Civileme wrote:
>
> I haven't seen much to impress in Caldera as far as smoothing
> rough edges. I install a LOT of linux systems, and Caldera is
> smooth only to the point of where you have hardware it isn't
> preprogrammed for. Then the tools are inadequate, the
> documentation doesn't match
Brianwhen I tried out Caldera there were sure enough rough
edges for me. Also, the real official Linux Mandrake Power Pack
has 6 cd's and a whole bunch of stuff in rpm format that you
can't find anywhere else (like star office & wordperfect).
Maybe you shouldn't write off Mandrake so easily
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 22:09 -0500, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
>
> I suppose that I have an expectation that I shouldn't have to go to the
> net to get documentation on new features in the distribution.
It depends. If you "buy" the free version (i.e. d'l the ISO of
the main CD from the net)
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
>
> I suppose that I have an expectation that I shouldn't have to go to the
> net to get documentation on new features in the distribution.
>
I think that I had that expectation at one time. It has been
corrected. That is THE place to look for info, whether it
Not sure what your problems were but many of the common issues people have can
be solved by openning a terminal and typing man (subject of the moment)
Jim
Pilrose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
Just another crazy guy,
Champion of the Underdogs of this world
***
"Brian T. Schellenberger" wrote:
>
> I suppose that I have an expectation that I shouldn't have to go to the
> net to get documentation on new features in the distribution.
>
> In my case it would seem that I got a bad copy of Mandrake 'cause I
> only seem to have two disks though the package lo
I suppose that I have an expectation that I shouldn't have to go to the
net to get documentation on new features in the distribution.
In my case it would seem that I got a bad copy of Mandrake 'cause I
only seem to have two disks though the package looks like it's meant to
hold three of 'em. (I
Camillethanks, glad to know that you're there and thanks for
the file, but on my system this file is already installed in the
man pages.
What we were talking about was the only available docs for
supermount were the man page and the --help switch and that
there were no additional docs or ho
Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> Vincentthanks. What was supposed to be on there were some
> docs for supermount. Are they brief enough to post here for
> those of us who haven't any access to them?
Here you are, sorry for the inconvenience.
For documentation woes, please use the adress: [EMAIL
Vincentthanks. What was supposed to be on there were some
docs for supermount. Are they brief enough to post here for
those of us who haven't any access to them?
Alan
Vincent Danen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
>
> > Axalonthere's a significant thread here tha
On Wed, 8 Mar 2000, Alan Shoemaker wrote:
> Axalonthere's a significant thread here that I guess you
> missed, try the archives. A group of us has been discussing
> supermount problems for over a week now and you've not been
> contributing at all (nor has anyone else from MandrakeSoft).
> B
Well, I don't save all my old e-mails, but I posted to the cooker list
on Sun 27 Feb with "Suggestions/Problems (& praise) w/rt Mandrake 7.0"
and a brief reprise on Thu 2 Mar wondering if anybody had read it.
I've mentioned the problem with me not being able to find the how-tos
in at least least
Axalonthere's a significant thread here that I guess you
missed, try the archives. A group of us has been discussing
supermount problems for over a week now and you've not been
contributing at all (nor has anyone else from MandrakeSoft).
Brian is rightfully upset when you accuse him directly
- Original Message -
From: Rich Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: lack of documentation (was Re: [expert] Removing supermount)
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
>
> > On
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2000, Axalon wrote:
> | On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, alann wrote:
> |
> | > Just curious, does supermount NOT work?? Why are so many people wanting to
>remove it?
> |
> | No supermount does work.
> |
> | It like everything else has b
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Brian T. Schellenberger wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2000, Axalon wrote:
> | On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, alann wrote:
> |
> | > Just curious, does supermount NOT work?? Why are so many people wanting to
>remove it?
> |
> | No supermount does work.
> |
> | It like everything else has b
On Tue, 07 Mar 2000, Axalon wrote:
| On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, alann wrote:
|
| > Just curious, does supermount NOT work?? Why are so many people wanting to remove
|it?
|
| No supermount does work.
|
| It like everything else has basic do's and dont's that some people don't
| care to learn,
I'm so
17 matches
Mail list logo