Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Also, you will likely need to add an IRQ to the pcic line in your > kernel config. The pcic driver should be smart enough to find a free IRQ; in addition pccardd shouldn't have to specify a list of IRQs to use; thats info the kernel knows about. I'm ki

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : The pcic driver should be smart enough to find a free IRQ; in addition : pccardd shouldn't have to specify a list of IRQs to use; thats info the : kernel knows about. Should be smart enough? How? There are a limited number of IRQs avai

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : pccardd shouldn't have to specify a list of IRQs to use; thats info the : kernel knows about. Oops. Missed this part. The problem again is that the kernel doesn't know about this. At least it knows it only to a point. It knows which

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Oops. Missed this part. The problem again is that the kernel doesn't > know about this. At least it knows it only to a point. It knows > which IRQs are in use, but it doesn't know if the pcic (or cardbus > bridge in compat mode) can route to a given fr

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > Well, yes. The IRQs are supposed to be free AND ROUTABLE TO THE PCIC > part. If they are, then it works great. If they aren't, then we lose > bigtime. It seems to me that any IRQ that the PCIC can see will be usable for assignment to a card no? Is the

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : Otherwise your timeout solution seems good. Are the valid IRQs dependent : on the board integrator or on the chip used? Since we can identify the : chips (well, it looks like we can) couldn't we maintain a 'quirk' table? That I'm not s

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Warner Losh wrote: > I'd love to find a good solution to this problem. I'm glad your flame > caught me at a time when my brain was up for trying to solve this > silly problem. Well, I wasn't really trying to flame you, or anyone. It is frusterating to see how much time gets

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : Well, I wasn't really trying to flame you, or anyone. It is frusterating : to see how much time gets tied up in tracking down dodgy PCIC configs : though. Solving that would probably free you up of several emails a : week. If I start m

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : Ok, I'm obviously missing something here... You mean the IRQs specified : in /etc/pccard.conf are a complete crapshoot? Well, yes. The IRQs are supposed to be free AND ROUTABLE TO THE PCIC part. If they are, then it works great. If

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Wes Peters
"Matthew N. Dodd" wrote: > > Matching drivers to hardware is > something a newbus driver should do itself; relying on an external hint > mechanism strikes me as a solution prone to user aggravation. (speaking > as an aggravated user of course.) Do you really want to cram a list of all known PCc

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: : Do you really want to cram a list of all known PCcard and USB devices : into your kernel? Ugh. Do you really want to cram a list of all known pci cards into the kernel? Same thing really. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Edwin Culp writes: : Thanks, I would not have found it for a while. I checked UPDATING and saw nothing, : although my problem may have been because I haven't been able to finish a world : since the commit. That's an oversight on my part. Which I'm correcting right

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Edwin Culp
Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Edwin Culp writes: > : Thanks, I would not have found it for a while. I checked UPDATING and saw nothing, > : although my problem may have been because I haven't been able to finish a world > : since the commit. > > That's an oversight on my pa

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Wes Peters
Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: > : Do you really want to cram a list of all known PCcard and USB devices > : into your kernel? Ugh. > > Do you really want to cram a list of all known pci cards into the > kernel? Same thing really. Mmm... Good point.

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Wes Peters wrote: > Mmm... Good point. This means updating code and compiling a new > kernel every time Joe's hardware company sticks their own name on a > generic OEM PCI or PCCard, doesn't it? I love this industry. Too many drivers require knowledge of specific cards in

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. Dodd" writes: : Too many drivers require knowledge of specific cards in order to properly : handle 'quirks'. This isn't going to change. While a recompile is : annoying we can be assured that a driver maintainer will only add IDs to a : driver after th

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 19-Jan-00 Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: > : Do you really want to cram a list of all known PCcard and USB > : devices > : into your kernel? Ugh. > Do you really want to cram a list of all known pci cards into the > kernel? Same thing really. So a

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Mike Smith
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Matthew N. >Dodd" writes: > : pccardd shouldn't have to specify a list of IRQs to use; thats info the > : kernel knows about. > > Oops. Missed this part. The problem again is that the kernel doesn't > know about this. At least it knows it only to a point. I

