Re: [E-devel] [e-users] New blog entry - Window manipulation and focus configuration nightmare

2007-12-31 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:28:23 +0900 schrieb Daniel Stonier: > On 31/12/2007, Daniel Stonier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Tyranny of the majority - I like that! Or like to fight against it > > anyway! > > > > I love E's philosophy in allowing the user to choose the style they > > want. Too often '

Re: [E-devel] New blog entry - Window manipulation and focus configuration nightmare

2007-12-31 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:46:12 + schrieb Ethan Grammatikidis: > I'm sorry to say that my first response to this was "Oh no, not > another blog to keep up with," or words to that effect. The content > of that post is clearly written and quite well thought out, but it > would be easier to discuss

Re: [E-devel] [e-users] New blog entry - Window manipulation and focus configuration nightmare

2007-12-31 Thread Daniel Stonier
Mate, dont worry about it, wasn't offended in the slightest. Just reiterating one of E17's strongest points. Didn't meant to cause any angst either. I actually think E's splitting of the configuration dialogs into basic/advanced is fine, most of what a normal joe would use is hidden from him anywa

Re: [E-devel] E CVS: apps/e devilhorns

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Torri
> On Dec 30, 2007 2:55 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> - if ((e_config->use_composite) && (ecore_x_composite_query())) >>> + if ((e_config->use_composite) && (ecore_x_screen_is_composited(0))) >> >> ecore_x_screen_is_composited does not check if the X server >> supports

Re: [E-devel] ecore_xcb proposal - part 2

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Nathan Ingersoll wrote: >> Another possibility (raster's idea) for >> ecore_x_drawable_geometry_get_async is to sent an event >> ECORE_X_REPLY_GEOMETRY_GET just when the xcb_get_geometry_reply call has >> returned. The event would contain (actually, would be) the structure >

Re: [E-devel] E CVS: apps/e devilhorns

2007-12-31 Thread Hisham Mardam Bey
On Dec 31, 2007 4:45 AM, Vincent Torri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is this stuff properly documented? We really should make it a > > requirement to not let any new code / changes into CVS without the > > proper documentation. > > after a discussion with devilhorns on irc, it seems that no compo

Re: [E-devel] E CVS: apps/e devilhorns

2007-12-31 Thread Vincent Torri
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote: > Thanks for the links, but that is really not my point here. My point > is that if someone walks in and tries to figure out what these > functions really do, there's no way of doing so (unless you consider > reading the source code then jumping over