Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

+1 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 14:33, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post > RC promotion): > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page > > Staging repository: > htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

+1 (binding) Freeman On 2012-4-5, at 下午8:33, Jamie G. wrote: Hi, We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page Staging repository: https:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 04/05/2012 02:33 PM, Jamie G. wrote: Hi, We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page Staging repository: htt

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

OK did the typical key, artifact, notice checking and except for some known, minor and non-blocking issues everything looks good on that front. The source packages build well, exactly as the tag, on "Windows 7 x86_3" and "Linux coprime 3.2.12-1-ARCH x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 870 @ 2.93GHz Ge

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

+1 non-binding. Source code builds on CentOS 6, Windows 7, and Vista. Same sorts of issue Ionnis cited, but no blockers. - Mike Van (All links open in new tabs) Committer - Kalumet Atraxia Technologies Mike Van's Open Source Technologies Blog -- View this message in context: http://kara

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

you're right, Christian - the table implementation is simple enough that a full-blown service might be excessive for my immediate needs. moreover, importing packages is already a kind of service consumption. for better or worse, i might have gotten carried away with my enthusiasm for OSGi. all t

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

I think it would make sense to user the karaf.util project for that. Currently we just inline it into projects but we could also make it a bundle. We could move the table functionality and other general tools there. Christian Am 05.04.2012 19:32, schrieb Claus Ibsen: Well I am talking about a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

Just built the src distro https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-008/org/apache/karaf/apache-karaf/2.2.6/apache-karaf-2.2.6-src.tar.gzand all looks well. Fourth time's the charm? :) +1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Jamie G. wrote: > Hi, > > We resolve

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

It makes sense, and I'm not against at all from a technical perspective (see my e-mail replied to Ioannis). Regards JB On 04/05/2012 07:32 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: Well I am talking about an end user library which has utility methods so people can use that in their Karaf commands / plugins. The

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

For 2.3.x, I'm fully agree and it's the purpose. Really, don't get me wrong, I have no problem to merge that in Karaf 2.2.x. It's just that it could be a good message for the users in order to say: "hey guys, look what it's cool in Karaf 3.0.0" ;) Regards JB On 04/05/2012 07:31 PM, Ioannis C

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

Well I am talking about an end user library which has utility methods so people can use that in their Karaf commands / plugins. The irony is that Karaf is all about modularity. So would it not be possible to offer a neutral Karaf library that people can use on both 2.x and 3.0. I assume the table

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

True, but releasing 3.0.0 should not block us from delivering functionality to 2.2.x or even 2.3.x. -- *Ioannis Canellos* * FuseSource ** Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com ** Twitter: iocanel *

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

Hi Claus, From a feature perspective, of course it's cool ;) But more we merge new feature on Karaf 2.2.x, more we postpone Karaf 3.0.0, as users won't update to Karaf 3.0.0. From a technical perspective, I'm fully agree with you, table rendering is interesting (whatever the Karaf version is

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > We have an implementation of the console table available. > > You can take a look: > > ./shell/console/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/shell/console/table > > but it's only available on trunk for now (so in the next Karaf

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

If you like you can use the table impl JB mentioned to make some of the 3.0.0 tables prettier. For reference you can look at the package/command module where the new table is already used. Christian Am 05.04.2012 17:14, schrieb Reuben Garrett: i'm working on patching Camel's Karaf commands

Re: table printer for Karaf commands

Hi Reuben, We have an implementation of the console table available. You can take a look: ./shell/console/src/main/java/org/apache/karaf/shell/console/table but it's only available on trunk for now (so in the next Karaf 3.0.0). I don't think it's a good idea to merge on Karaf 2.2.x, as we dec

table printer for Karaf commands

i'm working on patching Camel's Karaf commands to print more nicely (columns aligned regardless of a field's length) [1]. unfortunately, my first attempt's implementation was a little too heavy, and would benefit from code reuse. i recently observed a JIRA [2] which suggests that Karaf may have b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

Can you open an issue and document what you experienced? Christian Am 05.04.2012 16:42, schrieb Ioannis Canellos: Did a quick walkthrough through the cli. Experimented with misc projects and everything looks cool. What I didn't like at all is the user experience with the choose url. The idea i

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

A few weeks ago, I spent some time trying to tune up a bit the startup time of karaf and made a few modifications to private copies of felix framework, file install and karaf. I'll try to bring them backs that they can be part of the next releases, but those are not major modifications, so nothing

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

Did a quick walkthrough through the cli. Experimented with misc projects and everything looks cool. What I didn't like at all is the user experience with the choose url. The idea is fantastic, but I didn't have a smooth experience with none of the features I choose: Some of them have outdated urls

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

Ok, Do you have an advice about one vs the other. I have realized some bench on the registry and equinox 3.7.1 seems to perform better than Felix 4.0.1. Is there any other rooms for investigation? Class loading ... Romain. Le jeudi 5 avril 2012, Jean-Baptiste Onofré a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > yo

Re: Equinox vs Felix startup time

Hi Romain, you mean that one is longer than the other ? on which version ? I didn't notice that. Regards JB On 04/05/2012 02:40 PM, Romain Gilles wrote: is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix startup time? Does it due to a different approach of class loadi

Equinox vs Felix startup time

is there any body that can explain the difference between Equinox and Felix startup time? Does it due to a different approach of class loading? There is a mention in the Karaf documentation about deadlock in Felix during module dependency resolution. Does it exist also in equinox? Thanks in advan

[VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 RC#4

Hi, We resolved 78 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachekaraf-008/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 - RC#3

As per the noted issues I'm cancelling this vote, and will pick up the patches, then re-cut. Cheers, Jamie On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Good point Andreas, > > My bad: I tested only the binaries. > > Agree to -1 (binding). > > In that case, we could: > - apply th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 - RC#3

Good point Andreas, My bad: I tested only the binaries. Agree to -1 (binding). In that case, we could: - apply the Andreas' patch on src assemblies - apply the Christian's patch on the start level Regards JB On 04/05/2012 12:00 PM, Andreas Pieber wrote: OK, typically I simply checkout the ta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 - RC#3

OK, typically I simply checkout the tag and check if the build is successfully there; then I check the locally build assemblies and try to run them. Finally I download the assemblies and also run them (besides the typical notice, keys, ... check). After all this had been successfully I upgrade my p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 - RC#3

+1 Thanks Freeman On 2012-4-4, at 下午11:49, Jamie G. wrote: Hi, We resolved 76 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/karaf-2.2.6-release.page Staging repository: https://

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Karaf 2.2.6 - RC#3

+1 (binding) Tested in different projects without problem. Regards JB On 04/04/2012 05:49 PM, Jamie G. wrote: Hi, We resolved 76 issues in this release (web page will be published post RC promotion): https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/karaf/site/trunk/src/main/webapp/index/community/download/ka