Hmm, what a stir about simple question..
If I only knew... I wouldn't stat this thread. Any way to close it or
delete it? Seems like pretty painful topic.
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Am 04.02.2016 um 22:11 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
and I'm the rude when your are insulting
what do you expect for ignorace and waste time by continue pretending
proven wrong *b...t* instead learn to deal with your mail client?
2016-02-04 22:06 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
On 4 Feb 2016 9:56
and I'm the rude when your are insulting
2016-02-04 22:06 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
> On 4 Feb 2016 9:56 p.m., "juan carlos Rebate" wrote:
>>
>> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
>
> Click the fking three little dots!
> ___
> ffmp
On 4 Feb 2016 9:56 p.m., "juan carlos Rebate" wrote:
>
> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
Click the fking three little dots!
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:56 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
and NO you should not reply at the bottom
* repy INLINE
* quote correctly
* strip un-needed quotes
* learn to use email
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:56 PM, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom,
Mine does. Click the little rectangle with three dots on it. Then you
can reply "inline", like I am doing right now.
-m
___
ffmpeg-us
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:56 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom
READ THIS WHOLE FUCKING THREAD AND STOP PRETEND THAT!
you are even too lazy/stupid to remove the list footer from your reply
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:37 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
I am
gmail.com does not include options to write at the bottom, outlook if
you have this option, but this application is payment, evolution does
not have that option, thunderbird does not have this option, if you
have kmail but does not allow referencing the ancient text
2016-02-04 21:40 GMT+01:00 Rein
Am 04.02.2016 um 21:37 schrieb juan carlos Rebate:
I am not rude, gmail-web does not allow me to publish on the bottom
and not use programs that do not like, no one can force me to use
something I'm not comfortable
proven in *this thread* you can properly write mail with gmail and if
you are
I am not rude, gmail-web does not allow me to publish on the bottom
and not use programs that do not like, no one can force me to use
something I'm not comfortable
2016-02-04 20:55 GMT+01:00 Paul B Mahol :
> On 2/4/16, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
>> if you think it's a waste of time does not respon
On 2/4/16, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> if you think it's a waste of time does not respond, the sociedd
> progresses, the services must engage the advance, the service is so
> and we must tolerate, no one should tell anyone how they should do
> things.
You are being rude, because you are top posti
if you think it's a waste of time does not respond, the sociedd
progresses, the services must engage the advance, the service is so
and we must tolerate, no one should tell anyone how they should do
things.
2016-02-04 19:31 GMT+01:00 Jannes Faber :
> On 4 February 2016 at 17:42, juan carlos Rebate
On 4 February 2016 at 17:42, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
> I agree
To what? Why are you trying to waste my time? Why are you trying to force
me to search through the context, by top posting?
I'm not going to. So I don't care what you're agreeing to. Which is not my
problem.
Also, I'm muting thi
I agree, I'm used to answer as well, plus it's easier to read
responses, this innconveniente ignore me on the list, besides the html
is the evolution, why so afraid?
2016-02-04 11:27 GMT+01:00 Nicolas George :
> Le sextidi 16 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Roman a écrit :
>> I've seen many times people aski
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:46 AM, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are use
Phil Turmel, Jason C
Hi guys and thanks for your time, but it now seems like we see
disadvantages of quoted answers or laziness of yours to read the whole 28
mails and see the fact, that I was not tried to say something really bad to
this type of style. Thanks to Reindl Harald's patience which was
Honestly it is a non-issue.
I thought I was signing up for a technical discussion and support list, not a
posting etiquette discussion list. Apparently ffmpeg has no such thing.
On February 4, 2016 10:50:43 AM EST, Jason C wrote:
>On Feb 4, 2016 4:46 AM, "Roman" wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I'v
mail below?
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Betreff: Re: [FFmpeg-user] top posting issue
Datum: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 08:40:02 -0500
Von: Charles Winthrop
Antwort an: FFmpeg user questions
An: FFmpeg user questions
Well, this has decided me. Dump ffmpeg and find an actual solution.
Everyone her would rather w
On Feb 4, 2016 4:46 AM, "Roman" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are used to r
Hi Roman,
On 02/04/2016 04:46 AM, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ?
Long-time lurker here, infrequent poster, so take this as an outsider's
view:
People who *ask* questions on mailing lists l
Am 04.02.2016 um 15:06 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
top-posting is considered rude on this list
By who?
why do you strip quotes out of context and play the unknown while you
are long enough trolling on this list:
https://www.google.com/search?q=top-posting+here+is+considered+as+rude
signature.
> top-posting is considered rude on this list
By who?
And at this point, the idea of your accusing anyone else of impoliteness is
hilarious.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it.
Please stop insulting me. I haven't insulted you. Your presumptiveness is
breathtaking
when you recommend ignoring the list-rules your are either a fool or a troll
"background no
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Charles Winthrop:
Well, this has decided me. Dump ffmpeg and find an actual solution.
have fun, here ffmpeg works for nearly a decade fine
Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve
a problem. Really professsional, folks!
WTF - c
I work with open source software daily. And I have NEVER seen more
in-fighting going on with a single piece of it until ffmpeg. Not just
this list. I've tried forums, live chats, and even stackexchange. Nobody
dealing with ffmpeg, these so-called "experts" ever answer any
questions, they just b
> Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve > a
>problem. Really professsional, folks!
Welcome to open source software...
