Fedora and EPEL.
So I'm going to sign up to be a co-maintainer for rubygem-rhc, and
rubygem-json-pure (a new dependancy for rhc).
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11/30/2011 07:07 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:25:25 -0600
> Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I've been creating rpm packages for Fermi Linux for over 10 years, and
>> Scientific Linux 8 years, but I never had time to do anything for
>&
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-bind
rubygem-openshift-origin-dns-nsupdate
rubygem-openshift-origin-msg-broker-mcollective
rubygem-openshift-origin-node
I will also go through and make sure any pending review requests are
closed as well.
Please let me know if there are any questions.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
to localhost connections.
Keep up the good work.
Troy Dawson
[1] - https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/qt-virt-manager/
[2] - %{make_build} isn't in rhel7 rpm macros.
@@ -74,14 +74,14 @@
mkdir %{cmake_build_dir}-qt4
pushd %{cmake_build_dir}-qt4
%cmake ..
- %{make_build}
+
pends on them.
Troy Dawson
[1] - https://github.com/mozilla-iot/gateway/releases
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 05/09/2012 03:07 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> I know I've said this before, but: we should break the CD size
>> barrier
>> precisely so people can't burn things to CDs. If you must burn to
>> optical media, do yourself a favor and burn a DVD, the reduced seek
>> time
>> is entirely worth it.
>
acing Existing Packages [1]
but I guess your script is just being extra cautious.
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
hem like yum does?
--- Is there an easy to find option to turn them off/on?
Thanks
Troy Dawson
[1] - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074600
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 06/27/2014 09:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> The fact that Fedora practically forces people to use delta rpm's has
> rattled my cage for quite a while.
>
>
> [Snipped]
>
>
On 06/27/2014 10:45 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>
>
>
> It is a hidden default that is not in any man page or documentation.
> Yes, I used a poor choice of words.
>
>
> man yum.conf
&g
re people's thoughts on bringing it into Fedora 16, Fedora 17,
EPEL6 and EPEL5?
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
> It is currently going through the normal channels for rawhide and Fedora 18.
>
> 10gen has a very good track record for being backwards compatible.
> According to their d
On 10/09/2012 06:23 AM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote:
> Dan Horák wrote:
>> Troy Dawson píše v Po 08. 10. 2012 v 14:48 -0500:
>>> On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
>>>> It is c
On 10/09/2012 09:51 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 10/08/2012 09:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>> On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
>>> It is currently going through the normal channels for
On 10/09/2012 10:18 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> On 10/09/2012 09:51 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
>> On 10/08/2012 09:48 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>> On 10/05/2012 04:43 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I have updated mongodb from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0.
>
On 07/15/2013 04:26 PM, Jonathan Masters wrote:
On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:11, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 07/15/2013 10:44 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: No Default Syslog =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NoDefaultSyslog
Change owner(s): Lennart Poettering ,
Matth
ses these errors?
What is a good way to track down a solution to "error: reference to
'uint32_t' is ambiguous"?
Thanks
Troy Dawson
[1] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1540/5951540/build.log
[2] http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1545/5951545/build.
On 09/18/2013 06:45 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 03:29:19PM -0500, Troy Dawson wrote:
What is a good way to track down a solution to "error: reference to
'uint32_t' is ambiguous"?
Sorry for the multiple mails but after looking at the source I think I
se
in Fedora, and so forth. At the third
level of dependencies, I figured there had to be a more official way.
If I missed a Fedora web page on it, or it was in the recent hardening
discussion, feel free to point me to it.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On 06/06/2013 03:36 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi,
Is there an official Fedora way for telling is something is hardened
correctly?
I'm working on hardening mongodb, and I think I have it right, but I'd
really like to check.
I was given a couple of scripts, which had dependencies not
me know.
Thanks
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 02/08/2013 11:54 AM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hello,
> A couple of months back I asked about updating MongoDB from 2.0.7 to
> 2.2.0 in EPEL6 and Fedora 17.
> Although it is backwards compatible, there were several bugs brought up
> that people wanted fixed in Mongodb 2.2.x before w
Hi Jaroslav,
I had updated our page to say that we were 95% complete, and I thought
we were. But our first tests found a major cgroups bug, that has been
fixed in our latest release, that just was finished yesterday.
In short, yes, we are complete, but there is going to be a major update
of packa
Hi,
I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
Troy Dawson
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> Hi,
> I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
> I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the notification
> that the EPEL6 version was being orphaned because of filters.
> Troy Dawson
>
Hi All,
This has turned o
On 02/25/2015 10:23 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 25.2.2015 v 17:18 Troy Dawson napsal(a):
>> On 01/09/2015 02:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I will be taking ownership of html2text on EPEL6.
