On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 02:07:34 UTC, Norm wrote:
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe
wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 03:07:10AM +, psychoticRabbit via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> Uhh? I don't get...why coders need to write documentation?
[...]
To communicate with other coders who will need to read and maintain the
code.
And by "other coders", of course, I mean yourself, 2
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 19:30:38 UTC, WebFreak001 wrote:
amazing! I planned on adding a documentation tab in the current
dub package overhaul, but I wasn't sure on where to get the
data from, if I can add this to embed on the dub website (ala
iframe) it would make a lot much easier!
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 02:57:08 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Saturday morning, a user complained that several leading dub
packages had poor documentation, if they could find it at all.
That's changing, right now.
Before long, packages without docs are going to suffer. This
will put
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 01:53:23 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
It's a sorry state of affairs. I dream of the day when I can
just write code and documentation as-is, and downstream users
can just use whatever doc formatting system they like and it
will all Just Work(tm).
Join me, and
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 02:26:49 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> But even you, who know how to use ddoc very well and have
> obviously spent some time on it here, made trivial mistakes here
> that just don't happen with adrdox.
Any time you do something manually instead
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 02:07:34 UTC, Norm wrote:
This is really awesome. It would be really cool if this could
feedback a coverage score to code.dlang.org that indicates the
level of documentation in a library. Something like the % of
functions/classes/modules that are documented and
On Tuesday, 27 February 2018 at 01:43:55 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Well, then basically, projects are going to need to decide to
go with adrdox over ddoc if they want clean documentation.
That's right, and I can't imagine anyone is going to put hours of
work into ddoc when they can spend
On Monday, February 26, 2018 17:53:23 H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 06:43:55PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
> Digitalmars-d-announce wrote: [...]
>
> > Well, then basically, projects are going to need to decide to go with
> > adrdox over ddoc if they want
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
package.
[...]
This is really awesome. It
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 06:43:55PM -0700, Jonathan M Davis via
Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
[...]
> Well, then basically, projects are going to need to decide to go with
> adrdox over ddoc if they want clean documentation. They'll probably
> get better documentation with adrdox than the default
On Monday, February 26, 2018 19:51:27 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 15:49:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>
> wrote:
> > Yeah. Any project that uses .ddoc files to define additional
> > macros isn't going to work properly
>
> It is actually more than
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 21:16:07 UTC, Antonio Corbi wrote:
Trying it onto gtk-d got an error saying to send you the
failing link, so here you are :
gtk-d is actually just too big for this, so it timed out. But I
also already made gtkd docs on the main site:
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
package.
Hi Adam!
Thanks for this superb
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 20:04:14 UTC, aliak wrote:
Meta: Is this your stuff btw? ->
https://github.com/skirino/d-option :) me thinks I may have
gotten some inspiration from you if so, so thanks!
Nope. I'm MetaLang on Github.
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 20:15:13 UTC, aliak wrote:
Awesome. good start at least, and just to throw an approach out
there for your consideration, a .adrdox.yml file with a
include/exclude/style/etc keys might be a good way to go.
Yeah, that's basically what I was thinking (though not
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 18:17:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Oh, fixed now. since there's no ddoc at all in that file, it
should have been skipped, I just had a testing "return true;"
in the method I forgot to remove.
Nice :D Looks good.
ketmar sent me a patch to parse a .adrdox_ignore
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 16:02:58 UTC, Dukc wrote:
I kinda start to see the idea... Granted, nullable is in a way
a range that can hold exactly one or exactly zero elements. Not
a bad idea at all.
Aye, ranges do not need nullability indeed. Optional doesn't need
to adhere to the
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 15:49:19 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
Yeah. Any project that uses .ddoc files to define additional
macros isn't going to work properly
It is actually more than that: I don't support user-defined ddoc
macros at all. About 3/4 of the ones I've seen are just link
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 19:47:29 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
It also would be good for you to like to the Dub page and Git
Repo.
Yeah, its on my list. The project homepage from the dub.json too.
Couldn't you provide a robots.txt file which Google should
honor so that 'nofollow' isn't
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
I'd like to get the code.dlang.org folks to add the correct
link to the main package site so people can easily discover
this just put nofollow on it plz so google doesn't trigger
generation of pages people don't actually
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
package.
[...]
amazing! I planned on adding
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 15:21:55 UTC, aliak wrote:
Questions: Tried it with optional and undocumented stuff is
also shown.
Oh, fixed now. since there's no ddoc at all in that file, it
should have been skipped, I just had a testing "return true;" in
the method I forgot to remove.
And
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 15:27:11 UTC, Meta wrote:
The idea is to treat `Option!T` as a regular input range so it
can be used with all the regular range algorithms without
special casing it. You're right in that the null/non-null
dichotomy is equivalent to the notion of a range being
On Monday, February 26, 2018 14:59:07 Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d-
announce wrote:
> It isn't 100% compatible with ddoc. For example, this
> user-defined macro was not expanded:
> http://dxml.dpldocs.info/dxml.dom.html#source
Yeah. Any project that uses .ddoc files to define additional macros
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 15:21:27 UTC, Dukc wrote:
Honestly, I fail to see the idea behind this... Ranges do not
need any nullability on top of them IMO, because an empty range
can already be used to denote a kind of "default", "unassigned"
or "nothing" - type of value.
On the other
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
package.
Simply go to
On Sunday, 25 February 2018 at 18:03:35 UTC, aliak wrote:
Alo,
Just finished up a first take on an optional type for D. It's
essentially a mix of Nullable and std.range.only, but with a
lot more bells and whistles. I would love to hear any feedback
on code, or features, or bad design or
On Monday, 26 February 2018 at 14:59:07 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or
from my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub
package.
This is very much awesome, much
Many of you will already know this from the other thread or from
my twitter, but I just added a on-demand downloader to my
dpldocs.info domain to fetch and build docs for any* dub package.
Simply go to projectname.dpldocs.info/vX.Y.Z/ and it will
generate docs for dub package projectname,
30 matches
Mail list logo
