars/(put pluto thing here)
>
> I think that this is confusing, because things like openejb, mx4j,
> tomcat.
On Jul 21, 2005, at 7:00 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Where in maven would this appear? I wonder if we should create a
"geronimo-dependencies" virtual project or something, as opposed to
putting something like this side by side with the proper geronimo
artifacts. What do others think?
geronim
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-782?page=comments#action_12316425
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-782:
---
Step 3 use a template gbean for the WSContainer link. The web service builder
fills in part, the ebj builder fills in part.
R
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-156?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-156:
---
Fix Version: 1.0-M3
Resolution: Won't Fix
This web console seems to be defunct; current efforts are on donated web console
> DEV-02 Release o
Where in maven would this appear? I wonder if we should create a
"geronimo-dependencies" virtual project or something, as opposed to
putting something like this side by side with the proper geronimo
artifacts. What do others think?
geronimo/jars (our output)
geronimo/wars (our dem
Dain, David J, and I talked about management options on IRC. I
put a writeup on the Wiki (top of the page, with the original proposal
below):
http://wiki.apache.org/geronimo/Geronimo_Management_API
I also have an IRC log if anyone cares, but I think the writeup is
more coherent
Not being the one who created GBean.org I can speak for what it is but I'll
throw in my 2c about what I think it could be.
One of the areas that seems to confuse people I've talked to is that
Geronimo is really two things. One the one hand it is a runtime framework
that is independent of J2EE. I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-788?page=comments#action_12316419
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-788:
---
Thanks! (I had asked Pat whether he'd be willing to donate his template under
the ASL since it was the best free one I found
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-788?page=all ]
pat heard updated GERONIMO-788:
---
Attachment: reflection.zip
Template for the console.
> Improved look & feel for web console
>
>
> Key: GERONIMO-7
builder tests are ridiculously overcomplicated
--
Key: GERONIMO-789
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-789
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: deployment
Versions: 1.0-M4, 1.0-M5
We have tested the Geronimo console to work on Pluto
1.0.1 RC2. Last time we tested with RC3 we had some
problems so we decided to stick with 1.0.1 RC2 for
now.
--- Donald Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does this process still apply for Pluto 1.0.1-rc3?
> It looks like they are now producing
Does this process still apply for Pluto 1.0.1-rc3?
It looks like they are now producing 3 JAR files.
If we are spending time integrating the web console
into the sandbox, shouldn't we at least be using the
latest Pluto version and use their file names as
provided?
-Donald
--- Dave Colasurdo <[E
The JIRA entry for the console (GERONIMO-762) has been updated with the
instructions for creating pluto-portal.jar (actually the JIRA contains
the jar as well).
Is the required fix as simple as:
1) Rename pluto-portal-1.0.1-rc2.jar to geronimo-pluto-portal.jar
2) Publish the new jar to the Apac
I think that is the case for the rev you mention, and I'm fairly sure
of it for the current m4 branch. Best way is to try it to find out
:-). I'm 99% sure you will run into no problems as long as you don't
use web services, and 90% sure even if you do use web services.
thanks
david jencks
On
David,
Thanks so much for your answer. Correct me if I
understand incorrectly So we will need the two jar
files to build the files you mentioned below, but we
don't need the two jar files at runtime.
Lin
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, their use has been removed from he
no, their use has been removed from head. In the interests of greater
stability the files that depend on them, although not actually used,
will not be removed from m4.
We do hope to eventually create a working xfire ws implementation, but
I hope we would do that as separate geronimo modules r
Hi all,
I noticed that the latest binary distribution of
geronimo (1.0-169186) contains the following 2 xfire
jar files:
xfire-20050202.jar
xfire-java-20050202.jar
Do we really need them at runtime? Any info is
appreciated.
thanks, Lin
__
Do
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-769?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-769:
-
Fix Version: 1.0-M4
1.0-M5
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in m4
Sending
modules/connector/src/java/org/apache/geronimo/connector
Improved look & feel for web console
Key: GERONIMO-788
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-788
Project: Geronimo
Type: Improvement
Components: management
Versions: 1.0-M5
Reporter: Aaron Mulder
Panagiotis Astithas wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 7/20/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok...fair enough...then how far out would M5 be (estimates)? IMHO,
waiting for the time between M3->M4 cannot be between M4-> M5. If
it is
going to be that long, the
Hi Jules
It sounds like you've been working hard!
I think you might find you run into reliability issues with a singleton
coordinator. This is one of those well known Hard Problems and for session
replication its not really necessary. In essence the coordinator is a
single point of failure an
My 2c...
On the issue of releases there are several different types of folks that are
interested in using Geronimo. Off the top of my head they are:
Techies that want an implementation to play around with and are very
comfortable with an unstable, constantly evolving codebase. (Unstable is
good
Good questions.
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dain, Alan, Hiram, Aaron,
>
> The web site says "The GBean architecture a
> minimalistic kernel and
> server framework for enterprise software."
>
> - What is gbean.org?
> - Is it related to geronimo?
> - Is it a fork of geronimo
Dain, Alan, Hiram, Aaron,
The web site says "The GBean architecture a minimalistic kernel and
server framework for enterprise software."
- What is gbean.org?
- Is it related to geronimo?
- Is it a fork of geronimo code?
- Who should use gbean in geronimo?
- Is the gbean in geronimo dead and burie
At 08:22 AM 7/20/2005, Bruce Snyder wrote:
I'd like to hear some opinions from community members who are not
committers. If you are reading this message and you are not a
committer, PLEASE SPEAK UP! We want to hear your opinion on this
matter.
The more branching and integging you do the less ti
We experimented with this with WLS, it worked pretty well. The nice thing
about webdav is that you can mount it as a file system from windows and
OSX. We also tried a similar experiment with ftp which also worked pretty
well. However, you generally want to script admin commands and there are a
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 7/20/05, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Ok...fair enough...then how far out would M5 be (estimates)? IMHO,
waiting for the time between M3->M4 cannot be between M4-> M5. If it is
going to be that long, then +1000 to get it in now. If it
41 matches
Mail list logo