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes: : It can make a pretty good guess though; certainly good enough in most : cases. The problem with guesses is that they are guesses and often wrong. Consider a simple case. If I don't have a sound driver configured on my laptop, IRQ 5 could appe

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-19 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 03:50:49PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > Mmm... Good point. This means updating code and compiling a new kernel > every time Joe's hardware company sticks their own name on a generic OEM > PCI or PCCard, doesn't it? I love this industry. Do the above and try and figure ou

Re: Problems with PCMCIA Cards

2000-01-20 Thread Wes Peters
Bill Fumerola wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 03:50:49PM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Mmm... Good point. This means updating code and compiling a new kernel > > every time Joe's hardware company sticks their own name on a generic OEM > > PCI or PCCard, doesn't it? I love this industry. >

Re: Problems with Linux emulation

1999-09-30 Thread Steve Kargl
Thomas Schuerger wrote: [Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > > This happens when the install script wants to call {PREFIX}/sbin/ldconfig > (the Linux-ldconfig). > > I rebuilt and reinstalled the linux emulation module, but that > didn_t help either. > Installing the above po

Re: Problems in /usr/src

2013-01-04 Thread Adrian Chadd
... ath_ahb is only needed for MIPS platforms. Why are you building it for x86? Also, do you have the 5416 support option in your kernel? adrian On 4 January 2013 20:37, Super Bisquit wrote: > In sys/modules/svr4 needs machine/_align.h to read > X86/include/_align.h, if that means anything. >

Re: Problems in /usr/src

2013-01-04 Thread Super Bisquit
I did not know that ath_ahb was MIPS only. Why? I wanted the most/best performance for my system's wireless. Support for 5416 is there but the card is a 2413. On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > ... ath_ahb is only needed for MIPS platforms. Why are you building it for > x86?

Re: problems compiling latest RELENG_8

2010-12-29 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/29/10 14:50, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > System i386 > > CVSTag: > > # $FreeBSD: src/COPYRIGHT,v 1.11.2.2 2009/12/31 10:00:49 obrien Exp $ > # @(#)COPYRIGHT 8.2 (Berkeley) 3/21/94 > > flosoft# make -j4 DESTDIR=/ world kernel Remove -j i

Re: problems compiling latest RELENG_8

2010-12-29 Thread Aryeh Friedman
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 12/29/10 14:50, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> System i386 >> >> CVSTag: >> >> # $FreeBSD: src/COPYRIGHT,v 1.11.2.2 2009/12/31 10:00:49 obrien Exp $ >> #       @(#)COPYRIGHT   8.2 (Berkeley) 3/21/94

Re: problems compiling latest RELENG_8

2010-12-29 Thread Xin LI
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/29/10 16:02, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Xin LI wrote: > On 12/29/10 14:50, Aryeh Friedman wrote: System i386 CVSTag: # $FreeBSD: src/COPYRIGHT,v 1.11.2.2 2009/12/31 10:00:49 obrien Exp $ >

Re: problems compiling latest RELENG_8

2010-12-29 Thread Aryeh Friedman
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Xin LI wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 12/29/10 16:02, Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Xin LI wrote: >> On 12/29/10 14:50, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > System i386 > > CVSTag: > > # $FreeBS

Re: problems compiling latest RELENG_8

2010-12-29 Thread Garrett Cooper
Hopefully I'm not stating the obvious, but have you tried doing toolchain first? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 29, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Xin LI wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> On 12/29/10 16:02, Aryeh Friedma

Re: Problems with ELF Emacs

1999-03-24 Thread Russell L. Carter
%I'm running -current from a couple of weeks ago. I recently re-compiled %XFree86 to ELF - which works, and re-compiled emacs-19.34b - which won't %work with X11, though it does work inside an Xterm. My old aout emacs %still works (with old aout libraries - the re-compiled aout libraries %seem to

Re: Problems with ELF Emacs

1999-03-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Jeremy writes: > I'm running -current from a couple of weeks ago. I recently re-compiled > XFree86 to ELF - which works, and re-compiled emacs-19.34b - which won't > work with X11, though it does work inside an Xterm. My old aout emacs > still works (with old aout libraries - the re-compil

