On 05/17/2010 04:41 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> I have drafted an announcement of the upcoming TC7 release for our first
> blog post. It can be previewed here:
>
> http://blogs.apache.org/preview/tomcat/?previewEntry=apache_tomcat_7_released
>
> Suggestions for improvements welcome.
>
> Note the li
On 05/02/2010 10:52 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> On 05/02/2010 04:02 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
>> -// endpoint.processSocket(this.socket,
>> SocketStatus.STOP);
>> +try {
>> +asyncDispatch(SocketStatus.STOP); // What to do
>> with retu
On 04/30/2010 08:51 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> There is a difference in Comet API that will require all TC6 Comet
> applications
> to be patched and recompiled before deploying them to TC7:
>
> Comet classes were moved from "org.apache.catalina" to
> "org.apache.catalina.comet".
>
> What do
On 04/28/2010 05:14 AM, Karl San Gabriel wrote:
> Is this valid for non-US citizens?
There is a list j...@apache.org for ASF related jobs, please use that
one for this topic.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u
On 04/14/2010 07:22 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 11:34, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on 7.0.0-RC1
>> [X] Beta - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Beta based on 7.0.0-RC1
>> [ ] Stable - go ahea
On 04/14/2010 04:13 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 04/14/2010 03:35 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> The APR gives some errors for example Address already in use:8080
>> on my Linux box. All other test/plaforms look ok.
>
On 04/14/2010 03:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/04/2010 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>>> The 7.0.0-RC1 tag is
>>> [ ] Broken - do not release
>>> [ ] Alpha - go ahead and release 7.0.0 Stable based on
On 04/14/2010 12:34 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After the experience of the recent 6.0.x releases, I wanted to try an
> alternative approach and use explicit release candidates for 7.0.x. I'm
> expecting to tweak the release process as we go.
>
> The first Tomcat 7 release candiate is ready
On 04/05/2010 06:11 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> next protocol negotiation
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agl-tls-nextprotoneg-00.html
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For addi
On 04/01/2010 06:30 AM, Mahesh Fernando wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 28/03/2010 17:16, Mahesh Fernando wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I'm interested about JSR 196 implementation idea. I have some questions.
>>> is there anyone to mentor this project?
>> [1]
On 03/22/2010 05:40 AM, Rajeev Sampath wrote:
> Thanks Mark for your reply.
>
> Though it's not mandatory, if it's going to be useful, then I'll continue
> working on it and prepare a proposal.
>
> The other idea which seemed to be interesting is the one on implementing a
> connector to support S
On 03/18/2010 05:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:19 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
>>> planner need your proposals by yesterday.
>>
>> Well they were asking that the 16th,
On 03/18/2010 05:05 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/18/2010 05:00 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>> Note we have until the Sunday, March 21st to collect that information.
>>
>
> I'm always amazed with the fact that each conference
> planner need your prop
Hi,
We all want to see a Tomcat track at the ApacheConNA2010, don't we?
I have created a wiki page to collect the presentation proposals.
Fell free to add the stuff you would like to present at the ApacheCon.
The tomcat PMC will review it and then propose it to the planners of
conference.
Note w
l
> 0: Filip
>
> RESULT: Passes
>
>> 6. Require some indication in the commit message for code that usually is
>> covered by RTC, that this commit was done using C-T-R rule.
>
> +1: Mladen, Rainer, Bi
The JIRA are needed just for http://tinyurl.com/asfgsoc
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.26 stable. This release includes bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache Tomca
On 03/11/2010 05:27 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> More important one is to use the web server connectors directly.
> It's not about speed, but about eliminating connector as a
> point of failure.
>
hm You still have to move the data for httpd (in C) to Tomcat (in JAVA)
so you still have a connector, n
On 03/11/2010 03:44 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Somehow http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/ as of now displays a
> set of empty folders.
>
> Maybe that will fix itself in few minutes (e.g. if replication is
> still in progress)??
>
> I looked at file permissions at p.a.o, and do not see
Stable [6]
So I will go on with the release process.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/10/2010 06:54 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 10/03/2010 17:46, Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 17:35 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Wed Mar 10 17:35:43 2010
>>> New Revision: 921464
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921464&view=rev
>>> Log:
On 03/11/2010 08:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/11/2010 07:52 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/10/2010 11:10 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>>
You want to have each webapp served by a different process ?
Or even different v
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.26/
According to the release process, the 6.0.26 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 03/09/2010 04:59 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> And to include french translations fixes :)
those are r920841
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
On 03/09/2010 04:58 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/9 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> Do not forget to update both
>> version.minor
>> version.suffix
>
> I meant
> version.build
> version.suffix
Yep. I will double check that.
