Marc,
My apologies; I was not aware you were looking for how people managed
to "up-rate" LibreOffice to work better for academic work. In my own
case, I found the "writer's tools" offered by Dimitri Popov as an
extension toolkit to be most useful, particularly for things like
citations, bibliograp
Marc,
So far I've avoided commenting on your request for two main reasons: I
was obliged to retire last February so am no longer an "academic" as
such and also it was not clear what you were meaning.
Let me say that I never had problems with LibO (since the addition of
free-motion paths into Impr
i most sincerely hope not! It is not an email reader or a task
scheduler. For that, may I suggest you get Thunderbird from Mozilla
On 15/02/2012 08:58, Shawn Sumin wrote:
> Will LibreOffice ever have a similar program like MS Outlook?
>
> i.e. Calendar, Tasks, Contacts and Mail
>
--
Unsubscrib
Well, I worked with the W3C on doing the initial work on RDF but not
done anything for a while. If I can remember the login details I can
try to mention it.
On 03/10/2011 09:45, Jaime R. Garza wrote:
> It would be great if connected people could help to introduce this idea. I
> hope it doesn't sta
How about you just read the goddamn RFC's for email protocol and stop
whining about it?
On 01/10/2011 23:26, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Schofield [mailto:t...@weberpafrica.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 14:03
> To: discuss@documentfoundation.
We cannot compete with what has been done in
the past unless we deal with those legacy documents that will be kept
anyway.
On 30/07/2011 14:33, e-letter wrote:
> On 23/07/2011, Mark Preston wrote:
>> Look, lets be honest about this - Microsoft has by far the largest
>> proportio
Look, lets be honest about this - Microsoft has by far the largest
proportion of legacy documents out there and there is no way that
people can manage without access to those documents. Apart from
anything else, the law will require them to be kept and available if
needed for any future investigati
Just installed the 3.3.3 version from the website on a clean machine
and hit a problem. I already had ODT documents copied to the PC, the
install when perfectly fine. Snag was, the ODT documents were not
recognised and set to default to LibreOffice - and to make matters
worse, couldn't be assigned
Well, Jesse - where to begin?
Let's start with what MHTML is - it is "Mime-encoded Hypertext Mark-up
Language" or alternatively "Multipart...". What this refers to is that
the various parts that may be in a web page (images, Flash videos,
audio tracks etc.) are all saved as a single file, usually
Plino,
You seem a little confused, which is quite remarkable given the blog
you linked to is quite clear. First of all, font-embedding is not
supported because embedded fonts are one of the very many things ODF
and indeed XML in general is intended to get rid of. It was always a
bad idea, is a bad
Well, Charles, I also write fiction and publishers can be swine, I
admit - but I also write for journals and you should see editors! With
care, I do manage to use LibreOffice, and earlier OpenOffice,
throughout though I agree they don't all like it.
My attitude is that slowly we will get them to s
Will do - no problem. Give me a day or two to go through it.
On 21/05/2011 17:08, Gianluca Turconi wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> I really need some native English speaker in order to proofread a LibO
> tool draft proposal I made here:
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Website/LibreOfficeWiki/Propos
May I just take the time to agree 100% that this old stuff is, or
should be, dead and buried so we can move on. Remember, we are not
alone in forking from Oracle this way - for instance the Drizzle
database (by ex-MSQL developers) is now rated best non-proprietary
database option and this month Lib
Dear good gods alive no! :eave the HTML to proper HTML IDE tools like
Eclipse and don't try to be everything in one package.
On 26/04/2011 22:48, e-letter wrote:
>> I think this is a very interesting issue. We are moving from the dominant
>> technologies that were designed to put information on pa
There may be some truth to what you say, but I don't think Microsoft
bashing will advance LibO, which is what we want to do.
On 06/04/2011 20:50, aqualung wrote:
>
> Okay... while waiting for my two comments from earlier today to be approved
> by the mailing list, I thought I might comment on thi
Steve,
Indeed it is good to talk - that's why we're here. And I'm glad you
did because now I am much clearer on what you mean (and to some extent
sympathise).
Like your own users, I have written format filters that use Microsoft
Office Word documents and, probably like your own developers, put a
Steve,
While I understand your points, and Mike's, I can't say I agree with
them particularly.
On one issue we do agree and it is perhaps something to be looked at
by the development team. That is the automatic timed save of documents
while worked on. It is the case that should you lose a working
On 01/04/2011 10:37, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> @Mark: you write that you were able to see the source code of OpenOffice
> before Oracle bought Sun, but OpenOffice was Open Source anyway, so
> anybody could see the code. Did I get your point right?
>
You did get it right Charles - an
On 31/03/2011 05:48, aqualung wrote:
> Got a couple of questions.