>>> I am already the maintainer for EPEL7, but I missed the not
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 6:15 AM Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le mercredi 25 mars 2020 à 13:09 +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova a écrit :
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 12:48 PM Miro Hrončok
> > wrote:
> > As I mentioned in the previous mail, branching goes against the
> > purpose of the effort.
>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:52 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 06:11:28PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Sunday, 29 March 2020 at 15:59, Mattia Verga wrote:
> > > Is there a way to get the package list and their version available in
> > > RHEL8? For exampl
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 9:22 AM Leon Fauster wrote:
>
> Am 17.04.20 um 17:00 schrieb Troy Dawson:
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:07 AM Leon Fauster
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I am unsure if this is something for RHEL8 or EPEL8:
> >>
> >> The
On a RHEL8 machine, doing a
dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-lockfile
dnf repoquery --whatrequires python2-lockfile
Shows that the following depend on it
duplicity
python3-fedora
pungi-legacy
I haven't checked EPEL7 yet.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 4:46 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> Hi
On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 10:49 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/1/20 1:10 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0700, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> Generally speaking (I can make this a separate thread if that helps) - do
> >> we
> >> expect every package i
All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
maintainer would pick it up. And after that I asked if they would
mind if I maintained it in EPEL8. About half of those the maintainer
was fine with me maintaining the package in EPEL8.
So, to answer your question, yes you can.
On
giflib-devel is a sub-package of giflib.
It is already in RHEL8 and Centos8, just not in the BaseOS or AppStream repo's.
For CentOS 8 it is in the PowerTools repo
dnf config-manager --enable PowerTools
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 1:29 PM Mateo wrote:
>
> Hi EPEL developers.
>
> I am using Centos
laps with the Fedora Minimization efforts.[6]
Square 1 hopes to utilize, rather than duplicate, their efforts. And
maybe some tools created for Square 1 can help the minimization
efforts.
Thoughts?
Ideas?
Comments?
Troy Dawson
[1] - Square 1 is at the heart of Ring Zero
[2] - This has nothing to do
On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 8:00 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > I would like to introduce a plan I call Square 1 [1][2]
> >
> > There are two goals to Square 1.
> > The first is to get, and keep, the c
tps://github.com/fedora-modularity/depchase?
> That basically does what you are doing and with some small changes it
> can perform much more things.
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:27 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 2:58 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
rts (I'm currently doing EPEL stuff), but I feel it would fit in
with my RHEL9 and Fedora IoT efforts. Plus, I'm always trying to get
installs and systems as small as possible.
Troy Dawson
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 8:44 AM Pablo Sebastián Greco
wrote:
>
>
> El 7/8/19 a las 12:30, Stephen John Smoogen escribió:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:52, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all.
>>
>> While building my Fedora packages for EPEL8, got a very strange error on
>> aarch6
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:40 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 16.08.2019 6:22, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I assume this is because LibRaw is available in RHEL but only for x86_64
> > and ppc64le?
>
> The same as Pidgin and lots of other apps/libs. You need to add
> "ExclusiveArch: x86_64 pp
ge in container needs to add a user, then
systemd is pulled in and that container grows by up to 60M.[2]
Minimizing containers, both in the short term and long term, are
important to the minimization team. We have opened an issue for
this.[3]
Any ideas on what we recommend to users?
Troy Dawso
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 10:34 AM Daniel Walsh wrote:
>
> On 9/17/19 8:04 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019, at 12:45 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> >> systemd-sysusers seeks to unify user creation[1]. It also has the
> >> benefit of being abl
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet wrote:
> > Le 26/09/2019 à 11:36, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> > > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> > >
> > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:56 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 06:38:45AM -0700, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 6:11 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 03:01:25PM +0200, Remi Collet
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 10:48 AM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Pierre-Yves Chibon writes:
>
> > Here is what the vision we came to and that we would like to discuss:
> >
> > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests
> > ○ Pull-requests are automatically tested
> > ○ Every commit to dist-g
tment it deserve for the next 6 to 9 months. With EPEL-8 still
> ramping up and the various opportunities with modularity, I do
> not think it is a fair that EPEL suffers from this lack of time.
>
> As such, I would like to step down as chair/member of the steering
> committee and no
On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> == Open Questions ==
> 1) For the "canary" Fedora ELN rebuild, we have two choices on how to
> select the git hash to be built for each package in the ELN list:
>
> Approach 1 (Rawhide-style):
> 1. Clone each package
> 2. Check for the ex
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 2:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 24. 01. 24 v 10:51 Aoife Moloney napsal(a):
> >
> > All other milestones remain the same at this time and the published
> schedule[4] has been updated to reflect these changes.
>
> https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-t
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:26 AM Benson Muite
> wrote:
>
>> If there is a build failure for a package on ELN, does anything need to
>> be added to a package spec file? Currently
>
>
> It varies wildly from package to package. Sometime
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 8:23 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 6:42 AM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:26 AM Benson Muite
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If there is a build failure for a package on ELN, does anyt
On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 10:05 AM Sergey Mende wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 8:23 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> > What package(s) are you having problems with?
