Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-28 Thread Mel Pilgrim
I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, make errors out with: ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater, but you have 1.5.6. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port first. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/sec

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-28 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, > make errors out with: > > ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater, > but you have 1.5.6. You must upgrade the ports-mgmt/pkg port fir

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-28 21:31, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but when I do, make errors out with: ===> openssh-portable-7.1.p1_2,1 pkg(8) must be version 1.6.0 or greater, but you have 1.5.6. You must

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, On 09/29/2015 02:12 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-28 21:31, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 4:41 PM, Mel Pilgrim >> wrote: >> >>> I'm trying to build and install security/openssh-portable, but >>> when I do, make error

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-29 08:24, Janky Jay, III wrote: I ran into this exact same issue using SVN and portmaster to upgrade 'git'. Upgrading 'pkg' using portmaster (portmaster -d 'pkg-1.5.6') before running 'portmaster -ad' fixed the issue. Generally, though, portmaster usually updates pkg first and

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 29/09/2015 21:34, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > The ports system was changed to make mandatory a version of pkg that was > not available by the default method. That's a POLA violation, but it > appears no one wants to talk about it. To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch w

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Roger Marquis
Matthew Seaman wrote: > To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch > with ports compiled from head? If you use ports/pkgs from a consistent > source then you won't suffer from this problem. There are many reasons to use ports and many to use packages. These reasons are

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-29 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 01:34:23PM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-29 08:24, Janky Jay, III wrote: > > I ran into this exact same issue using SVN and portmaster to upgrade > > 'git'. Upgrading 'pkg' using portmaster (portmaster -d 'pkg-1.5.6') > > before running 'portmaster -ad' fixed th

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Baptiste Daroussin writes: > The change that was made was having the default packages on releases point to > quarterly branch of the ports tree. This was noted in the release note. Yes, but that really only helps people who already understand version control. I'll try to come up with some text t

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Roger Marquis
For the vast majority of ports and packages it won't make any difference whether they are installed are from head, quarterly and/or archives (in my experience, options dependencies aside). Isn't the issue here a dependency on the version of 'pkg' being enforced by 'pkg'? If so shouldn't this be f

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Lowell Gilbert
"Roger Marquis" writes: > For the vast majority of ports and packages it won't make any difference > whether they are installed are from head, quarterly and/or archives (in my > experience, options dependencies aside). Isn't the issue here a dependency on > the version of 'pkg' being enforced by

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-09-30 Thread Thomas Mueller
I just went to svnweb.freebsd.org with Firefox web browser, and see the difference with branches of ports and base. I clicked on ports, then branches, then 2015Q3, then ports-mgmt, and see that the version of pkg is 1.5.6. But I use only the head branch. Quarterly ports branches are comparable

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Mel Pilgrim
On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote: In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between the two. More to the point, that using the defau

Re: Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

2015-10-01 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 10/1/2015 3:28 AM, Mel Pilgrim wrote: > On 2015-09-30 16:16, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >> In short, there is nothing broken in pkg(8) per se. I am pretty sure >> this problem does not come up if you do everything from quarterly or >> everything from head; it's strictly an issue of conflicts between