On Thursday, 8 January 2015 at 12:18:37 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 1/6/15 8:16 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/6/15 3:44 PM, weaselcat wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries
linked from
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
I don't think I have to point out the problems with
http://dlang.org/library/std/algorithm/find.html
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 22:43:45 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Let's crowdsource the review. Please check the entries linked
from here: http://dlang.org/library/index.html.
Andrei
I think there needs to a clear separation between the end of the
overview (e.g. the cheat sheet in std.a
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 23:39:17 UTC, Manu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 6 January 2015 at 04:11, via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 16:08:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Yeah, in my misc repo, there used to be stand along image.d
and
simpledisplay.d. Now, they both depend
On Tuesday, 6 January 2015 at 09:12:43 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 21:15:00 UTC, Zach the Mystic
wrote:
Hello everybody. My name is Zach, and I have a suggestion for
the improvement of D. I've been looking at the following
stalled pull request for a while now:
https:/
On Monday, 5 January 2015 at 21:15:00 UTC, Zach the Mystic wrote:
Hello everybody. My name is Zach, and I have a suggestion for
the improvement of D. I've been looking at the following
stalled pull request for a while now:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/1877
...in which Wa
On Friday, 2 January 2015 at 21:03:44 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 1/2/2015 1:34 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/1/15 1:59 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I do however still think that using $( ) to delineate start
and end of
macro blocks is a bad choice given the preva
On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 04:13:18 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
There is a rub though. Not only you're telling what we'd need
to do to be more successful, you're also telling us how to do
it. Please don't. We are not adding type qualifiers to D if we
can avoid it, and generally we want
On Thursday, 25 December 2014 at 20:15:11 UTC, Vlad Levenfeld
wrote:
I was looking at some of the PRs for DIPs and was wondering how
to go ahead and use them in my code. A few of the forum regulars
have mentioned applying their own patches before, and so I would
like to ask those of you that do,
On Friday, 19 December 2014 at 06:47:31 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 19 December 2014 at 00:55, Chris via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 December 2014 at 14:34:10 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
So to sum things up
1. you blindly walked into something you had no real
exper
On Thursday, 18 December 2014 at 10:24:46 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 17 December 2014 at 20:33, ketmar via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:48:26 +
Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
std.container.Array(T) if(is(Unqual!T == bool)) vs.
std.container.Array(T)
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 19:39:08 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 19:01:19 +
Jeremy DeHaan via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I don't understand your desire to avoid github, but what ever
your reasons if you are willing to write updates for D there
should be a way f
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 15:26:57 UTC, Mengu wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:44:03 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:27:30 UTC, Mengu wrote:
p.s. i know i have your sympathy because of my all lower-case
writing despite the hate we get. :-)
Ah! That's why
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 15:00:56 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 14:33:51 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:01:35 +0200
Shachar Shemesh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
Please consider the following program:
import std.exception;
void main()
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 11:27:30 UTC, Mengu wrote:
p.s. i know i have your sympathy because of my all lower-case
writing despite the hate we get. :-)
Ah! That's why I can never parse ketmar's posts at a glance and
keep getting lost. Full stops followed by capital letters make
great vis
Is there an official download available that has the source for
dmd, druntime, phobos and tools, but not the binaries as well?
Github releases provide this, but of course that bypasses the
download counters, which isn't ideal.
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:52:04 UTC, Artem Tarasov wrote:
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 10:37:23 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
it is simply too far away effort-wise from something that can
be used.
Contributing something new to C++ standard library - now THAT
is hard :) In D is simply a matter
On Monday, 15 December 2014 at 08:54:24 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:19:01 +1100
Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
"ketmar via Digitalmars-d" wrote in message
news:mailman.3160.1418550079.9932.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
> but talking seriously, i do
On Sunday, 14 December 2014 at 23:27:15 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I think I said that clearly: "What do you get when you take a
pointer
of a function with an auto-ref
arg? ...an error, because it's not actually a function!"
What's baffling to me is why even declare a function pointer
paramete
On Thursday, 11 December 2014 at 21:41:11 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 12/11/2014 4:47 AM, Manu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 07:29, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 12/7/2014 6:12 AM, Dicebot wrote:
But from existing cases it doesn't seem working good enough.
For
On Thursday, 11 December 2014 at 13:55:55 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 11 December 2014 at 12:48:05 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 8 December 2014 at 07:29, Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On 12/7/2014 6:12 AM, Dicebot wrote:
But from existing cases it doesn't seem work
On Thursday, 11 December 2014 at 09:07:18 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:57:56 +
Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
>>
>> Storing it as body IR accomplishes nothing practical over
>> storing it as source file, i.e. .di files.
