All
The Call for Adoption people has ended and DNSOP has adopted the document.
Paul should upload a version
of the document with an updated name. He has already captured the issues
raised here:
https://github.com/paulehoffman/draft-hoffman-dnssec/issues
However, please raise any additional iss
> On Mar 25, 2022, at 12:07 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
> Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for adoption
> by DNSOP, and send any comments to the list, clearly stating your view.
I have read the draft, corrected one grammatical nit, and fully support its
adoption by DNSOP
129/>
Thanks.
--
Joey Deng
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 4:26 PM, dnsop-requ...@ietf.org wrote:
>
> [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: DNSSEC as BCP:
> draft-hoffman-dnssec
___
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> On Mar 24, 2022, at 4:07 PM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
>
> All
>
> If you attended the most recent DNSOP session, you've heard Warren speak
> about creating a BCP for DNSSEC, including all of the DNSSEC related RFCs,
> in order to make life easier for implementers and DNS operators.
>
> W
I support adoption of this draft.
I appreciate that it acknowledges that deployment has been lower than some
advocates hoped, but I think the text following that is misplaced:
However, this low level of implementation
does not affect whether DNSSEC is a best current practice; it just
ind
On Mar 25, 2022, at 00:08, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> If you attended the most recent DNSOP session, you've heard Warren speak
> about creating a BCP for DNSSEC, including all of the DNSSEC related RFCs,
> in order to make life easier for implementers and DNS operators.
Please do. As an author a
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 4:08 PM Tim Wicinski wrote:
>
> All
>
> If you attended the most recent DNSOP session, you've heard Warren speak
> about creating a BCP for DNSSEC, including all of the DNSSEC related RFCs,
> in order to make life easier for implementers and DNS operators.
>
> We want to
All
If you attended the most recent DNSOP session, you've heard Warren speak
about creating a BCP for DNSSEC, including all of the DNSSEC related RFCs,
in order to make life easier for implementers and DNS operators.
We want to ask the working group if this is something DNSOP wants to work
on. I