Re: Problems with ELF Emacs

1999-03-26 Thread Peter Jeremy
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >Peter Jeremy writes: >> I'm running -current from a couple of weeks ago. I recently re-compiled >> XFree86 to ELF - which works, and re-compiled emacs-19.34b - which won't >> work with X11, though it does work inside an Xterm. > >I run an Elf build of Emacs 19.34b dai

Re: Problems with -current gdb

1999-05-06 Thread Scott Michel
> % gdb foobar foobar.core > Register %s not found in core file. ^^ Should read: "Register eax not found in core file." Silly me... :-) -scooter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Problems with -current gdb

1999-05-07 Thread Doug Rabson
On Thu, 6 May 1999, Scott Michel wrote: > > % gdb foobar foobar.core > > Register %s not found in core file. >^^ > Should read: > > "Register eax not found in core file." > > Silly me... :-) I'll look at it today - My head is in gdb mode at the moment after doing the import. -- Dou

Re: Problems getting 3C597 up

1999-06-04 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Fri, 4 Jun 1999, Bret Ford wrote: > vx0: <3Com 3C597-TX Network Adapter> at slot 5 on eisa0 > vx0: No I/O space?! > device_probe_and_attach: vx0 attach returned -1 This was fixed in version 1.45 of sys/i386/eisaconf.c -- | Matthew N. Dodd | 78 280Z | 75 164E | 84 245DL | FreeBSD/NetBSD/Sprit

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

2021-05-01 Thread Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen
On 01.05.2021 21.09, Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: Hi all I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show only this message: May 1 14:24:18 valfenda kernel: re0: watchdog timeout May 1 14:24:1

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

2021-05-01 Thread Greg Rivers via freebsd-current
On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog > timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show > only this message: > Switch to the official Realtek driver in ports: net/rea

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

2021-05-01 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The watchdog >> timer send a timeout message and I loose connection temporaly. In logs show >> only this

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

2021-05-01 Thread Greg Rivers via freebsd-current
On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: > > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: > >> I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC. The > >> watchdog timer send a timeout mess

Re: Problems with realtek NIC

2021-05-02 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 02.05.21 um 01:37 schrieb Greg Rivers: > On Saturday, 1 May 2021 16:45:03 CDT Stefan Esser wrote: >> Am 01.05.21 um 21:48 schrieb Greg Rivers via freebsd-current: >>> On Saturday, 1 May 2021 14:09:46 CDT Nilton Jose Rizzo wrote: I using a FreeBSD 14-Current and get random error with my NIC.

Re: Problems with 4.0-current

1999-01-24 Thread Donald J . Maddox
On Sun, Jan 24, 1999 at 01:47:25PM -0600, Stingray wrote: > I just CVSup'd 4.0-current and installed it, then made an elf kernel. > The elf kernel seemed to boot up just fine, but when the file systems > where being mounted, it couldn't mount /: > > Specified device does not match mounted de

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-15 Thread Luoqi Chen
> Hi. > > I saw that my 4-CURRENT box from 8 February dropped to ddb > after my last make world. I rebuilt world today, and the > same problem is occuring. These problems started occuring > after Matt Dillon's changes to the VM system. > > What is worrying/troubling is that in single user mode, >

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-15 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 15 February 1999 at 18:00:16 -0500, Luoqi Chen wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I saw that my 4-CURRENT box from 8 February dropped to ddb >> after my last make world. I rebuilt world today, and the >> same problem is occuring. These problems started occuring >> after Matt Dillon's changes to the VM

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread Matthew Dillon
:maxusers 256 Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic distribution -- and everything started working again. It turned out that a maxusers value of 256 and 512 were causing his mac

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread Brian Feldman
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :maxusers 256 > > Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior > to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic > distribution -- and everything started working again. > > It turned out t

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread Khetan Gajjar
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: MD> Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior MD> to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic MD> distribution -- and everything started working again. Hmmm, ok. MD> It turned out tha

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread John Fieber
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior > to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic > distribution -- and everything started working again. > > It turned out that a maxusers value of

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread John S. Dyson
Matthew Dillon said: > :maxusers 256 > > Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior > to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic > distribution -- and everything started working again. > > It turned out that a maxusers value of

RE: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-16 Thread tcobb
: Tuesday, February 16, 1999 7:48 AM > To: Matthew Dillon > Cc: Khetan Gajjar; curr...@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Problems in VM structure ? > > > On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > :maxusers 256 > > > > Try reduc