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
> no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it.
Please stop insulting me. I haven't insulted you. Your presumptiveness is
breathtaking.
> "background noise" comes from the list-owners / developers
That's funny, when I've asked in the past, I have been told that nobody is in
char
Well, this has decided me. Dump ffmpeg and find an actual solution.
Everyone her would rather whine about writing style than actually solve
a problem. Really professsional, folks!
On 2/4/2016 8:09 AM, Phil Rhodes wrote:
I think the fact that this is by far the most hotly-debated topic in a lo
Am 04.02.2016 um 14:35 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
who do you think you are?
I think I'm the guy who isn't using bad language
no, you are a fool telling others "Ignore complaints about it. They're
background noise" while that so called "background noise" comes from the
list-owners / developers
> who do you think you are?
I think I'm the guy who isn't using bad language.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
I think the fact that this is by far the most hotly-debated topic in a long
time speaks volumes.
P
___
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
2016-02-04 14:49 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 04.02.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Roman:
>
>> that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
>>> nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
>>>
>>> I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I
Am 04.02.2016 um 13:45 schrieb Roman:
that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I'm not a PC
beginner, I've got really about 12 years of techn
> that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
> nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
>
> I understand your frustration, but please, try to stay calm. I'm not a PC
beginner, I've got really about 12 years of technical experience in *nix
and networki
that below is the perfect example how shitty your mailing style is
nobody is any longer able to guess who said what in what context
Am 04.02.2016 um 13:24 schrieb Roman:
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
Clicking on the ellipsis in the box (those three dots in a gr
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and
may encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complaining about it is on lists just like this one, dedi
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
Clicking on the ellipsis in the box (those three dots in a grey
rectangle) with the tooltip "Show trimmed content" you will suddenly see
everything you are quoting. You can then cut it up from there.
Here is what is happened, when
Am 04.02.2016 um 12:48 schrieb Phil Rhodes:
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and may
encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complai
On 2016-02-04 12:44, Roman wrote:
>> OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
>
> So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or just
> copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
No. I expect you to use the "features" of the "client" you use.
In
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:44 AM, Roman wrote:
>
> > OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
>
> So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or
just
> copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
This was also done from gmail's website. Click on the
Most of the time, it doesn't cause serious problems with readability and may
encourage people to contribute usefully if they're posting on, say, a
cellphone, or in a hurry.
It's an "open source thing". The only place you commonly find people
complaining about it is on lists just like this one,
> OMFG! Let me log into the web interface and show you how it is done.
So you just offer me to insert ">" symbol before every line I quote or just
copy the whole e-mail I'm answering to?
2016-02-04 13:40 GMT+02:00 James Darnley :
> On 2016-02-04 12:30, Roman wrote:
> > why should *we* suck
On 2016-02-04 12:30, Roman wrote:
> why should *we* suck your quoting style?
>
> you should not. just don't reply, if you don't like the style. To try
> to convince every one to change their habits due to minority being upset. I
> think, such approach will make everyone happy.
>
> why should some
why should *we* suck your quoting style?
you should not. just don't reply, if you don't like the style. To try
to convince every one to change their habits due to minority being upset. I
think, such approach will make everyone happy.
why should someone use gmail-webinterface when gmail also works
Am 04.02.2016 um 12:12 schrieb Roman:
Damn, you guys just made my eyes bleeding again
then look somewhere else?
I use gmail, so when I copy the visualized quote, It ends up with:
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
Seems like doesn't. Or it actuall
Damn, you guys just made my eyes bleeding again.
I use gmail, so when I copy the visualized quote, It ends up with:
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
Seems like doesn't. Or it actually does, when I will send it? Let's see..
Why should I keep to some cl
Am 04.02.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Roman:
When you read reviews (academical, amateur, professional), there are no
quotes and below-postings. Review author just mentions what exactly hes
referring to and continues his review. And same goes to review on review.
Please see academical reviews as an exa
Am 04.02.2016 um 11:59 schrieb Roman:
Thanks for an answer.
I see, but still not share such approach while sending/receiving e-mails.
It was not very comfortable for me to follow your e-mail with such quotes
does your mail client not visualize quotes?
get a better one - see attachment
s
Am 04.02.2016 um 10:46 schrieb Roman:
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
yes
So here I've got a question.. Why ?
because it's better readable
Most of programs, including gmail app
and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way a
Hi,
Thanks for an answer.
I see, but still not share such approach while sending/receiving e-mails.
It was not very comfortable for me to follow your e-mail with such quotes
etc. I'd prefer to read it just as one whole e-mail separated with empty
new lines for every of my question with reference
On 2016-02-04 10:46, Roman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
> and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
> people are used to read ma
Roman wrote:
Hi,
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the
list... So here I've got a question.. Why ?
It's a mailing list, not just a conversation between two people.
When you ask multiple questions different people may answer different
parts, which may spawn sub thr
Le sextidi 16 pluviôse, an CCXXIV, Roman a écrit :
> I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
> So here I've got a question.. Why ?
I will answer to you with a question: when you watch an episode of a TV
series, does it:
A. start with short excerpts of the previou
Hi,
I've seen many times people asking/forcing not to top-post to the list...
So here I've got a question.. Why ? Most of programs, including gmail app
and gmail web come with top posting by default and this is the way all
people are used to read mail. Why the hell one should scroll down to see
t
54 matches
Mail list logo