With the exception of the ppt master slide text, the content looks consistent
across the POI file types.
Found two bugs in my eval code, but no regressions that would hold up the
release :)
r 15, 2016 9:15 AM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)
Hi,
The mem-leak patch looks good and sane!
I am still not sure how they end up with such a large amount of allocated
memory for one file, but it is surely better to not keep the buffers if we do
not need th
I'm finally taking a look at the new exceptions from the reports.
Most of the new exceptions seem to be on attachments within ppt. We recently
changed how we handle embedded ole-wrapped attachments in ppt, and we're
discovering new embedded file types. [1]
Next...to look at the content report.
gt; Thank you, Andi!
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David North [mailto:dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk]
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 4:16 AM
> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)
>
> OK, current status:
>
> * I'll take a l
who use HSLF about whether to hold up
>> another RC for the issue below.
> I've already patched the HSLF issue yesterday
Thank you, Andi!
-Original Message-
From: David North [mailto:dtn-...@corefiling.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 4:16 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.o
David North wrote
> * I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up
> another RC for the issue below.
I've already patched the HSLF issue yesterday, based on the placeholder
being a metroblob shape,
but I wanted to think about it, if this is really a good idea or if a
diff
OK, current status:
* I'll take a look at the patch on TIKA-2058, if it's low-risk it can go in
* I could do with input from those who use HSLF about whether to hold up
another RC for the issue below.
I may not have time to roll RC3 tonight; if not I'll do it tomorrow
night which gives us all the
The HSLF footer text regression is still open.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60003
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2013
On Sep 14, 2016 12:43 PM, "Dominik Stadler" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd also rather keep it as is to not break it multiple times.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Wed,
Hi,
I'd also rather keep it as is to not break it multiple times.
Dominik.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> CellValue#getCellType was changed to return an enum after the 3.14 release.
> I reverted that signature change in r1760607 (see bug 59791 comment 13).
>
> For bug 5
Hi,
I would rather look at using some tools like
https://github.com/siom79/japicmp on the CI machine and check the output on
a regular basis or fail the build if there are incompatible changes. This
way we do not rely on having unit-tests for a method and the old source
often will not compile any
Regression results are here. I haven't had a chance to look. This compares
Tika's trunk with poi 3.15-rc1 (? I think?) against 3.15-beta1 in Tika 1.13.
Some differences might be changes at the Tika level.
I ran this against the full corpus so there are file formats we don't care
about.
http
t: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 12:09 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)
Thanks - sounds good. I guess I'd better change my +1 to a -1 and try to build
a fresh RC tomorrow night.
On 13/09/16 17:06, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> I will commit a fix for this today with
I read through all the commits mentioned in the bugs that block bug 59836.
These changes, excluding ClientAnchor.getAnchorType(), were made after the
release of POI 3.14, so I could safely revert back to the original getter
behavior. I have left ClientAnchor.getAnchorType() returning AnchorType
enu
CellValue#getCellType was changed to return an enum after the 3.14 release.
I reverted that signature change in r1760607 (see bug 59791 comment 13).
For bug 59907, I broke backwards compatibility for ClientAnchor (both HSSF
and XSSF) in r1716313 (first appeared in POI 3.14 beta 1 and included in
P
Could we do some checks for backwards compatibility? We need to test an
application written for a previous version of POI that exercises most or
all of the features, and what better than to use the unit tests from a
previous release plus the latest source code? This will include false
positives suc
$ ant -v
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.4 compiled on April 29 2014
Trying the default build file: build.xml
This is on a windows machine though so it may have some specific non-os
specific paths in the tests. Which I still have not looked at.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 10:34 PM, Javen O'Neal wrote:
Thanks - sounds good. I guess I'd better change my +1 to a -1 and try to
build a fresh RC tomorrow night.
On 13/09/16 17:06, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> I will commit a fix for this today with the goal for backwards
> compatibility.
>
> Here's the plan:
> getX() returns int
> getXEnum() returns enum
>
I will commit a fix for this today with the goal for backwards
compatibility.
Here's the plan:
getX() returns int
getXEnum() returns enum
setX(int)
setX(enum)
I will also take a look at bug 59907 (client anchor enum)
On Sep 13, 2016 6:58 AM, "David North" wrote:
> Javen, any thoughts on this o
Javen, any thoughts on this one?
On 13/09/16 12:14, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really hate to delay this further, but unfortunately we have a similar
> problem in class CellValue as we tried to fix in Cell in RC2, the
> getCellType() is now an enum whereas it was an int before, so somethi
Hi,
I really hate to delay this further, but unfortunately we have a similar
problem in class CellValue as we tried to fix in Cell in RC2, the
getCellType() is now an enum whereas it was an int before, so something
like the following in user-code does break in POI 3.15:
CellValue cellValue = chec
What version of Ant are you using to build POI and run the unit tests? It's
working fine on my computer with Ant 1.9.6.
On Sep 12, 2016 14:42, "Aram Mirzadeh" wrote:
>
> I sort of ran this on the run, so haven't had a chance to look at it yet
> but if github is up to date, scratchpad failed with:
hy B.
> wrote:
>
> > Kicked off regression tests. Should have results by tomorrow.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David North [mailto:dno...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:47 PM
> > To: POI Developers List
> > Subjec
1, 2016 3:47 PM
> To: POI Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> My apologies for going AWOL in the middle of the last release attempt. I
> didn't anticipate that we'd find problems in review twice in a row, and
> things have b
Kicked off regression tests. Should have results by tomorrow.
-Original Message-
From: David North [mailto:dno...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2016 3:47 PM
To: POI Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 (RC2)
Hi everyone,
My apologies for going AWOL in the middle
Hi everyone,
My apologies for going AWOL in the middle of the last release attempt. I
didn't anticipate that we'd find problems in review twice in a row, and
things have been very busy for me at work lately. However, I've now
rolled a second RC for 3.15.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi
25 matches
Mail list logo