> except that there's no n
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 15:53:40 UTC, Martin Nowak
wrote:
On 12/09/2014 05:22 PM, John Colvin wrote:
which of course Kenji already has a pull for, less than 3
hours later :)
It's right on time, it's right on time
Still doesn't work though:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 11:07:34 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
Hello guys,
I want to work on optimisations in the semantic analysis stage.
Could you chime in with thoughts about what can only be there
and not in llvm-ir for example ?
Thanks Stefan
Well it really depends how descriptive
On Wednesday, 10 December 2014 at 12:04:13 UTC, Daniel Murphy
wrote:
"bearophile" wrote in message
news:pibnlncyjzetohcnw...@forum.dlang.org...
The #[no_std] attribute is used to avoid the runtime in Rust.
Do we have any use for a @noruntime attribute in D?
All @noruntime functions are also
On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 12:36:29 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 22:10:09 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/08/2014 06:05 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Well gcc gives me:
Tried that with dmd, it gave me.
bug.d(5): Error: incompatible types for ((a) >= (l)):
'__vector(ulon
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 22:10:09 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/08/2014 06:05 PM, John Colvin wrote:
Well gcc gives me:
Tried that with dmd, it gave me.
bug.d(5): Error: incompatible types for ((a) >= (l)):
'__vector(ulong[4])' and '__vector(ulong[4])'
bug.d(5): Error: incompatible typ
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 23:40:21 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 12/08/2014 06:20 PM, John Colvin wrote:
To conceptually get what it's doing here, the trick is that
it's
offsetting the values so as to simulate unsigned comparisons
using
signed instructions.
All too easy, but would've tak
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 17:05:09 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 16:32:50 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I want to do bounds checking of 2 (4 on avx) ulongs (64-bit)
at a time.
ulong2 vval = [v0, v1];
ulong2 vlow = [low, low];
ulong2 vhigh = [high, high];
int res = PMOVM
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 16:32:50 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I want to do bounds checking of 2 (4 on avx) ulongs (64-bit) at
a time.
ulong2 vval = [v0, v1];
ulong2 vlow = [low, low];
ulong2 vhigh = [high, high];
int res = PMOVMSKB(vval >= vlow & vval < vhigh);
I figured out sort of a solut
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 16:32:50 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
I want to do bounds checking of 2 (4 on avx) ulongs (64-bit) at
a time.
ulong2 vval = [v0, v1];
ulong2 vlow = [low, low];
ulong2 vhigh = [high, high];
int res = PMOVMSKB(vval >= vlow & vval < vhigh);
I figured out sort of a solut
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 08:25:36 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
As a result, it is impossible to use thing like bitfields in
templates.
I'm trying to do something like
struct MySuperStruct(E) {
enum DataSize = ulong.sizeof * 8 - EnumSize!E;
import std.bitmanip;
mi
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for
heap storage?
I think people are a bit distracted with the scope proposal at
the moment.
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 12:09:20 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 10:31:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
After changing the benchmark to more carefully measure the
integration function (ldc was unfairly taking advantage of
knowing a and b at compile-time), scala does indeed win
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 11:02:21 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 10:31:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:46:02 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
08-Dec-2014 01:38, John Colvin пишет:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:13:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansk
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 09:46:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I thought I could make this work, but it's a problem. There are
two meanings for scope when attached to a function:
T func() scope; // the 'this' pointer is 'scope'
scope T func(); // the function returns a 'scope' T
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 11:40:25 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 11:02:21 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg
wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 10:31:46 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:46:02 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
08-Dec-2014 01:38, John Colvin пи
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:46:02 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
08-Dec-2014 01:38, John Colvin пишет:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:13:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
08-Dec-2014 00:36, John Colvin пишет:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 19:56:49 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
06-Dec-2014 1
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 09:52:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 09:46:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
I thought I could make this work, but it's a problem. There
are two meanings for scope when attached to a function:
T func() scope; // the 'this' pointer is 'scope
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 22:13:50 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
08-Dec-2014 00:36, John Colvin пишет:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 19:56:49 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
06-Dec-2014 18:33, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d пишет:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 03:26:08PM +, Russel Winder via
Digit
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 19:56:49 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky
wrote:
06-Dec-2014 18:33, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d пишет:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 03:26:08PM +, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
primitive are passed by value; arrays and user defined
types are
passed by refer
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 15:44:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Sunday, 7 December 2014 at 15:41:12 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Haha, oops. I meant 40 hours * 5 days a week * 50 people =
1 man hours of work. Still a lot.