> Troy,
>
> the package in question is libClipper2 [0] that undergoes the review
> presently. It is not go-related
Hello,
Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
7.6, but with numbers higher than 7.
There are many, many packages with something like the following
if 0%{?fedora}
%define with_python3 1
%endif
If you have something like that, please change it to something like th
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 01/12/2018 06:08 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-01-11 01:02 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
>>
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:52 AM James Cassell
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > For Nodejs, Fedora should only package:
> > * The interpreter, development headers
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == How To Test ==
> >
> > * Install all nodejs libraries in Fedora 33. Try to update to Fedora 34.
>
> What is the plan wrt Obsoletes of the removed packages?
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
We do not pl
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:07 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 10 December 2020 at 00:49, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
> > > * Policies and guideline
nage project-level installations (NPM, yarn, etc.).
> > * Packages that provide binaries that users would want to use in their
> > shell.
> > * compiled/binary nodejs modules (for now)
> >
> > == Owner ==
> >
> > * Name: [[User:tdawson| Troy Dawson]]
>
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> >
> > ...
> > * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> Should there be an update of:
>
> https://docs.fedora
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:42 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 9:56 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 11:21 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> >>> == How To Test ==
> >>>
> >>&
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 2:45 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > == Scope ==
> > * Proposal owners:
> > We will go through the Fedora release and determine what nodejs
> > packages Fedora should package. We will implement nodejs library
> > bundling on those we alr
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 9:32 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people
> > outside the SIG (it states that this is also affecting pa
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 3:52 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 12/9/20 7:44 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > ...
>
python-nnpy
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-node
mozilla-iot-gateway-addon-python
Outside of themselves, there is nothing that depends on these packages.
Troy Dawson
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 10:32 AM Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 8/3/2020 9:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:32 PM Gary Buhrmaster
> > > wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:15 PM Richard Hughes
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Most of t
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.9 that the latest
> > ELN release of python3.9 is behind Fedora.
> >
> > I've assumed the build has fail
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 2:19 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 1:34 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 08:07:24PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > I've noticed at https://src.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 12:10 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Michel Alexandre Salim writes:
>
> > * Have an expedited flow where this SIG can request EPEL branches and
> > admin access to packages if there are no response from package
> > maintainers for a set period (3 days? 1 week?)
> > * wheth
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 12:20 AM Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> I am the maintainer of rubygem-liquid package in Fedora. Every now and
> then is receive notification that this package has been built and
> updated for eln, for example [1,2].
>
> I have been trying to understand why this package is includ
The following "applications" source rpm's start with nodejs, and have
a binary in /usr/bin/ They have either had their dependencies
bundled, or did not have any nodejs library dependencies.
nodejs-buble nodejs-linefix nodejs-nodemon
nodejs-replace-require-self nodejs-shelljs nodejs-supervi
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Davide Cavalca via devel
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit
> > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda
>
> One thing I'd be interested in
I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
week's ELN meeting.
Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
in Fedora and not ELN.
Solution: Create ELN Extra for those extra packages
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:25 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> I'm sending this out now so I don't have to say all this in this
> week's ELN meeting.
>
> Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> that either is only in Fedora, or that has depen
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:55 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 19. 03. 21 15:25, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > Problem: Users might want to test ELN for their own package/product
> > that either is only in Fedora, or that has dependencies that are only
> > in Fedora and not
First, it looks like the ELN composes have been broken for a while.
It's failing on "Cant locate template for uri 'runtime-install.tmpl'"[1]
but lorax-templates-generic is installed.[2]
I'm at a loss on this one.
Second, I thought we were shifting ELN Composes to just be once a day. It
looks like
I wrote the following script a while ago to check on the ELN
composes.[1][2] It's not fancy, and the webpage it outputs isn't fancy,[3]
but it works. It's a good starting point for checking ELN Composes.
I thought I'd share it before the ELN meeting tomorrow so people would have
a chance to look
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 9:21 AM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make
> the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off
> rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues
> with this proposed appr
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:00 AM Daniel P. Berrangé
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:30:42PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> > I have started the process to update userspace-rcu to 0.13 in rawhide
> which
> > implies a soname bump to 8.
> >
> > From what I understand, the following packages will
This might not warrant a meeting, but it's something that just came up.
ELN-Extra
I never went beyond the Content Resolver initial setup, because there
weren't any real requests.
But now I am getting one.
Will the new ELN build implementation be able to do ELN Extra?
It would need to pull from the
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 3:05 PM Carl George wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 3:21 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> > On 21. 09. 24 20:00, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2024-09-21 at 10:03 +, bugzi...@redhat.com wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> Please note that this comme
78 matches
Mail list logo