-
T
On 03/09/2010 01:47 AM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Overall, We'd be better off leaving everything as it is.
> 6.0.24 had a huge amount of changes, and also a series of rapid
> regressions, and probably more to follow.
> To keep the branch stable, we should work in a stable manner, RTC has
> w
On 03/08/2010 12:01 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/3/8 jean-frederic clere :
>> On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>> On 06/03/201
On 03/08/2010 09:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 08/03/2010 08:09, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sund
On 03/06/2010 10:55 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 06/03/2010 06:54, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
>> Monday.
>> Comments?
>
> +1. Do you really mean release on Monday?
hm... Star
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.26 on Sunday evening (Neuchatel time) and release on
Monday.
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apac
On 03/05/2010 09:24 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
> Hi to all,
>
> I sent some patches to Jean-Fred about the LocalString_fr.properties.
I have noticed it is in fact fix in trunk but not in tc6.0.x I have
submitted a new proposal. Please double check... It is not my day today :-/
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On 03/05/2010 06:28 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Fri Mar 5 17:28:00 2010
> New Revision: 919515
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919515&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote and comment.
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STAT
On 03/05/2010 06:28 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: rjung
> Date: Fri Mar 5 17:28:00 2010
> New Revision: 919515
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=919515&view=rev
> Log:
> Vote and comment.
>
> Modified:
> tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STATUS.txt
>
> Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/STAT
Hi,
Just that JIRA stuff has been created for the GSoC. Should we move our
entries there?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&requestId=12314021
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: d
-Rex
>
> 2010/3/3 Mladen Turk
>
>> On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>
>>> Stable [3]
>>> Broken [2]
>>>
>>> So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
>>>
>>>
>> And few
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomc
On 03/02/2010 08:54 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Time for another one folks? Should I tag end of this week?
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-
On 03/02/2010 05:47 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 03/02/2010 05:43 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
>>> New Revision: 917921
>>>
>>> URL: ht
On 03/02/2010 09:51 AM, mt...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue Mar 2 08:51:46 2010
> New Revision: 917921
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917921&view=rev
> Log:
> Add unafe legacy renegotiation support
How does that interacts with
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881179&vi
On 02/25/2010 01:07 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
> So far all looks OK - but due to the version issue - I vote:
> [X] Broken
>
> I believe rebuilding with an updated properties (no retag needed) should
> fix the issue.
Yep it is just a packaging problem.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 02/23/2010 04:06 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> [X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
Looks ok in all my builds.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
On 02/24/2010 01:27 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> As I'm sure you've seen from the slew of commit messages, I've been
> through the 6.0.x status file and applied all the eligible patches.
>
> The only patch I think we need to have for 6.0.25 that doesn't have
> enough votes is the fix for
> https://iss
On 02/19/2010 05:19 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 02/19/2010 05:06 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Not a mod_proxy guru, but filtering X-header from responses should be
>>> near
>>> trivial based on past experience with the proxy code.
>>
>>
>> There is the GPL licence 'problem' of the Hyperic lib which s
On 02/17/2010 10:46 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
>> On 02/17/2010 07:37 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The reasons I suggest using SPDY as a replacement for AJP - and supp
On 02/16/2010 05:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 16/02/2010 14:03, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
>>> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were
On 02/16/2010 12:52 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mainly a question for Jean-Frederic, but what are the thoughts on aiming
> for a 6.0.25 release quite soon? There were a handful of regressions in
> 6.0.24 it would be good to fix.
>
+1 on my side :-)
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On 02/10/2010 11:19 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Native 1.1.20 is available for testing.
> Compared with 1.1.19 and earlier versions it has a bug fix that
> prevents crashing JVM on shutdown.
>
> If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
> downloaded from:
> http://tomc
On 02/10/2010 09:32 AM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Wed Feb 10 08:32:11 2010
> New Revision: 908386
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=908386&view=rev
> Log:
> Just a ref to Not a vulnerability in Tomcat.
>
Should I put the work-around in the "Not a vulnerability i
On 02/08/2010 08:25 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a nasty bug that crashes the JVM on shutdown cause
> by Library.terminate call while we are inside Socket.accept
>
> The reason for crash is that we reference later in code the
> memory that was already destroyed with apr_pool_terminate
On 01/29/2010 03:29 AM, Jason Brittain wrote:
> Maybe you have a conflicting jsch jar file that ends up getting loaded in
> front of the
> correct/newer version. Look for all jsch jars on your machine and see what
> versions
> they are, and maybe temporarily (re)move older ones.