The long work hours is why the US is ahead of
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 21:21:49 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 20:32:54 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I agree. It's not just about conservation of resources and
power,
though. It's also about maximizing the utility of our assets
and
extending ou
On Thursday, 4 December 2014 at 09:25:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP69
Despite its length, this is a fairly simple proposal. It adds
the missing semantics for the 'scope' storage class in order to
make it possible to pass a reference to a function without it
being poss
On Monday, 1 December 2014 at 09:48:20 UTC, Paolo Invernizzi
wrote:
Hi,
Just to know if someone else has the same issue:
OS X 10.10.1 Xcode 6.1 (6a1052d)
cc --version Apple LLVM version 6.0 (clang-600.0.54) (based
on LLVM 3.5svn)
DMD is builded just fine:
DMD64 D Compiler v2.067-devel
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 16:12:19 UTC, Don wrote:
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 15:50:05 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 03:36:01PM +, Don via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
Suppose D had a type 'natint', which could hold natural
numbers in
the range 0.
On Friday, 21 November 2014 at 13:39:43 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
I trust everyone here knows about the "builder" pattern
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Builder_pattern)? It can be very
useful when the number of (optional) arguments in a function
start to run rampant, and you know the user only wa
On Thursday, 20 November 2014 at 15:40:40 UTC, Araq wrote:
Most of the statements I disagreed with were opinions.
"unsigned" means "I want to use modulo 2^^n arithmetic". It
does
not mean, "this is an integer which cannot be negative".
Opinion.
Using modulo 2^^n arithmetic is *weird*.
Op
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 11:04:05 UTC, Matthias Bentrup
wrote:
On Wednesday, 19 November 2014 at 10:03:35 UTC, Don wrote:
On Tuesday, 18 November 2014 at 18:23:52 UTC, Marco Leise
wrote:
Am Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:01:25 +
schrieb "Frank Like" <1150015...@qq.com>:
> but now ,'int' is e
On Tuesday, 18 November 2014 at 13:35:46 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:33:51 +
FrankLike via Digitalmars-d wrote:
If you migrate your projct from x86 to x64,you will find the
length is error,you must modify it ,such as:
int i= (something).length
to
size
On Friday, 14 November 2014 at 16:28:41 UTC, Chris wrote:
Any work done in D regarding NumPy?
pyd[1] has the ability to convert to/from d slices from/to numpy
arrays as part of its quite comprehensive python-D interface.
[1] https://bitbucket.org/ariovistus/pyd
what's the status?
I tried building druntime with 'make -f posix.mak dll' and got
src/rt/sections.d(52): Error: static assert (is(typeof(__error)
== void* function())) is false
I'd be happy to put in some work to improve the situation, but a
brief overview of the status quo would be useful
On Monday, 10 November 2014 at 10:23:09 UTC, Rikki Cattermole
wrote:
On 10/11/2014 11:04 p.m., bearophile wrote:
Some of the bugs that the static analysis tool Coverty has
found in the
C++ code of LibreOffice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=grep&q=coverity
Cases like th
On Monday, 3 November 2014 at 16:02:23 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
On 10/31/14 3:07 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:04:24PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 10/27/2014 12:42 AM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
I'm planning on doing a pull request fo
On Saturday, 8 November 2014 at 10:03:51 UTC, Jason den Dulk
wrote:
When upgrading my compiler from 2.065 to 2.066.1 I have
encountered problems with some of my extern(C) code.
My declarations (in a .di file) are wrapped in an extern(C)
declaration. The code compiled fine in 2.065. In 2.066.1
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 09:54:44 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 09:07:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 09:00:12 UTC, Meta wrote:
struct Test(T)
{
static if (is(typeof(T) == int))
{
pragma(msg, "test");
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 09:07:10 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 09:00:12 UTC, Meta wrote:
struct Test(T)
{
static if (is(typeof(T) == int))
{
pragma(msg, "test");
this(T t)
{
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 04:34:09 UTC, Jonathan Marler
wrote:
On Tuesday, 4 November 2014 at 02:49:55 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 11/3/14 6:05 PM, Jonathan Marler wrote:
In many cases templates are good because they provide the a
way for the
programmer to use a library optimized f
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 19:38:16 UTC, dan wrote:
What IDE/EDITOR do you use for D? What plugins if you use Vim?
Vim with dutyl and a few other odds and ends.
