Re: svn commit: r1828233 - /ofbiz/ofbiz-framework/trunk/applications/accounting/src/main/java/org/apache/ofbiz/accounting/finaccount/FinAccountServices.java

Hi all, thanks for the feedbacks. I created a Jira at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11341 I noticed that this is also present in the 16.11 release branch. Should it be backported there also? If not, do we have a standard way to provide fixes for old releases which might not b

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

Hello Taher, Taher Alkhateeb writes: > I can sense frustration from Mathieu regarding getting things moving > forward. You are correct. > I would just like to note that it's really not _that_ bad! You've > already gotten a lot of commits rolling into the code base (which is > fantastic) and y

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

Michael Brohl writes: > I think depends-on is a point we already have discussed and this was > not my topic in the latest emails. My proposal to write up a concept > is adressed to the "big picture" you have described in [1], which > contains your statement: > > "Here is a *big* change that I am

Re: [ofbiz-plugins] branch trunk updated: Implemented: Have a Country Dimension (OFBIZ-10954)

Nicolas, A ticket regarding the service to populate the dimension is available in JIRA. See OFBIZ-10954. In that ticket I suggested a solution approach for the assignee (or anyone else) to evaluate before I submit a pull request. Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

Hello Folks, I can sense frustration from Mathieu regarding getting things moving forward. I would just like to note that it's really not _that_ bad! You've already gotten a lot of commits rolling into the code base (which is fantastic) and you didn't get objections on most of them. In fact many c

Re: [ofbiz-plugins] branch trunk updated: Implemented: Have a Country Dimension (OFBIZ-10954)

Hi, On 30/01/2020 16:51, Michael Brohl wrote: > Hi Pawan, all, > > I really don't see any reason to introduce tables into the codebase > which are not used anywhere in the current functionality. > > I would recommend to wait until there is substantial functioanality > which use these table. As Pie

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

Hi Mathieu, I'm not sure if we understand each other correctly and maybe talk at cross-puposes. Hope you are open to read my comments inline... Am 05.02.20 um 15:34 schrieb Mathieu Lirzin: Hello, Michael Brohl writes: Am 31.01.20 um 13:15 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: We could continue the

Please add me as an Apache OFBiz Contributor

Hello everyone, I would like to ask you to add me as an Apache OFBiz Contributor. My Confluence username is: wpaetzold Thanks and kind regards, Wiebke

Re: Removing “base/config/component-load.xml”

Hello, Michael Brohl writes: > Am 31.01.20 um 13:15 schrieb Jacques Le Roux: >> >> We could continue the discussion in this thread or at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-11296 > > > This issue shows exactly the same pattern in the process like the > component-load approach. The Jir

Re: [DISCUSSION] bi/birt component integration

I think Jacopo got it just right! BI to me means a collection of complex queries and services that give insightful information (not necessarily even visual). Birt on the other hand is a specific tool that makes it possible to design and create reports interactively using a drag-and-drop behavior a

Re: [DISCUSSION] bi/birt component integration

My main concern about this proposal is that the BI component is intended to provide a "universal data model" (of dimensions, facts and star schemas) for OLAP that is independent from the specific tools adopted to actually perform the analysis (reporting tools, user interfaces etc...); its role for