It seems I have o
ks!
> --
> Jason Brittain
> MuleSoft http://www.mulesoft.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:47 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
>> Tomcat 6.0.24 stable. This release includes many bug-fixes o
On 01/22/2010 07:37 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> With r902006 and r902008 applied, the changelog.xml of trunk is now
> rendered as HTML by certain browsers. It works for me in Firefox 3.6
> and in IE 7.0. You can try it yourselves by the following link:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tom
On 01/22/2010 07:01 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/1/21 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2010/1/21 Mark Thomas :
>>> On 21/01/2010 04:33, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We have 6 binding Stable votes.
>>>> I'll
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat 6.0.24 stable. This release includes many bug-fixes over Apache
Tomcat 6.0.20.
Note that is version has 4 zip binaries: a generic one and three
bundled with Tomcat native binaries for different CPU architectures.
Apache
Hi,
We have 6 binding Stable votes.
I'll proceed with copying the files to
dist, updating the web pages and make an Announcement.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional c
On 01/19/2010 01:59 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/ generated from /native/trunk,
> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/ ?
>
> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
> for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.
>
> There are two errors:
>
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.24/
According to the release process, the 6.0.24 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.24 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomca
On 01/15/2010 10:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> According to my tests:
> EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later).
java/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.java setValue exceptions are missing (Look
in http://java.sun.com/javaee/6/docs/api/javax/el/ArrayELResolver.
On 01/14/2010 11:47 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> The subject says it all really. Still no sign of the TCK so there are
> probably some bugs in my understanding/interpretation of the spec.
According to my tests:
EL : 11 failures. (They looks similar I will have a closer look later).
JSP : 1 failures. (
lease some things which
is not TCK compliant.
Rollback r899138 should fix those TCK issues, no?
Cheeers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Filip
>
> On 01/14/2010 07:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/t
On 01/14/2010 04:51 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/01/2010 14:23, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
>> [
On 01/14/2010 04:01 PM, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> doco stuff you can go right ahead and change without status IIRC
I was about to do it but we have
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/TomcatVersions that could replace it.
Should I use the link to the wiki?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.23/
According to the release process, the 6.0.23 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
Hi,
I plan to tag 6.0.23 tomorrow lunch time (~13h00 my time).
Please complain if that is not ok.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomca
On 01/08/2010 11:15 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
>>> Any comments on including the experimental SPDY support (
>>> http://www.chromium.org/spdy/spdy-protocol ) ?
>>> I know we had countless debates on JK2 and http proxies, but some extra code
>>> to try out doesn't hurt :-)
>>
>> We need a httpd module (
On 01/07/2010 05:50 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 06/01/2010 00:27, Costin Manolache wrote:
>>> Also, I would like to know if other comitters are OK with (temporarily -
>>> i.e. until the 7.0 release vote) including lite in the tomcat7 b
On 01/07/2010 01:01 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>>
>> Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.19 is:
>>
>
> I know it's a pickle season, and you guys
> are all busy digesting Christmas and New Year eve's
> meals, but can I have some votes here :)
Yep, I am still wasted (my stomach at least).
+1 I had some problems
On 01/06/2010 07:47 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> On 01/06/2010 01:21 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2010/1/5 Mladen Turk:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Native 1.1.19 is available for testing.
>>> Compared with 1.1.18 It has minor versioning fix and allows building
>>> against
>>> OpenSSL 1.0 (well Rainer beat me b
On 01/04/2010 06:01 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> What is the use of the file
>
>native/srclib/VERSIONS
>
> in tcnative?
>
> Ib the 1.1.x branch it contains the info:
>
> =
> Use the following version of the libraries
>
> - APR 1.2.8, http://apr.apache.or
On 01/04/2010 08:50 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2010/1/4 :
>> Author: rjung
>> Date: Mon Jan 4 16:58:04 2010
>> New Revision: 895700
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=895700&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix apr version test i tcnative trunk.
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/native/trunk/native/b
On 01/04/2010 01:25 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> I removed the libtcnative-1.dll files of Tomcat Native 1.1.18 from
> www.apache.org/dist/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/native/1.1.18/binaries
>
> Those were the wrong ones, dynamically linked with apr and ssl,
> as already discussed in t
On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
>> [X
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before
next week and before enough votes
On 12/23/2009 01:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 23/12/2009 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Servlet TCK passes
JSP TCK passes - 1 failure
This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The
fix for bug 47453 created a regressi
On 12/23/2009 10:35 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/23:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Dec 23 09:28:08 2009
New Revision: 893443
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893443&view=rev
Log:
my votes.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893375&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=893378&
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 23.12.2009 00:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2009/12/22 Mark Thomas:
(...)
Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the
patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before
the tag.
Mark
+1 to re-tag.
And
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
Servlet TCK passes
JSP TCK passes - 1 failure
This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The
fix for bug 47453 created a regression in that the constraint expressed
in JSP.2.3.4 namely thatA String literal can be provided, as
lo
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
The differences are only the tcnative windows binary files: tcnative was
broken in the previous try.
On 12/22/2009 10:32 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 22/12/2009 09:11, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binari
On 12/21/2009 11:43 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 21.12.2009 22:36, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Dec 21 21:36:07 2009
New Revision: 892991
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892991&view=rev
Log:
Only update the build file that doesn't change the minimum tcnative
version re
On 12/22/2009 09:28 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Up till now we always had tcnative-1.dll not libtcnative-1.dll
so it's just broken build comming from private builds,
because there is no 1.1.18 binaries in w.a.o/dist/
Meaning:
1. Wrong tcnative
2. Build is not reproducable
I'd say the packaging is bro
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21/
According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-ma
On 12/21/2009 09:20 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Dec 21 20:20:02 2009
New Revision: 892964
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=892964&view=rev
Log:
my vote.
I have commit the corresponding thing. the remaining patch need more
work. I will tag now.
Cheers
Jean-F
Hi,
Later today I will tag and go for the release, make sure all the patches
you want to see in are committed :-)
It will also add binaries for tc-native
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubsc
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.18 stable. This release includes few bug fixes over
Apache Tomcat Native 1.1.16 and fixes the client initiated part of
cve-2009-3555, note that the server initiated renegociation was added in
1.1.17 (and is
On 11/23/2009 03:23 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
It seems there is a bunch of KEYS file in the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat and in the web site.
Should we only have one of those?
> find . -name KEYS
./tomcat-4/KEYS
./tomcat-5/v5.5.28/KEYS
./tomcat-5/KEYS
./tomcat-5/v5.5
Hi,
It seems there is a bunch of KEYS file in the
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat and in the web site.
Should we only have one of those?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.o
On 11/19/2009 09:41 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
It works with the update tarball :
The updated tarball is now available at
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/1.1.18/
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsu
On 11/19/2009 08:51 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
did you run buildconf ?
jnirelease.sh should have done that...
Investigating...
I'm running SnowLeopard
I still have to update my box
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
2009/11/19 jean-frederic clere:
On 11/18/2009 09:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
On 11/18/2009 09:43 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
JF, could you provide a new tarball with the configure included.
I couldn't built it under OS/X since buildconf failed about missing :
cp: /usr/bin/build/apr_common.m4: No such file or directory
cp: /usr/bin/build/find_apr.m4: No such file or directory
On 11/18/2009 05:44 PM, sebb wrote:
On 18/11/2009, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Wed Nov 18 14:34:47 2009
New Revision: 881789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881789&view=rev
Log:
Add my new key and remove the old one.
Just the old one will be too short soon
Hi,
Native 1.1.18 is available for testing.
Compared with 1.1.17 It just contains the fix for CVE-2009-3555
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/1.1.18
Some binaries will be available
On 11/17/2009 08:46 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 16/11/09 14:35, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 11/16/2009 02:28 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Well native is Commit-Then-Review. Mladen please commit.
Done.
Do you wish to tag the 1.1.18?
Yes.
If do, don't forget this time to d
On 11/16/2009 02:28 PM, jfcl...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jfclere
Date: Mon Nov 16 13:28:11 2009
New Revision: 880742
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=880742&view=rev
Log:
My vote.
Well native is Commit-Then-Review. Mladen please commit.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
Modified:
tomcat/nat
On 10/26/2009 03:31 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 21:55 +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
So we +3
On 10/20/2009 09:55 PM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
Native 1.1.17 is available for testing.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/
Some binaries will be available at:
http
Hi everyone,
There is a Tomcat meetup organized at the ApacheCon on Monday 2d of
November at 20h00.
To register
http://spreadsheets.google.com/viewform?formkey=dEJLcHk3c1ZrRm8tWUNYeXZZckN0Vnc6MA
For more information or add idem you want to present go to
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/Tomcat
Hi,
Native 1.1.17 is available for testing.
If you want to take a look, the final source distribution can be
downloaded from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/source/
Some binaries will be available at:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-connectors/native/binarie
401 - 500 of 763 matches
Mail list logo
