On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 09:21:23AM -0700, David N. Welton wrote:
[...]
And I would like an HTTP tester library. I think that if done in this
way, it would be versatile enough to replace ab, and it would also
give people the freedom to experiment with other front ends. Like
someting in Tk,
On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Ian Holsman wrote:
I was wondering if anyone knows of something (preferably using openSSH)
which would allow Apache to authenticate via a SSH keypair.
what i would like ideally is for the browser to use the
passwords/pass-phrases of the ssh-agent running on the local
Hi all!
Günter sent me a binary version of mod_replace. I started trying it
and I couldn't get it to work. At last I found that there is an error in
the example configuration file. Instead of being 'Replace colour color
text/html', it should be 'Replace colour color text/html'. At least
this
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two
developers agree on all of the following topics:
. how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of
developers
. how hard to try not to break binary compatibility
. how much to use 2.0 HEAD as a sandbox for
The ssh tools don't export the operations (signing, checking
signatures).
I looked into teases them out out of the code, for example authfd.c has
the signing code. One could create a command to bootstrap an
authenticated
session and then hand it off to the browser. Bridging auth to unlocked
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two
developers agree on all of the following topics:
. how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of
developers
. how hard to try not to break binary compatibility
. how much to use 2.0 HEAD as a sandbox
Igor,
You have to put the replace entries like this:
Proxy /someloc
Replace colour color text/html
SetOutputFilter REPLACE
/Proxy
ProxyPass /someloc http://Server/someloc
ProxyPassReverse /someloc http://Server/someloc
Best
Is there currently a way to configure apache so that the server
itself suid's to the owner of a page?
ie
Accessing http://hostname/~username
will causes httpd to setuid to username while accessing files with
~username/public_html?
This isn't the same as suexec, which only runs cgis as the
At 08:16 AM 10/15/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two
developers agree on all of the following topics:
. how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of
developers
. how hard to try not to break binary
At 08:16 AM 10/15/2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
After a million messages on related topics, I'm not sure that any two
developers agree on all of the following topics:
. how much to consider the needs of users relative to desires of
developers
. how hard to try not to break binary
Bill Stoddard wrote:
At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a
security fix -requires- a bump). Why 2.1? No technical
Benjamin,
the only way to accomplish this is with the perchild MPM for
Apache 2.0, and only by calling out each and every user. Perhaps
it would be good to add perchild options for mass-user hosting in
the schema you suggest.
Note that each 'user' then has an apache process running in the
Thanks very much, Juan! I tried it and it worked!
-Jatorrizko mezua-
Nondik: Juan Rivera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Bidalia: Asteartea, 2002.eko urriak 15 15:34
Nora: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Gaia: RE: Compiling Apache modules for windows
Igor,
You have to put the replace entries like
At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
suggestion...
2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for subsequent 2.1
series
releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a security fix -requires- a
bump). Why
2.1? No technical reason; purely a PR tactic to
* Jim Jagielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Bill Stoddard wrote:
At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a
security fix
Hi,
I'm facing the following problem :
I'm using 2 auth modules in authoritative mode (if one fail, try the other one).
I have one authorization check (using a require directive) for the first module and
another one for the other module.
My problem is that the second directive as a syntax that
Something I've been hacking on (in the pejorative sense of the word 'hack'.
Look at the patch and you will see what I mean :-). This should apply and
serve pages on Linux, though the event_loop is clearly broken as it does not
timeout keep-alive connections and will hang on the apr_poll() (and
The recent conversations on this list have made me finally realize that I
have been here too long. I need a project that is not the Apache web
server. So, this is my good-bye. I will be unsubscribing from the Apache
web server development lists in the next day or two. I will still be
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first project is the Perchild MPM. It basically works, but there are
bugs.
Can you give some more information?
I'm interested in using the Perchild MPM myself, but haven't because of
the reports that it's buggy.
I'm
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It seems that the 'maintainers', the stodgy 'old men' of the group, want
everyone to row together on bug fixes. That isn't how OS works. The
folks with no interest in tracking down obscure bugs just leave, or
quietly bide their time. The
i'm responding to the head of this thread because i haven't read
the rest of it yet.. so, as usual, my comments may be stale.
Jeff Trawick wrote:
. let 2.0 HEAD proceed as it seems to be going now
:
. let those who are interested (not more than a few would be needed to
make it
-- Original Message --
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 18:27:18 +0200
From: Xavier MACHENAUD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ability to restrict scope of require directive to a single module
Hi,
I'm facing the following problem :
I'm using 2 auth modules in
On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Worth reading...
http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2882203,00.html
On October 2nd; *after* RedHat 8.0 was released he wrote And I
doubt Red Hat will make 2.0 the default install until [...].
Really Impressive Predictions.
I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also
includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list, it
seems that a patch like that is not being looked at favourably by many people :-(
Do you want me to rework that patch so it uses a privata data
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 22:09, Bojan Smojver wrote:
I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also
includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list, it
seems that a patch like that is not being looked at favourably by many people :-(
The MMN
On 15 Oct 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
major number. If the patch added fields in the middle of the
struct, thus breaking binary compatibility, then it would be
a problem.
Even adding at the end can break binary compat, since sizeof(conn_rec)
changes, so you might have 3rd party code that
Quoting Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 22:09, Bojan Smojver wrote:
I have submitted the patch along those lines a few days back, which also
includes an MMN bump. In the light of the latest discussions on the list,
it
seems that a patch like that is not being looked
On Sat, 2002-10-12 at 20:26, Paul J. Reder wrote:
Okay, this takes care of item 4 from the list below. Thanks Brian, saves
me from having to do the commit. :)
What about the other 3? Should they be fixed by the change from
apr_time_t to apr_int64_t? Apr_time_t is really apr_int64_t under
On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:46, Thom May wrote:
* Jim Jagielski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
Bill Stoddard wrote:
At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my
suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for
subsequent 2.1 series releases
29 matches
Mail list logo