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-17 Thread Gary Palmer
[ CC trimmed ] tc...@staff.circle.net wrote in message ID : > I've had it at MAXUSERS=256 on both the P5 and the P6. The P5 stays > stable, the P6 doesn't. If I reduce MAXUSERS to 128 then these > heavily loaded boxen will fall over due to out of MBUFs errors, or > so I believe. If you are runn

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Feb 16, 1999 at 12:19:07AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :maxusers 256 > > Try reducing maxusers to 128. Another person reported similar behavior > to me and after a bunch of work he tried going back to a basic > distribution -- and everything started working again. > T

Re: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-17 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Feb 17, 1999 at 08:46:49AM -0500, tc...@staff.circle.net wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Matthew Dillon [mailto:dil...@apollo.backplane.com] > > :What's the chance that our kernel adaptations for PIIs > > :is partly at fault? > > : > > :-Troy Cobb > > : C

RE: Problems in VM structure ?

1999-02-18 Thread tcobb
I've adjusted MAXUSERS to 128 on my heavily loaded PIIs and the crashes have not re-occurred for 24 hours now. (Had to adjust NMBCLUSTERS up, though) The panics were happening every 5-8 hours like clockwork prior to this. I believe that these crashes are caused by heavy network traffic, not heavy

Re: Problems with XFree86-4

2003-10-14 Thread Eric Anholt
On Tue, 2003-10-14 at 17:21, Rossam Souza Silva wrote: > Hi, I'm running 5.1-CURRENT (sources/ports from Oct/13) and > the X package isn't compiling: > > FeaNoR# make package > ===> Installing for XFree86-4.3.0,1 > ===> XFree86-4.3.0,1 depends on executable: xvinfo - not found > ===>Verifyi

Re: Problems building today's world

2003-06-02 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Monday, 2 June 2003 at 10:54:06 +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I've just cvsupped the latest -CURRENT, and it dies on me in > gnu/usr.bin/gperf/doc: *sigh* Yes, of course I saw the dialogue between DES and obrien, and the subsequent commit, so I re-supped and cvs updated and it still hap

Re: problems with wi driver.

2003-08-14 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 01:44:15PM +0200, Robert Blacquière wrote: > Hi, > > I have some problems getting wi cards working. I've traced the behavour > of it. > > It assigns the first io memory 0x100-0x13f and the card fails to work. > I plugin a second wi card and it gets 0x180-0x1bf and the ca

Re: problems with wi driver.

2003-08-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
: Is there a better way to toggle the start address for 16 bit and 32 bit : cards with sysctl?? u_long cbb_start_16_io = CBB_START_16_IO; TUNABLE_INT("hw.cbb.start_16_io", (int *)&cbb_start_16_io); SYSCTL_ULONG(_hw_cbb, OID_AUTO, start_16_io, CTLFLAG_RW, &cbb_start_16_io, CBB_START_16_IO,

Re: problems with wi driver.

2003-08-14 Thread Robert =?unknown-8bit?q?Blacqui=E8re?=
Mmhh, must have been blind... i was looking for it a very long time (without my eyes .) Thanks !!! Robert On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 11:21:36PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : Is there a better way to toggle the start address for 16 bit and 32 bit > : cards with sysctl?? > > u_long cbb_s

Re: Problems with Adaptec 2120s

2003-01-16 Thread Scott Long
Andrzej Kwiatkowski wrote: Hello.. I would like to install 4.7-Release on my Intel 1210 server. I've got Adaptec 2120s iserted and two 72Gb disk configured as Raid 1. When i start to install everything is ok, but when system boots i've got : **MONITOR** NormPrioCommand was received with Fib Str

RE: Problems with Adaptec 2120s

2003-01-16 Thread Matt Hartzell
I had issues with 4.7 Release and the Adaptec 2120 as well. I installed 5.0 RC3 using the ISO image and both my 2120 and 2200 controllers are working fine. I don't know what use you are putting this server to, might CURRENT be a solution? After compiling my kernel with out debugging options turn

