On 12/18/2011 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Dec 17, 2011, at 3:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> NOBODY suggested that this proposed subproject go into trunk.
>
> I must have been reading a different thread that you when
> the issue of having these as "subprojects" or "normal modules
Thanks for your advice :-)
Rui Hu
2012/2/27 Nick Kew
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:13:52 +0800
> Rui Hu wrote:
>
>
> > Should I add some compile parameters in apxs?
>
> No, but you should probably have posted to the modules-dev
> list rather than here.
>
> It's not a compile problem, it's a design
On 12/14/2011 2:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 12/13/2011 12:39 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 10:22 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>>> - mod_policy: "HTTP protocol police"
>>>
>>> mod_policy is a set of httpd filters that detect and implement a set of
>>> HTTP protocol checks,
On 12/18/2011 10:45 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2011, at 10:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> I proposed instead that you directly propose mod_policy, one of the
>> three modules, as a core httpd module, because it already has a clear
>> fit and really needs little further review (i
On 2/28/2012 8:11 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> AP_DECLARE_DATA just affects visibility, but the switch to __stdcall
> for AP_DECLARE() is an API change. (important, since AIX needs this
> in 2.4.x)
If they weren't AP_DECLARE()ed before, they weren't exported. Ergo they
are only used internally.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:52 PM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Wed Feb 29 01:52:17 2012
> New Revision: 1294936
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294936&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix MPM DSO load failure on AIX.
>
> Without the proper AP_DECLARE*, these functions used by MPMs
> were not expor
On 2/28/2012 5:47 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 29 Feb 2012, at 12:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>
>> After two months, firehose still didn't obtain another +1, so the vote to
>> incorporate firehose into trunk stands at 3 +1's, 1 -1, and therefore
>> failed the vote for inclusion in trunk.
>
On 29 Feb 2012, at 12:21 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> After two months, firehose still didn't obtain another +1, so the vote to
> incorporate firehose into trunk stands at 3 +1's, 1 -1, and therefore
> failed the vote for inclusion in trunk.
I count 4 +1s on the dev@httpd list:
minfrin, issa
>
> >
> > License acceptance is one thing. I dunno what the copyright issue is.
>
> Again,m copyright is just something "nice", such as:
Michael, would it be possible to clarify? There is nothing in the license
> for httpd that obligates an end user to accept a license before installing,
> so if
Graham,
After two months, firehose still didn't obtain another +1, so the vote to
incorporate firehose into trunk stands at 3 +1's, 1 -1, and therefore
failed the vote for inclusion in trunk.
There are 4 +1's for a firehose subproject at httpd. If you wish to continue
this effort you can keep th
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:26 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> > On 28 Feb 2012, at 3:48 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >> Is this really ready? The trunk version (if even tested on trunk) at
> >> best barely works, and this hasn't seen many eyes
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:26 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>>> I don't have access to an AIX machine, so can only rely on Michael's
>>> judgement for this. Given that we aren't awash with AIX expertise, we need
>>> to put some trust in the person
On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:26 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> I don't have access to an AIX machine, so can only rely on Michael's
>> judgement for this. Given that we aren't awash with AIX expertise, we need
>> to put some trust in the person doing the packaging, the same as we do for
>> Netware and oth
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal?
Regards,
Bing
Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] wrote on 2012年2月24日 20:57
>
> w00t!!!
>
> On Feb 23, 2012,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2012, at 3:48 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> Is this really ready? The trunk version (if even tested on trunk) at
>> best barely works, and this hasn't seen many eyes.
>
> I don't have access to an AIX machine, so can only rely on M
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
> Thanks for the "hats off", and I agree that claiming ownership is not simple
> - did not feel right to PKG it as
> AIXTOOLS, so I used what I thought was the convention in the build/pkg
>
> In pkginfo the PKG is ASFhttpd, and I thought ASFhttp
Hello,
I have a module which creates a thread using pthread_create and then
registers for SIGRTMIN+4 signal from another process. Problem is I do not
see a signal callback when the signal is sent to me. I only see it when I
try to kill apache where just before dying it hits the signal callback.
S
it was easy to reset -- cp /etc/httpd/original/httpd.conf /etc/httpd
But I shall remember that for the future!
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:37 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 27.02.2012 23:14, Michael Felt wrote:
>
>> LoadModule unixd_module libexec/mod_unixd.so
>> #LoadModule heartbeat_module libexec/
Thanks for the "hats off", and I agree that claiming ownership is not
simple - did not feel right to PKG it as
AIXTOOLS, so I used what I thought was the convention in the build/pkg
In pkginfo the PKG is ASFhttpd, and I thought ASFhttpd.httpd was a silly
name, so I shortened the PKG to ASF.
Assump
On 28 Feb 2012, at 3:48 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Is this really ready? The trunk version (if even tested on trunk) at
> best barely works, and this hasn't seen many eyes.
I don't have access to an AIX machine, so can only rely on Michael's judgement
for this. Given that we aren't awash with AI
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 10:46 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>> wrote:
>>> # /usr/local/bin/httpd -V
>>> AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: No MPM loaded.
>>
>> if this post were from Joe User,
On 2/28/2012 10:46 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> wrote:
>> # /usr/local/bin/httpd -V
>> AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: No MPM loaded.
>
> if this post were from Joe User, I'd ask:
>
> what were your MPM-related configure arguments?
> are
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:40 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wrote:
> # /usr/local/bin/httpd -V
> AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: No MPM loaded.
if this post were from Joe User, I'd ask:
what were your MPM-related configure arguments?
are you using the httpd.conf created for that build or one from
# /usr/local/bin/httpd -V
AH00534: httpd: Configuration error: No MPM loaded.
On Feb 26, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
>> We're already using the
>>
>> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/"/>
>>
>> to tell Google not to index the pages, although that's not (yet) on all of
>> the 1.3 doc pages - Unfortunately that's something of a manual process due
>> to the fa
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:06 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: jim
>>> Date: Tue Feb 28 12:06:53 2012
>>> New Revision: 1294600
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294600&view=rev
>>>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:57 PM, wrote:
> Author: minfrin
> Date: Mon Feb 27 22:57:18 2012
> New Revision: 1294380
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294380&view=rev
> Log:
> AIX: Add build scripts for AIX.
> Submitted by: Michael Felt
Is this really ready? The trunk version (if even t
On Feb 28, 2012, at 7:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:06 AM, wrote:
>> Author: jim
>> Date: Tue Feb 28 12:06:53 2012
>> New Revision: 1294600
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294600&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Merge r1243651 from trunk:
>>
>> Check during config tes
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:13:52 +0800
Rui Hu wrote:
> Should I add some compile parameters in apxs?
No, but you should probably have posted to the modules-dev
list rather than here.
It's not a compile problem, it's a design problem.
You're trying to use data that's private to another module.
That
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 12:30:48 -0500
Rich Bowen wrote:
> We're already using the
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/"/>
>
> to tell Google not to index the pages, although that's not (yet) on all of
> the 1.3 doc pages - Unfortunately that's something of a manual process due to
> the fa
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:06 AM, wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Tue Feb 28 12:06:53 2012
> New Revision: 1294600
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294600&view=rev
> Log:
> Merge r1243651 from trunk:
>
> Check during config test that directories for access logs exist
>
> PR 29941
CH CH CH
31 matches
Mail list logo