I'm not really a fan of IDEs, I like syntax highlighting,
auto-completion and go-to-definition etc. but I don't see why I
sho
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 17:36:41 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 05:23:07PM +, Brad Anderson via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Wednesday, 29 October 2014 at 06:59:09 UTC, bearophile
wrote:
>This is very false. I have tons of cases where you only
>iterate
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 17:18:06 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 07:48:16 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
On Saturday, 25 October 2014 at 20:49:26 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Deimos
http://en.docsity.com/news/programming-2/free-libraries-fo
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 13:24:26 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 09:19:26 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 09:10:41 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:42 +0100, Martin Nowak via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Seriousl
On Monday, 27 October 2014 at 09:10:41 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, 2014-10-26 at 23:42 +0100, Martin Nowak via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[…]
Seriously, internet connection, well you can fetch packages
and use them locally.
[…]
Yes seriously, having to have an Internet conne
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 13:17:28 UTC, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 13:05:54 UTC, IgorStepanov wrote:
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 06:04:24 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
On 10/19/14 2:00 PM, IgorStepanov wrote:
Bump.
I've made a few grammar and fluency edits to the DIP,
On Friday, 24 October 2014 at 07:29:24 UTC, tcak wrote:
Most of us print out codes in posts, especially D codes. I use
tabs
instead of spaces in my code editor, and I directly copy codes
from there into a post. Problem is that when a line is too
long, it
becomes multiline mostly due to the very
On Wednesday, 22 October 2014 at 20:32:39 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 10/22/2014 2:31 AM, Shammah Chancellor wrote:
A couple of us working on SDC are trying to get ValueRange
propigation
implemented. I was wonder if someone could offer some
insight as to how VRP
works in DMD. If for exampl
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 11:56:15 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 11:43:32 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
iota(101L).map!((x) => pi * x^^9),
iota(101L).map!((x) => -pi * x^^9)
Shouldn't the last expression be "-pi * (100-x)^^9" ?
Yeah, my
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 10:44:59 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad
wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 08:21:47 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 05:54:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 04:35:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Larger mantissa can h
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 08:21:47 UTC, eles wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 05:54:01 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
On Saturday, 18 October 2014 at 04:35:07 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
Larger mantissa can help a little bit, but only a little bit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K
and vibed.org and forum.rejectedsoftware.com
what up with your servers Sönke?
On Friday, 17 October 2014 at 21:15:47 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
and vibed.org and forum.rejectedsoftware.com
what up with your servers Sönke?
and the dub repository itself...
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 21:33:36 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 21:29:59 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
You have to duplicate the case keyword when declaring case
ranges. Why?
Case ranges are inclusive at both ends of the range, unlike in
foreach. Again, why?
It co
if code like this worked: http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/7ea4eb03f02e
A few reasons why it doesn't:
You have to duplicate the case keyword when declaring case
ranges. Why?
Case ranges are inclusive at both ends of the range, unlike in
foreach. Again, why?
exponential notation (e.g. `2e9`) returns a
On Tuesday, 14 October 2014 at 16:11:34 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"John Colvin" wrote in message
news:ljjtmnnckwzenvhaw...@forum.dlang.org...
[2] By easily managed I don't mean sed-able, or even
tooling-fixable. For me it pivots on being able to maintain
one code-base that will compile with
On Sunday, 12 October 2014 at 11:24:17 UTC, Joseph Rushton
Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 12/10/14 12:53, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
D2 is, for the most part, excellent in this respect, but it
could and should be
even better. Well-managed, well-documented and
well-p
On Monday, 13 October 2014 at 08:48:11 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 10/13/2014 1:29 AM, "岩倉 澪" wrote:
Are there good reasons not to add something like this to the
language, or is it
simply a matter of doing the work? Has it been discussed much?
Named parameters interact badly with overloading
Please test your work with (at least) a few different D compiler
versions.
There have been some recent changes that cause somewhat trivial
incompatibilities between compiler versions, which can be almost
entirely avoided with some care.
A few simple simple considerations to help your code b
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 10:49:53 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Back when I've first introduced RCString I hinted that we have
a larger strategy in mind. Here it is.
The basic tenet of the approach is to reckon and act on the
fact that memory allocation (the subject of allocators) is
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 07:10:08 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 30 September 2014 16:06, Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 04:23:08 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 09/29/2014 04:43 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
You're right that tuples in D cannot conta
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 13:47:22 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 07:10:08 UTC, Manu via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 30 September 2014 16:06, Daniel N via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
On Monday, 29 September 2014 at 04:23:08 UTC, Timon Gehr
wrote:
On 09/29/2014 04:43 AM,
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 10:06:47 UTC, Szymon Gatner
wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 September 2014 at 09:32:05 UTC, Chris wrote:
It's good to hear that. Maybe you could write a short article
about that once you've moved to D. "Porting games to D" or
something like that. With D you can develop
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 14:38:57 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 12:06:16PM +, Uranuz via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sunday, 28 September 2014 at 00:13:59 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
>On 9/27/14, 3:40 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>If we
On Saturday, 27 September 2014 at 22:06:00 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 02:51:14PM -0700, Walter Bright via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
[...]