RE: Problems with Adaptec 2120s

2003-01-16 Thread Andrzej Kwiatkowski
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Matt Hartzell wrote: > I had issues with 4.7 Release and the Adaptec 2120 as well. I installed > 5.0 RC3 using the ISO image and both my 2120 and 2200 controllers are > working fine. > > I don't know what use you are putting this server to, might CURRENT be a > solution? Aft

Re: Problems with Adaptec 2120s

2003-01-16 Thread Andrzej Kwiatkowski
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Scott Long wrote: > This is a known issue that I am working on correcting. Right now there > is no workaround that I know of. Stay tuned =-) > > Scott What can i do ?? I want FreeBSD not Linux as my server... and 4.7 is the best candidate for it... Thanks in advance Andrz

Re: Problems with Current & XFree86

2003-02-10 Thread leafy
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 11:20:24AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > Since it works with 4.7-STABLE it must(?) be a current problem > more than a XFree86 problem. Or? > > Any suggestions? > > -- > Gunnar Flygt, SR Could you paste your /var/log/XFree86*.log with the error parts? Maybe some will be ab

Re: Problems with Current & XFree86

2003-02-10 Thread Bakul Shah
> Since it works with 4.7-STABLE it must(?) be a current problem > more than a XFree86 problem. Or? I had the same problem -- something to do with files left over from the original 4.7 installation. Cured by deinstalling XFree86-* ports, renaming /usr/X11R6 to something else (in case something wa

Re: problems with umass device

2003-02-24 Thread Ned Wolpert
I've got a cheesy cigar-pro USB flash-drive (256MB) that works fine on current (as of last night) > -- Thus, Richard Nyberg had said: > Hello current-users! > > I'm not having any luck getting my USB flash drive to work. > The machine runs current as of today (24:th feb). > Below is the output I

Re: problems with umass device

2003-02-25 Thread Richard Nyberg
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:11:14PM -0700, Ned Wolpert wrote: > I've got a cheesy cigar-pro USB flash-drive (256MB) that works fine on > current (as of last night) Oh! I know that many other umass devices work ;) What I meant to ask was if anybody knew how to make FreeBSD to work with my creative n

Re: Problems with clock (fwd)

2003-03-30 Thread Friedemann Becker
-- Forwarded message -- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:18:35 +0100 (CET) From: Friedemann Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Andris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problems with clock Try this one. I had the same problem, and de fix described put the clock back to norm

Re: problems with natd, ipfw

2002-07-07 Thread Richard Seaman, Jr.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:35:46PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I upgraded to yesterday's -CURRENT and have made a few observations: > 2) and much more alarmingly: Although the new ipfw really seems to > process the ruleset faster, some rules appear to do nothing! I > ha

Re: problems with natd, ipfw

2002-07-07 Thread Richard Seaman, Jr.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 04:45:52PM -0500, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: > On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:35:46PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > > I upgraded to yesterday's -CURRENT and have made a few observations: > > > 2) and much more alarmingly: Although the new ipfw real

RE: Problems booting recent -current

2001-06-04 Thread John Baldwin
On 03-Jun-01 Tony Fleisher wrote: > I just tried to boot a -current kernel cvsupped > at Sat Jun 2 14:11:35 PDT 2001, and was thrown > the following error trying to boot to single-user > (transcribed by hand): > > src/sys/kern/kern_sync.c:385 sleeping with "eventhandler" > locked from src/sys

RE: Problems booting recent -current

2001-06-04 Thread Tony Fleisher
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 03-Jun-01 Tony Fleisher wrote: > > I just tried to boot a -current kernel cvsupped > > at Sat Jun 2 14:11:35 PDT 2001, and was thrown > > the following error trying to boot to single-user > > (transcribed by hand): > > > > src/sys/kern/kern_sync.

