Hi
Dan Ohnesorg pravi:
OK, I will try to open it as official project, probably it will make more
people aware of this.
cheers
dan
Any news on this?
Regards
Robert Ludvik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
Dne Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 06:20:47PM +0100, Robert Ludvik napsal:
> Dan Ohnesorg pravi:
>
> >We can also ask for the language upon submitting the entry.
> >
> >But if people should use it, the submission should be easy and fast.
>
> By default the OOo language should be checked, but if user wants
On 02/11/2006, at 3:50 AM, Robert Ludvik wrote:
Dan Ohnesorg pravi:
We can also ask for the language upon submitting the entry.
But if people should use it, the submission should be easy and fast.
By default the OOo language should be checked, but if user wants
to, he/she can change the l
It sounds very interesting, especially for the languages without any
existing spellchecking dictionaries, neither pure wordlist, nor
language model based ones.
But I would refrain from distributing the dictionaries without
approving each word first.
Regards,
Aiet
---
Dan Ohnesorg pravi:
Dne Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Simon Brouwer napsal:
I have some thoughts on the technology preview. First, I'm not sure if
anonymous contributions should be allowed. Without a real name and
contact information it may be too difficult to establish if the
inform
Rafaella Braconi pravi:
Hi,
referring to the below:
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them
- this is the biggest issue we have now.
can you please be more specific? Who would be entitled to approve/reject
words?
Rafaella
People, working in linguistic are
Hi,
referring to the below:
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them
- this is the biggest issue we have now.
can you please be more specific? Who would be entitled to approve/reject
words?
Rafaella
P.S. I find that this is a real great project!
---
Dan Ohnesorg pravi:
We can also ask for the language upon submitting the entry.
But if people should use it, the submission should be easy and fast.
By default the OOo language should be checked, but if user wants to,
he/she can change the language of submission.
What about macros/whatever f
Dne Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 10:07:13AM +0100, Alex Thurgood napsal:
> Robert Ludvik a écrit :
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> > From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers
> >who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to
> >contribute words into the official s
Dne Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Simon Brouwer napsal:
> I have some thoughts on the technology preview. First, I'm not sure if
> anonymous contributions should be allowed. Without a real name and
> contact information it may be too difficult to establish if the
> information is prope
Robert Ludvik a écrit :
If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-)
Haven't quite mastered that one yet, and to be frank, it's not high up
on my hit list of languages to learn next ;-)
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Alex Thurgood pravi:
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them
- this is the biggest issue we have now.
Well, you can count me in.
Alex
If you speak Slovenian, I'd be honoured ;-)
Robert Ludvik
---
Robert Ludvik a écrit :
Hi Robert,
From my point of view it is terrific idea. I know doctors and lawyers
who are creating their own small dictionaries and would really like to
contribute words into the official spellcheck dictionary. Many small
dictionaries means one big dictionary ;-)
Exa
Hi dan
We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject them -
this is the biggest issue we have now.
this was my only remark when Robert presented its interresting project
Yes, we need the validators and the programers to implement backend and
improve the macro. Generally
Hi Dan,
Dan Ohnesorg schreef:
Hi everyone,
I would like open again project, which seemed stopping after first announce,
even if all audience saw it as very good idea.
The most complete description of project is in Vojta's blog
http://blog.vojta.name/archives/2006/03/26/T15_29_40/
In short it
Dne Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 12:26:06PM +0100, Robert Ludvik napsal:
> I contacted Robert Volja this year and he told me that no one was
> interested in this approach.
Yes, there was only very small interest, I think 3 or 4 people.
> We must find people, who will review all words and approve/reject
Alex Thurgood pravi:
Dan Ohnesorg a écrit :
>> The most complete description of project is in Vojta's blog
> >
> > http://blog.vojta.name/archives/2006/03/26/T15_29_40/
Hi,
So please check it out, diskuss it and help to make decision, if it
will be
official OOo project included in some fut
Dne Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 08:27:09AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton napsal:
> Interesting. You might like to review
> http://documentation.openoffice.org/HOW_TO/word_processing/Howto_import_user_dictionaries.pdf
> which addresses the problem of needing other wordlists. This method does
> not require
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:40 +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> To: dev@l10n.openoffice.org
> Cc: Pootle list
>
> On 30/10/2006, at 9:58 AM, Dan Ohnesorg wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I would like open again project, which seemed stopping after first
> > announce,
> > even if all audience saw it
Dan Ohnesorg a écrit :
Hi,
So please check it out, diskuss it and help to make decision, if it will be
official OOo project included in some future version like DicOOo and
FontOOo.
This looks pretty neat and I'm all for a tool like this. One thing I did
notice is that it only seemed to que
To: dev@l10n.openoffice.org
Cc: Pootle list
On 30/10/2006, at 9:58 AM, Dan Ohnesorg wrote:
Hi everyone,
I would like open again project, which seemed stopping after first
announce,
even if all audience saw it as very good idea.
The most complete description of project is in Vojta's blog
h
Hi everyone,
I would like open again project, which seemed stopping after first announce,
even if all audience saw it as very good idea.
The most complete description of project is in Vojta's blog
http://blog.vojta.name/archives/2006/03/26/T15_29_40/
In short it is about collection words, which
22 matches
Mail list logo
