Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

r the end." -Woody Allen > > > - Receiving the following content - > From: Craig Weinberg > Receiver: everything-list > Time: 2012-09-19, 17:11:45 > Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy. > > > > > On Tuesday, S

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

ppened with his resurrection. Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 9/20/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." -Woody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: Craig Weinberg Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-19, 17:11:45 Subject: Re: Re: Re:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

On Tuesday, September 18, 2012 5:27:13 AM UTC-4, rclough wrote: > > Hi Richard Ruquist > > Obeying the commandments will not get you into heaven, > only believing in Christ's sacrifice for us will do that. > > What kind of a sacrifice

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

On Wed, Sep 19, Roger Clough wrote: > OK, genius. So, following impeccable logic, you believe you are John > Clark because from infancy people kept ramming down your thoat that you are > John Clark. > Yes. People told me that my name was "John Clark" and like all young children I believed them,

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

oody Allen - Receiving the following content - From: John Clark Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-18, 12:55:58 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy. On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Obeying the commandments will not ge

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 Roger Clough wrote: > there is no indisputable reason to believe in God. > Yes. > > Faith or trust is required In other words stupidity is required. > and that's exactly what God wants > God wants? GOD WANTS??!! The guy's omnipotent, God doesn't want, God has. John

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Obeying the commandments will not get you into heaven, only believing in > Christ's sacrifice for us will do that. > And you know that because you were told it over and over again from the very moment you learned language, and everything tha

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

g the following content - From: John Clark Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-17, 13:40:03 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Roger Clough wrote: >God loved the believers and hated the nonbelievers, at least t

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

ity that I can think of. Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 9/18/2012 "Forever is a long time, especially near the end." Woody Allan - Receiving the following content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-17, 11:02:01 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

llowing content - From: Richard Ruquist Receiver: everything-list Time: 2012-09-17, 13:53:40 Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy. Jesus said that he likes people to be hot or cold, atheists and theists that keep all the commandments, even ones he added like p

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

Jesus said that he likes people to be hot or cold, atheists and theists that keep all the commandments, even ones he added like praying in a closet. The other people are the least in heaven, which BTW implies that we all make to heaven. He especially dislikes those who change or reinterprete his w

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Roger Clough wrote: >God loved the believers and hated the nonbelievers, at least that's what > the Bible tells us. > Yes that's what the Bible says, it says that a omnipotent omniscient being is pretending that He does not exist and He hates anyone that He has b

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

l save you. > The Gospel is the fulfillment of the laws. > > You only need to accept that fact for it to be > saved. > > > > o invent him > so that everything could function." > - Receiving the following content - > From: Richard Ruquist > Receiver: every

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy. I was waiting for your reply. Alas, Jesus was a Jew and Jews have 613 commandments, not just 10. Insults do not help your argument. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Richard Ruquist > > Another drive-by

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

Hi John Clark God loved the believers and hated the nonbelievers, at least that's what the Bible tells us. So who would he slay ? Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 9/17/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so that everything could function." - Receivi

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

I was waiting for your reply. Alas, Jesus was a Jew and Jews have 613 commandments, not just 10. Insults do not help your argument. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Roger Clough wrote: > Hi Richard Ruquist > > Another drive-by shooting. Just an unsupported denial > and you speed off. How can you

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: the "nothing but" fallacy.

Hi Richard Ruquist Another drive-by shooting. Just an unsupported denial and you speed off. How can you be taken seriously ? Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net 9/17/2012 Leibniz would say, "If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so that everything could function." - Receiving the follo