>
> (1) I heard that OpenOffice is restricted from re-using code from
> LibreOffice because Oracle insists on broader licenses than LO developers
> are willing to give, but the reverse is not true. So, from this aspect LO
> can on
Yes, I'm aware you can do that. I was talking about the standard
keyboard - which I thought Tinkerer was too.
On 24/03/2011 23:00, Simon Cropper wrote:
> On 25/03/11 09:18, Mark Preston wrote:
>> How odd. Here in the UK - and most other places I've seen, +
>> (numeral) 4
How odd. Here in the UK - and most other places I've seen, +
(numeral) 4 produces the Euro symbol.
On 23/03/2011 18:55, Tinkerer wrote:
> On my keyboard Option+2 prints €.
>
> Tink
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Euro-symbol-not-inserted-into-wr
in our own documentation and on the site.
On 27/02/2011 19:29, Barbara Duprey wrote:
> On 2/26/2011 4:27 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
>> Thanks very much for this. I have the downloaded set-up files now and
>> will think hard on whether to install it or not - it has to depend on
>>
PM, Mark Preston wrote:
>> I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
>> but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
>> be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
>> using it near daily includ
Thanks very much Barbara. Glad to see someone has beaten me to it.
On 21/02/2011 23:08, Barbara Duprey wrote:
> On 2/21/2011 4:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
>> I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
>> but have really one simple question before I
I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
using it near daily including with MS Office documents and presentations.
So the question
Thanks for getting in touch, Joe, and I'll try to answer where I can.
On 16/02/2011 16:45, Joe Rotello wrote:
> Almost VITAL reading for LibreOffice developers, users, and supporters:
>
> [snip]
>
> The reasoning is that these weakness areas MUST be addressed and SOON,
> ...[snip]
>
> These inc
I regularly use Oo_O Portable in classes to avoid the obvious
potential file type clashes in different versions of the UK education
standard MS Office but have so far not been able to find a LibO
Portable version.
Could you give me a link to it if you have it handy?
On 12/02/2011 10:38, Harold Fu
Yeah, sorry about this NoOp - I should have mentioned we tried that
but got complete gibberish.
On 27/01/2011 23:27, NoOp wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 02:50 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
>> The other day we were sent a document but the sender had - presumably
>> by mistake - a template rathe
The other day we were sent a document but the sender had - presumably
by mistake - a template rather than document and in the DOTX format.
Searching the web, we found this is a horrible format with which an
awful lot of people have had problems with this format and even the
Microsoft Word Viewer wi
It is possible this problem may have been introduced by the addition
of free-motion paths I drove forward in the last major revision since
I don't recall seeing it before. On the other hand, I also don't
recall seeing them after the change either.
Does anyone know when it began to happen? Have any
On 02/01/2011 18:29, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 2011-01-02 12:07 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
>> Please remember that both LibO and OpenO can already *read* the
>> formats and the issue is whether or not it is practical or pragmatic
>> to put effort into developing something to *
I actually agree wholeheartedly with Italo here - please do not try
to hamstring the developers with your (or our) own preferences! The
idea of community discussion is to guide developers, not to instruct
them to do the impractical or impossible and equally not to instruct
them (for whatever reason
Craig,
Please remember that both LibO and OpenO can already *read* the
formats and the issue is whether or not it is practical or pragmatic
to put effort into developing something to *write* the OOXML form.
On 02/01/2011 00:50, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
> Barbara,
>
> First, ODF IS the ISO standard -
If I may inject what I hope is a little sense into this argument:-
A major strength of Open Office is and always was that it could read
and often write documents in many proprietary formats. That strength
should remain solidly a feature of Libre Office and for exactly the
same reasons.
When it co
I should have thought that, with the massive issues even Microsoft has
of meeting the alleged standard they have set, it was fairly obvious
why other software has not tried to meet it.
ODF works, is well-supported and even works in Microsoft Office so
with respect the answer is to use ODF and not
ults if the word was typed into the search engine but that
it will not be used for the search hints list or quick search features.
On 24/12/2010 15:47, Michael Wheatland wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:48 AM, Mark Preston
> wrote:
>> Is it likely that the - I suppose I should say &q
Is it likely that the - I suppose I should say "suggested" - changes
to Google search terms, specifically the removal of the word "torrent"
from the simple search terms, will affect Open Software availability?
Specifically the Libre Office obviously.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss
I see several issues in the discussion about installers - and I only
just joined the list! Let's list 'em...
1. You are assuming everyone will be running Linux. They won't.
2. You assume they all have a packaged Linux distro. They won't.
3. You presume they can all grab tar's themselves. They can'
38 matches
Mail list logo