Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Mon, 12 Dec 2016, at 17:20, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Have you considered using things like poudriere that would allow you to > > build > > your own repository with your own set of packages and options. > > > > You will benefit: > > - ability to use pkg for your upgrades > > - ability to use

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote: > >On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: > >> On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: > >> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote: >>On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: > >>(But portupgrade could at times be an utter mess, >>I never looked back after

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 2016-Dec-15 19:31:22 +0100, list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote: >On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: >> > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: >> > >> >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Although

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

> Here, it doesn't look like that. Don't forget that /usr/ports/distfiles > accumulates old versions and must be manually cleaned out from time to > time. portmaster has a couple of options to remove distfiles that are > not needed. > > % du -hd0 /usr/ports > 8.1G/usr/ports > % du -hd0

sysutils/php56-fileinfo exit signal Segmentation fault

I am running webmail Roundcube on many machines but on one machine file upload (attachment) doesn't work. I tracked it down to PHP extension fileinfo. Everytime I tried to upload a file I got this error in Apache error log: [Fri Dec 16 02:35:27.775113 2016] [core:notice] [pid 6883] AH00052:

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

Matthieu Volat wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:31:22 +0100 list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote: On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

John Marino freebsd.contact at marino.st on Thu Dec 15 16:46:54 UTC 2016 wrote: > For i386 and amd64 users, synth does not require more resources than > portmaster. People on those platforms can't use "resources" as a reason > not to use Synth. From what I can tell, portmaster people hate

can somebody commit this fix for isc-dhcp43 port?

net/isc-dhcp43-server: rc script does not play nice with service -e https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213463 Reported at October, added patch and poudriere log but still uncommitted. Reminded at November and? Still not committed. Miroslav Lachman

CFT: OpenVPN 2.4 port update for FreeBSD

Greetings, I've put up an OpenVPN 2.4-rc1 port for FreeBSD up for testing. Get it from https://people.freebsd.org/~mandree/openvpn-2.4.r1-v1.tar.xz Or review the diff at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D8813 Cheers, Matthias signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: No port should need root for make fetch

On 2016-Dec-15 09:43:51 +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >Le 14/12/2016 à 06:17, Peter Jeremy a écrit : >> On 2016-Dec-13 21:32:36 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >>> IMO No port should need root for >>> cd /usr/ports; make -i fetch >> In a stock FreeBSD

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 19:31:22 +0100 list-freebsd-po...@jyborn.se wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: > > On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > > > > > >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: > > >>> > > >>>

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 01:18:05PM -0500, George Mitchell wrote: > On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > > > >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: > >>> > >>> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an > >>> outside

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 12/15/16 09:40, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > >> On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: >>> >>> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an >>> outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So >>> use it or die.

Auditorías a través del Buzón Tributario

En línea y en Vivo / Para todo su Equipo con una sola Conexión Auditorías a través del Buzón Tributario 29 de diciembre - Online en Vivo - 10:00 a 13:00 Hrs A través de esta Capacitación Online en Vivo entérese cuáles son los sectores involucrados, en qué consisten dichas

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

John Marino wrote on 2016/12/15 17:46: [1] I've got it on my todo list to provide a new method that would eliminate the "my builder just rebuilt 150 packages, but pkg(8) only upgraded 2 packages" issue that some users don't want to see. It's a lot more complicated than the conservative yet

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

I want to talk about another issue: the testing of ports framework We usually test our ports via poudriere or synth. We have a greate ports framework to help us build software, and we only need to write a few lines of code to leveage it. But ... where is the testing of the framework ? Those code

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 17:46, John Marino wrote: On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote: It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well. No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement. portmaster was added 2006 and the

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 12/15/2016 10:31, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote: It is every week. Consider the FreeBSD forums as well. No, it isn't. Lets check the history. This is just a general statement. portmaster was added 2006 and the portstree startet in 1994. Can you agree

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

Vlad K. wrote: The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes. That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In practice, however: 1. The Q branch is cut off at predetermined dates (ie.

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 17:00, John Marino wrote: On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 2016/12/15 16:01, Olivier Duchateau wrote: >> The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source >> based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo; >> FreeBSD is the one that have the most instability. Not to mention >> committers that commit without testing

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 14:16:18 +0100 David Demelier wrote: > 2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. : > > The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages > > that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 12/15/2016 09:49, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 15 Dec 2016 07:40:46 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: > > > On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: > >> > >> Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is > >> an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On 15.12.2016 16:29, John Marino wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to get portmaster deprecated and removed from the

The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to get

munin-master won't build: no 'module_name' or MANIFEST file

Hi, I'm trying to rebuild munin-master but keep running into this: cd master && /usr/local/bin/perl Build.PL No 'module_name' was provided and it could not be inferred from other properties. This will prevent a packlist from being written for this file. Please set either 'module_name' or

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Matt Smith wrote: On Dec 08 05:16, Daniil Berendeev wrote: Although portmaster is not releated to the FreeBSD project and is an outside tool, there aren't any alternatives from the project itself. So use it or die. Not a nice situation. People have been trying to get

Re: The ports collection has some serious issues

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016, Daniil Berendeev wrote: 5) svn repository. I don't want to spark a holy war and I don't belong to those type of people who are always obsessed that something isn't done in their way. But guys, svn is not a good tool for ports. Just for one reason, actually (as for me, I

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote on 2016/12/15 14:43: The problem is that there are no tests in FreeBSD ports. All source based systems I've tested: pkgsrc, FreeBSD ports, OpenBSD, Gentoo; FreeBSD is the one that have the most instability. Not to mention committers that commit without testing the

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

On 15.12.2016 14:16, David Demelier wrote: 2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. : The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes. That is the theory and intent behind

Re: (In)Stability of the Quarterly Branch

2016-11-16 13:17 GMT+01:00 Vlad K. : > The quarterly branch (Q) is intended to provide a set of "stable" packages > that in the lifetime of such a branch, receive only bug and security fixes. > That is the theory and intent behind the branch. In practice, however: > >

Make index fails with no entry for /usr/ports/audio/linux-c7-mikmod

curlew:/root# freebsd-version -ku 11.0-RELEASE-p2 11.0-RELEASE-p5 curlew:/root# make -C /usr/ports index Generating INDEX-11 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- [snip] --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- make_index:

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

Re: No port should need root for make fetch

Le 14/12/2016 à 06:17, Peter Jeremy a écrit : > On 2016-Dec-13 21:32:36 +0100, "Julian H. Stacey" wrote: >> IMO No port should need root for >> cd /usr/ports; make -i fetch > In a stock FreeBSD install, all ports require root to both fetch and build. > You have customised