On 2/06/2017 12:00 pm, smitra wrote:
On 02-06-2017 02:07, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote:
On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe.
For me the abandon of the colla
On 1/06/2017 10:52 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 13:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote:
>> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote:
>>> Thanks for these clarific
On 02-06-2017 02:07, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote:
On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe.
For me the abandon of the collapse is the solution of the EPR
"parad
On 1/06/2017 10:19 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I get your point wit
The January 4 2017 event gives more support to the idea Dark Matter
is
made of
primordial Black Holes born a nanosecond after the Big
Bang
and were never stars. The spin of one of the Black
H
oles is not in the same direction
as
the other
and
of
their orbit,
binary stars almo
On 2/06/2017 7:28 am, smitra wrote:
On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Non-locality is not removed in MWI as you appear to believe.
For me the abandon of the collapse is the solution of the EPR
"paradox", and Aspect experience is somehow the c
On January 4 2017 LIGO detected a third Black Hole merger and the most
distant one yet, 2.9 billion light years. A 31.2 solar mass Black Hole
collided with a 19.4 solar mass Black Hole resulting in a 48.7 solar mass
Black Hole with 2 solar masses converted into gravitational wave energy.
https:/
On 01-06-2017 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I get your point with decoherence.
Again, I would say that it all dep
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2017, at 12:44, Telmo Menezes wrote:
>
>> Creating a new thread to avoid causing decoherence on the other one :)
>>
What if the substitution level turns out to be at a higher level than
quantum? E.g. at the level of the
On 01 Jun 2017, at 16:42, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 M
On 1 June 2017 at 02:59, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 1/06/2017 6:28 am, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett <
> bhkell...@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
>
>> On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be
>> very
On 1 Jun 2017 15:20, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2
On 01 Jun 2017, at 15:59, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 M
On 1 Jun 2017 14:01, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 30
On 01 Jun 2017, at 12:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 M
On 01 Jun 2017, at 13:02, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote:
>> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote:
>>> Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your
explanations to be very
On 01 Jun 2017, at 03:59, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 6:28 am, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote:
Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to
be very lucid and helpful - they also confirm my ow
On 01 Jun 2017, at 02:26, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote:
I get your point with decoherence.
Again, I would say that it
On 31 May 2017, at 20:21, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 18:39, "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 17:00, David Nyman wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 14:48, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 14:10, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 1/06/2017 8:21 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote:
>> On 5/30/2017 7:30 PM, Pierz wrote:
>>> Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your
explanations to be very lucid and helpful - they also confirm m
On 1 Jun 2017 10:02 a.m., "Bruno Marchal" wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote:
>
> On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>> On 29 May 2017, at 13:42, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017, at 12:44, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Creating a new thread to avoid causing decoherence on the other one :)
What if the substitution level turns out to be at a higher level
than
quantum? E.g. at the level of the neurons and their connections and
activations levels?
That would e
On 31 May 2017, at 09:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote:
On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 3:28:18 PM UTC+10, Brent wrote:
Sorry. Something funny with my verizon account.
Brent
On 5/30/2017 8:09 PM, Pierz Newton-John wrote:
> Brent, are you replying from a mobile? I’m
On 31 May 2017, at 19:14, David Nyman wrote:
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote:
On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2017, at 13:42, David Nyman wrote:
On 29 May 2017 at 05:27, Brent Meeker wrote:
Yes, so t
24 matches
Mail list logo
