Hi guys,
I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already
has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not use OSGi).
Thoughts ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
w
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
>
> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which already
> has a dependency on MINA2 (and does not
Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
>>
>> That would help those who embed the lib in an application which
On 18 March 2013 18:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
>>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
>>>
>>> That
+1
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 3:00 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 18 March 2013 18:44, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> > Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
> >> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to renam
Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit :
> I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we
> are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every
> one will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still
> ... ;-)
> If you rename the Java package you als
2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny :
> Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit :
>> I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we
>> are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every
>> one will have switched to another NIO lib in the mean time, but still
>> ... ;-)
>> I
Le 3/19/13 10:20 AM, Arnaud bourree a écrit :
> 2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny :
>> Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit :
>>> I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we
>>> are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure every
>>> one will have switched to another
Am 19.03.2013 11:02, schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny:
Le 3/19/13 10:20 AM, Arnaud bourree a écrit :
2013/3/19 Emmanuel Lécharny :
Le 3/19/13 3:00 AM, sebb a écrit :
I mean, this is something we might have to deal with. I know that we
are taking all our time to get Mina 3 our, so that we are sure eve
On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
>>> org.apache.mina package to org.apache.mina3 ?
>>
On 19 March 2013 15:46, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>
>> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
>>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>>
Hi guys,
I was wondering if it wouldn't be a good idea to rename the
Le 3/19/13 8:07 PM, sebb a écrit :
> On 19 March 2013 15:46, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>> On Mar 18, 2013, at 11:44 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
>>
>>> Le 3/18/13 6:58 PM, Alan Cabrera a écrit :
On Mar 18, 2013, at 9:57 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I was wondering
12 matches
Mail list logo