RE: Problems booting recent -current

2001-06-05 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-Jun-01 Tony Fleisher wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > >> >> On 03-Jun-01 Tony Fleisher wrote: >> > I just tried to boot a -current kernel cvsupped >> > at Sat Jun 2 14:11:35 PDT 2001, and was thrown >> > the following error trying to boot to single-user >> > (transcrib

RE: Problems booting recent -current

2001-06-08 Thread Tony Fleisher
After blowing away my obj/ and src/ directories and getting them fresh, this problem was no longer present... not sure what caused them, but either I had something strange in my obj/ or src/ tree, or the problem was fixed in the last week. Regards, Tony. On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, John Baldwin wrote:

Re: Problems with md5 -p

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 09:25:22, stephen (Stephen Montgomery-Smith) wrote about "Problems with md5 -p": I reproduce it stably on my -current. The second checksum is constant and it is MD5 checksum of an empty stream: root@iv:/usr/HEAD/src/sbin/md5##md5 Suppose I have a file xxx. If I type >

Re: Problems with md5 -p

2001-06-24 Thread Stephen Montgomery-Smith
OK, I'm going to make this into a PR so that it gets fixed soon. (The problem in stable appeared between May 19 and June 16.) Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 09:25:22, stephen (Stephen Montgomery-Smith) wrote about >"Problems with md5 -p": > > I reproduce it stably on my -c

Re: Problems with md5 -p

2001-06-24 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 13:16:07, stephen (Stephen Montgomery-Smith) wrote about "Re: Problems with md5 -p": > OK, I'm going to make this into a PR so that it gets fixed soon. (The > problem in stable appeared between May 19 and June 16.) Yes, it appeared with commits: r

RE: problems compiling various things...

2001-12-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Dec-01 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > With a freshly cvsupped version of CURRENT, cross-compiled on a > 4.3 box, (after the usual stdio.h fix related to the FILE handling), > I am having problems compiling several programs, with errors such > as the ones attached at the end. Just use WARNS=0 or some

Re: Problems in making world

2000-12-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:06:12AM +0300, Hostas Red wrote: > I have a following problem in making world for some time already: ... > Any suggestions? rm -rf /usr/obj/* cd /usr/src && make cleandir update your /usr/src and try again To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscr

Re: Problems in making world

2000-12-06 Thread Hostas Red
Hi! On Tue, 5 Dec 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 11:06:12AM +0300, Hostas Red wrote: > > I have a following problem in making world for some time already: > ... > > Any suggestions? > > rm -rf /usr/obj/* > cd /usr/src && make cleandir > update your /usr/src and try again

Re: problems with today's world

2001-02-16 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Ilya Naumov wrote: > i have installed today's world and now cannot compile almost anyting (incuding the >same world) because as (gnu assembler) coredumps every time. > > it could be because of the older kernel (built yesterday), but i cannot recomile it >due to the problem described above. any

Re: problems with today's world

2001-02-16 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ilya Naumov writes: : i have installed today's world and now cannot compile almost anyting (incuding the :same world) because as (gnu assembler) coredumps every time. A patch was installed to fix this. If you can grab an old as, you can fix this with a recompile o

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Theo van Klaveren wrote: > > When installing the 08-dec-1999 snapshot (before ATA went in GENERIC), > a recompile from the kernel with the ATA driver instead of the WD > driver resulted in an unbootable system because of the following > error (approx.): > > mounting root /dev/ad0s1a >

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Theo van Klaveren
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > Harddisks: Western Digital Caviar (2.0 GB), non-DMA and > >Western Digital Caviar (2.5 GB), DMA-33. > > Mainboard: Asus P5A-B Super7 > > Chipset: ALi Aladdin V AGPset > > It probably because I relaxed the requirements for doing WDMA on di

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Theo van Klaveren wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > > Harddisks: Western Digital Caviar (2.0 GB), non-DMA and > > >Western Digital Caviar (2.5 GB), DMA-33. > > > Mainboard: Asus P5A-B Super7 > > > Chipset: ALi Aladdin V AGPset > > > > It probably becau

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Richard J Kuhns
Soren Schmidt writes: > It seems Theo van Klaveren wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > > > > > Harddisks: Western Digital Caviar (2.0 GB), non-DMA and > > > >Western Digital Caviar (2.5 GB), DMA-33. > > > > Mainboard: Asus P5A-B Super7 > > > > Chipset: ALi

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Doug White
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > > Harddisks: Western Digital Caviar (2.0 GB), non-DMA and > >Western Digital Caviar (2.5 GB), DMA-33. > > Mainboard: Asus P5A-B Super7 > > Chipset: ALi Aladdin V AGPset > > It probably because I relaxed the requirements for doing WDMA on di