The only interesting thing is he describes a way that
functions (and
blocks) can specify what global data they access, and t
On Friday, 26 September 2014 at 19:47:15 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
I wanted to bring this over from D.learn, because I've never
seen this before, and it's an interesting solution to creating
a property without much boilerplate.
So here it is:
class Foo
{
union
{
private int
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 11:20:24 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 24 September 2014 at 06:29:20 UTC, Walter Bright
wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/4021
That can be a good case to start with dfix. Its first task can
be rewrite of C-style declarations to D-
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 00:54:40 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
On 9/13/2014 12:23 AM, bearophile wrote:
Is it a good idea to accept code like this, to shorten some
constants?
void main() {
int x = 1e6;
}
1_000_000 solves that problem.
How does adding extra _s help with shortening
On Monday, 15 September 2014 at 02:26:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Walter, Brad, myself, and a couple of others have had a couple
of quite exciting ideas regarding code that is configurable to
use the GC or alternate resource management strategies. One
thing that became obvious to us is w
On Sunday, 7 September 2014 at 20:47:47 UTC, AsmMan wrote:
I'm trying to use a bit of function programming.
In a function like this:
int f(in int[] arr, bool delegate(int) func);
call using:
bool g(int n) { ... }
f(arr, g);
instead of:
f(arr, x => x == 0);
it is possible?
bool g(int n) {
On Sunday, 7 September 2014 at 17:24:46 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
Am 07.09.2014 19:00, schrieb John Colvin:
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-06-zeroing-buffers-is-insufficient.html
D could incorporate something like this, no?
There are some posts on the HN discussion, stating that the
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2014-09-06-zeroing-buffers-is-insufficient.html
D could incorporate something like this, no?
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 14:24:34 UTC, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Friday, 29 August 2014 at 02:21:07 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Dear community, are you ready for this?
Yes.
This is a significant change of behavior. Should we provide a
temporary flag or attribute to disable it?
I do
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 20:02:41 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 21:48, schrieb Christian Manning:
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 17:45:03 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Am 22.08.2014 19:27, schrieb "Marc Schütz"
":
On Friday, 22 August 2014 at 16:56:26 UTC, Sönke Ludwig
wrote:
Am 22.08.2
On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 at 19:15:48 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On the positive side, if these "optional" range methods are
templatized,
they will reduce template bloat in code that doesn't need to
use them.
AFAIK, if you have a template struct with 10 methods, all 10
will get
i
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 12:08:23 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 11:55:02 UTC, Tudor Berariu wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 10:34:02 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg
wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 10:25:39 UTC, Tudor Berariu wrote:
Is it possible to compare at compile time a
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 11:55:02 UTC, Tudor Berariu wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 10:34:02 UTC, Rene Zwanenburg wrote:
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 10:25:39 UTC, Tudor Berariu wrote:
Is it possible to compare at compile time an element from a
TypeTuple with another type?
This code fai
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 10:25:39 UTC, Tudor Berariu wrote:
Is it possible to compare at compile time an element from a
TypeTuple with another type?
This code fails:
alias T = Tuple!(int, bool);
static assert(is(T[0] == int));
Error: static assert (is(Tuple!(int, bool)[0] ==
On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 03:17:06 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
In fact, the whole reason assert is a core language feature
rather than
a library notion is I was anticipating making use of assert
for
optimization hints.
So why is this not documented?
Frankly, it never occurred to me that it
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 17:40:45 UTC, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 31.07.2014 18:29, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
On 7/31/14, 8:37 AM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
When I tell it to write something, I want it to do that, even
if it
might look like nonsense (if anything, it could create a
warning).
I
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 15:26:27 UTC, Artur Skawina via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 07/31/14 15:44, Daniel Gibson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
And don't forget this (rather old) case:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8537
(I really don't get why anyone would want such an
optimization:
On Thursday, 31 July 2014 at 15:37:23 UTC, Daniel Gibson wrote:
Am 31.07.2014 17:26, schrieb Artur Skawina via Digitalmars-d:
On 07/31/14 15:44, Daniel Gibson via Digitalmars-d wrote:
And don't forget this (rather old) case:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8537
(I really don't get
601 - 700 of 855 matches
Mail list logo
