[MINA 3] package name

2013-03-18 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Hi guys, I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not use OSGi). Thoughts ? -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny w

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-18 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the > org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? > > That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already > has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-18 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : > On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the >> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? >> >> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-18 Thread sebb
On 18 March 2013 18:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the >>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? >>> >>> That

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Julien Vermillard
+1 On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, sebb wrote: > On 18 March 2013 18:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : > >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny > wrote: > >> > >>> Hi guys, > >>> > >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to renam

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit : > I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we > are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every > one will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still > ... ;-) > If you rename the Java package you als

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Arnaud bourree
2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny : > Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit : >> I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we >> are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every >> one will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still >> ... ;-) >> I

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 3/19/13 10:20 AM, Arnaud bourree a écrit : > 2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny : >> Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit : >>> I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we >>> are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every >>> one will have switched to another

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Jens Kapitza
Am 19.03.2013 11:02, schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny: Le 3/19/13 10:20 AM, Arnaud bourree a écrit : 2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny : Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit : I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure eve

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread Alan Cabrera
On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the >>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ? >>

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-19 Thread sebb
On 19 March 2013 15:46, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > >> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : >>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >>> Hi guys, I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the

Re: [MINA 3] package name

2013-03-20 Thread Emmanuel Lécharny
Le 3/19/13 8:07 PM, sebb a écrit : > On 19 March 2013 15:46, Alan Cabrera wrote: >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: >> >>> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit : On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote: > Hi guys, > > I was wondering