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Doug White wrote: > > > > It probably because I relaxed the requirements for doing WDMA on disks > > that doesn't bother to tell whihc verson of the ATA spec they conform to. > > I think your case is the more seldom one, but I'm this close to > > blacklisting all WD/Maxtor drives, that w

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Peter Wemm
Theo van Klaveren wrote: > > When installing the 08-dec-1999 snapshot (before ATA went in GENERIC), > a recompile from the kernel with the ATA driver instead of the WD > driver resulted in an unbootable system because of the following > error (approx.): > > mounting root /dev/ad0s1a > ata-mast

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Matthew Dillon
:> it broke again as I recompiled my system yesterday (This was the first :> time after it had been fixed, so I don't know when exactly it broke). :> :> Harddisks: Western Digital Caviar (2.0 GB), non-DMA and :>Western Digital Caviar (2.5 GB), DMA-33. :> Mainboard: Asus P5A-B Super7 :

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Peter Wemm wrote: > > Same here, but with a toshiba laptop disk. I have to comment out a version > test in ata-disk.c to get it to work. I've just a few hours ago committed a change that does this... > > --- ata-disk.c 1999/12/18 20:06:30 1.46 > +++ ata-disk.c 1999/12/21 21:48:2

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Matthew Dillon wrote: > > The thread 'vm_page_remove panic' that Tamiji Homma initiated may be > related. She is getting a panic in the buffer cache subsystem while > using the new ATA driver with softupdates + NFS exported filesystems. > > I do not know if it is relat

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-21 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Soren Schmidt wrote: > It probably because I relaxed the requirements for doing WDMA on disks > that doesn't bother to tell whihc verson of the ATA spec they conform to. > I think your case is the more seldom one, but I'm this close to > blacklisting all WD/Maxtor drives, tha

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Alex Zepeda wrote: > > Perhaps blacklisting all WD/Maxtor drives that don't report an ATA > version, as the ata (and wd) driver works flawlessly in UDMA33 mode with > my setup: Hmm, thats an idea... > ata-pci0: at device 7.1 on pci0 > ata-pci0: Busmastering DMA supported > ata0 at 0x0

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Pim van Grol wrote: > For your information: > > I encountered the same problem on a MVP3 board (Epox ep-mvp3g-m) > with via vt82c596, which worked well untill 13-12-99. Matrox HD. Are you sure you mean 596 ?? that is NOT supported (yet). > Correctly interpreted as doing UDMA33. From ve

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Nick Hibma
> If you end up doing this, can you have the driver print a line letting > people know this is intentional? i.e., > > ad0: DMA disabled: This drive does not properly support DMA mode. > ad0: To force DMA for this drive (at your own risk) set flags 0xXX. Let's not go the Linux way and make the

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Nick Hibma wrote: > > If you end up doing this, can you have the driver print a line letting > > people know this is intentional? i.e., > > > > ad0: DMA disabled: This drive does not properly support DMA mode. > > ad0: To force DMA for this drive (at your own risk) set flags 0xXX. >

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Nick Hibma
> > Mentioning it in the manpage should be sufficient I guess. Blacklisting > > devices sounds like a good idea if tey fail to work correctly in many > > cases. > > The problem being how to get a list that is "good enough" for the > majority of cases. I'd like to see it the other way around: Mak

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Nick Hibma wrote: > > > Mentioning it in the manpage should be sufficient I guess. Blacklisting > > > devices sounds like a good idea if tey fail to work correctly in many > > > cases. > > > > The problem being how to get a list that is "good enough" for the > > majority of cases. > > I

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Jeroen C. van Gelderen
Nick Hibma wrote: > > > If you end up doing this, can you have the driver print a line letting > > people know this is intentional? i.e., > > > > ad0: DMA disabled: This drive does not properly support DMA mode. > > ad0: To force DMA for this drive (at your own risk) set flags 0xXX. > > Let's n

Re: Problems with the ATA-driver

1999-12-22 Thread Darryl Okahata
Soren Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems Nick Hibma wrote: > > > If you end up doing this, can you have the driver print a line letting > > > people know this is intentional? i.e., > > > > > > ad0: DMA disabled: This drive does not properly support DMA mode. > > > ad0: To force DMA

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >