lously in size anyway.
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jonathan Link [mailto:jonathan.l...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, September 09, 2011 11:04 AM
>
> *To:* MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> *Subject:* Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
>
> ** **
>
> Yes. Genera
1:04 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
Yes. Generally we're the recipient, though. In the case of sending, I've been
told that the limit on sending (on our end is too onerous) so I just opened
that up, too. 9 times out of ten they
r end can fix the recipients limit.
>
> Mike
>
> - Message from jonathan.l...@gmail.com -
> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 11:38:12 -0400
> From: Jonathan Link
> Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues <
> exchangelist@lyris.sunbelt-software.com>
> Subject: Re
1 11:38:12 -0400
From: Jonathan Link
Reply-To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Coming to this late, I'd bump the send limit to probably 20 MB.
> I'd remove the receive limit entirely.
Coming to this late, I'd bump the send limit to probably 20 MB.
I'd remove the receive limit entirely. But this is based on our industry.
People send us huge documents all the time. We avoid having limits to deal
with them.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:21 AM, John Hornbuckle <
john.hornbuc...@taylo
Thanks for the feedback, everyone. I think I may bump the limit up a bit, and
also look into Accellion since several of you mentioned it.
John
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:35 AM
> To: MS-
10 meg message size limit (as opposed to attachment size) and a secure transfer
system.
-Original Message-
From: Maglinger, Paul [mailto:pmaglin...@scvl.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:20 AM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
20MB attachment limits. We may have to bow under pressure and
reconsider when we complete the migration to 2010.
We strongly encourage sftp though.
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 11:35 AM
To: MS-Exch
Original Message-
> > From: Young, Darren [mailto:darren.yo...@chicagobooth.edu]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:40 PM
> > To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> > Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
> >
> > We have a 20MB attachment limit
We use 20mb with an Accellion for anything over that.
Whatever you set it to at some point it won't be enough so there is no right
answer.
From: John Hornbuckle [john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: 08 September 2011 5:34 PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issue
PM
To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
How are you implementing the AD policy that automatically sends through it?
> -Original Message-
> From: Garcia-Moran, Carlos [mailto:cgarciamo...@spragueenergy.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September
September 08, 2011 12:40 PM
> To: MS-Exchange Admin Issues
> Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
>
> We have a 20MB attachment limit and an Accellion FTA to securely transfer
> files larger than that. Biggest problem: MIME overhead. People say "you said
> it
Subject: RE: Best Practices for Attachment Size Limits
We have a 20MB attachment limit and an Accellion FTA to securely transfer files
larger than that. Biggest problem: MIME overhead. People say "you said it's
20MB but it won't go through". So, we have to explain that depending
We have a 20MB attachment limit and an Accellion FTA to securely transfer files
larger than that. Biggest problem: MIME overhead. People say "you said it's
20MB but it won't go through". So, we have to explain that depending on the
type of file even an 18MB Excel might surpass 20MB with MIME ove
14 matches
Mail list logo