xorg.conf

This works but i still get a warning no matching device section for instance busid PCI:2:0:1 found How can i get rit of the warning ? Does somebody know how to tweak the xorg.conf for a radeon 9800xt so all features are enabled ? Does BusID "PCI:2:0:0" need to be "PCI:2:0:1" ? # # /

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

What did you changed in kernel CONFIG ? My original kernel was the GENERIC kernel that was included on the distribution CD. I only added some options to that, did not remove anything. Added things were: NETGRAPH (all netgraph modules) HZ=1000 DUMMYNET BRIDGE (can it be the problem?) and some

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote: Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar if using ipfw ) I hope this helps. Vladimir Vladimir Dvorak I set firewall_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf Did not work. Please also note that I did not change my configuration on this machine, I just com

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

Try to turn off your firewall first. ( pfctl -d or something similar if using ipfw ) I hope this helps. Vladimir Vladimir Dvorak I set firewall_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf Did not work. Please also note that I did not change my configuration on this machine, I just compiled a new kernel. All

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

Laszlo Zsolt Nagy wrote: Hi All! I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network 172.16.0/20 messias>ping 127.0.0.1 ping:sendto:no route to host messias>n

Re: no route to host - urgent problem

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:20:23 +0100 Laszlo Zsolt Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake thus: > > Hi All! > > > I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with > ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. > This is a router, the other device is connected to a local net

no route to host - urgent problem

Hi All! I could compile a new kernel (4.8 p27). It logs in to an ADSL line with ppp (tun0 created). But I cannot ping even myself. This is a router, the other device is connected to a local network 172.16.0/20 messias>ping 127.0.0.1 ping:sendto:no route to host messias>netstat -nr Destination

Re: Question about install. (two hard drives, install freebsd on second)

You can install FreeBSD indepedently on its own drive while another OS coexists on a previous drive in your system. You would most likely want to use an alternate bootloader installed on the mater boot record of the first drive.. such as GAG or Grub.. but the FreeBSD bootloader works just as w

Question about install. (two hard drives, install freebsd on second)

I am currently stuck running Windows Me on a Dell Desktop Pentium 3 1ghrtz with 512mb ram. I recently dusted off a old hard drive that contains a whole 2 gigs of hard drive space. I have installed the hard disk drive and am wanting to install "FreeBsd" on it. Before I go about mucking things

Re: Which ports use C++?

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:53:05PM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote: Or should I more or less expect that I need to rebuild *all* the ports anyway? That's best; there are other incompatibilities that are there when you have old (compiled on 5.2) versions of a library and you try and co

Re: cannot build openoffice

Jason Henson wrote: On 03/16/05 20:23:13, Christopher Kelley wrote: Brian John wrote: dmake: Error code 1, while making './unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/so_moz_runtime_files' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Does anyone know why this might happen or what I

Re: Ports and Packages: Updating problems

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 07:25 pm, Gerry Freymann wrote: > I just upgraded from FreeBSD 4.9R to 4.11R (cvsup'd sources and > ports, buildworld, buildkernel, etc). > > Then I went to work on upgrading my ports. Portupgrade and some > manual intervention did a fairly decent job. > > I used the "por

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

Thanks to all who replied. So it seems the consensus is a likely hardware issue, and I am leaning that way as well now. I will try the suggestion about disabling ACPI however. To address some of the other comments, that exact CPU-mobo-memory configuration worked fine running Win2000 for many ye

Ports and Packages: Updating problems

I just upgraded from FreeBSD 4.9R to 4.11R (cvsup'd sources and ports, buildworld, buildkernel, etc). Then I went to work on upgrading my ports. Portupgrade and some manual intervention did a fairly decent job. I used the "ports" which compiled mostly everything (Xfree-4 went fine too) but it ne

DSL LAN Sharing with FreeBSD-5.3+natd+ipfw

hi, how do i permanently set the rules for ipfw? whenever i restart my FreeBSD server which has natd & firewall enabled, the ipfw returns to default which is "65535 151 14646 deny ip from any to any". so i need to repeat "ipfw -f flush" and execute the commands below so that my LAN can access the

Re: Ethernet issue: works one way but not another

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:06:32 -0500, John Allesee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This one has got me stumped. Been working on it for 3 days now with > no resolution. Please help. > > I have a 686 system that I just installed 5.3 on through ftp. So I > know that my network setup works. I have 2 ne

Re: <$100 SATA RAID Card 5.3 compatible

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:52:46PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > >> Is your solution better? > > > > You can deliver your own opinion, my resolution is at: > > http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/ > > I was able to make the atacontrol method work flawlessly via a

Ethernet issue: works one way but not another

This one has got me stumped. Been working on it for 3 days now with no resolution. Please help. I have a 686 system that I just installed 5.3 on through ftp. So I know that my network setup works. I have 2 networks that I am trying to access through. One network is connected to a 100mb 3com h

RE: <$100 SATA RAID Card 5.3 compatible

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Danny Howard wrote: > On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 07:37:24PM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: >> I tried following the instructions at: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ and couldn't make it work. >> >> I ended up installi

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:49:05PM -0500, Danny wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > > > With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > > > > > Should I be concerned about my ser

Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 91, Issue 41

On 03/16/05 20:23:13, Christopher Kelley wrote: Brian John wrote: Hello, When I try to build openoffice I get the following error: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/libprldap50.so && \ echo >& / dev/null cp: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/libnss3.so: No such file or directory dmak

Re: No rebuild on make buildworld

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:21 pm, Frank de Bot wrote: > Hi, > > When I do make buildworld, the whole world is build from scratch > again. But I've noticed that some changes of my own will let it fail > and when I change it, the process starts over again!! > How can I build the world, without eve

Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 05:03 pm, you wrote: > On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote: > > If I just do: > > > > cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile && portmanager -u > > > > Do I need portupgrade at all then? > > I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two >

Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 91, Issue 41

Brian John wrote: Hello, When I try to build openoffice I get the following error: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/libprldap50.so && \ echo >& /dev/null cp: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/libnss3.so: No such file or directory dmake: Error code 1, while making './unxfbsd.pro/misc/b

No rebuild on make buildworld

Hi, When I do make buildworld, the whole world is build from scratch again. But I've noticed that some changes of my own will let it fail and when I change it, the process starts over again!! How can I build the world, without everything to be rebuild? Thanks in advanced, Frank de Bot __

Re: Illogical usage of swap

Colin J. Raven wrote: Hmm, yeah I should have included what I've actually read in the handbook and elsewhere. In fact I did read that exerpt you quoted the URL for above sometime previously, when it was quoted in another thread on the list. Free memory (or the lack thereof) isn't the issue tho

Re: FTP server on 5.3

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-03-17, Aperez scribbled these curious markings: > try to look into pure-ftpd. You might find your solutions with it As much as I've been tempted to recommend pure-ftpd in the course of reading this thread, I've restrained from doing so for one

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:59:27 +, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > > When is the last time a FreeBSD CVSup server was compromised - if ever? > > I don't know that it's ever happened. > > I don't know that that's really the thr

Re: Serial console

Am Dienstag, 15. März 2005 12:37 schrieb Daniel Bye: [...] > The machine boots - you see the BIOS POST, the SATA controller comes up, > then you see FreeBSD's boot messages on the console. As soon as the > kernel launches, we get the login: prompt and then nothing. So, we know > the hardware work

Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?

On Sunday 13 March 2005 20:05, Fafa Diliha Romanova wrote: > If I just do: > > cvsup -g -L 2 /etc/cvsupfile && portmanager -u > > Do I need portupgrade at all then? I think you do, as I understand the situation, portmanager lacks two significant features. 1. All ports have an implicit dependenc

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:49:05PM -0500, Danny wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > > > With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > > > > > Should I be concerned about my ser

Re: inode

On 03/16/05 08:06:03, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2005-03-16 13:49, Gert Cuykens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:27:21 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Show us the output of: >> >> # df -ik > > $ df -ik > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capac

Re: FTP server on 5.3

try to look into pure-ftpd. You might find your solutions with it On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:30:19 -0500 Charles Swiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: > > I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was > > using > > the handbook an

RE: Question

>From the handbook version-bootonly.iso - Everything you need to boot into a FreeBSD kernel and start the installation interface. The installable files have to be pulled over FTP or some other supported source. version-mini.iso - Everything you need to install FreeBSD. version-disc1.iso -

Re: Question

Bnonn wrote: >Actually, I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this either. What is >CD2 for? I've never had occasion to use it. >Jonathan Farrugia wrote: > > Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD > v5.3 from the following server: > [1]"ftp://ftp

Re: Question

Actually, I wouldn't mind knowing the answer to this either. What is CD2 for? I've never had occasion to use it. Jonathan Farrugia wrote: Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD v5.3 from the following server: [1]"ftp://ftp2.ru.freebsd.org/pub/FreeB

Question

Hi, My Name is Jonathan Farrugia and In Just Downloaded FreeBSD v5.3 from the following server: "ftp://ftp2.ru.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ISO-IMAGES-i386/5.3/"; and i downloaded disc1 and disc2, and then i got confused cause the name of disc1 was "fbsd_miniinst" and the name of disc2 was "fbsd_liv

Re: "Connection refused"

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:33:10PM -, Vince wrote: > > > > > > > This is strange; I just allowed telnet in /etc/inetd.conf and > > reinitialized; from here on sage/ns1, this. > > No need to enable telnet in inetd.conf if you're just using it to test > a tcp connection to another

sendmail is reaching "tao" once more...

The reason that mail (and other connections) were "refused" from my primary nameserver to here had to do with a missing line in /etc/rc.conf. Could it be this??: defaultrouter="10.0.0.1" I had the DHCP ifconfig line set correctly. If it isn't the

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:35:56 +, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > > With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > > > Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD > > guru's refuse to use CVS

Re: Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 06:06:07PM -0500, Danny wrote: > With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ > > Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD > guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is this overkill? Depends on your threat model, i.e. what are you afraid of?

Re: NFS and rc.conf options (statd lockd, necessary?)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:29:57PM -0800, Benjamin Keating wrote: > rpc_lockd_enable="NO" # Run NFS rpc.lockd needed for client/server. > rpc_statd_enable="NO" # Run NFS rpc.statd needed for client/server. > > > > Are these to be used or are they obsolete? I don't unders

NFS and rc.conf options (statd lockd, necessary?)

Im running FreeBSD 5.2.1 and 5.3 machines The server is 5.2.1 and has the following in it's rc.conf: nfs_client_enable="YES" # This host is an NFS client (YES/NO). nfs_reserved_port_only="YES" # Provide NFS only on secure port (YES/NO). nfs_server_enable="YES" # This

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 22:49, Boris Spirialitious wrote: > No, we have product that run on intel machine. It > would be nice if we could use same image for both > intel and operton platforms. You can, provided you use the i386 version of FreeBSD and don't optimize the build for anything abov

Failure with php4 and libgd support

Hello, I'm having some problems with php4 and libgd support. I'm running FreeBSD/i386 5.3 which was upgraded from the 4.x STABLE branch a long time ago, but I think a portion of the upgrade may've gone horribly wrong with regards to the compiler or include files. Most things compile fine

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

Boris, I would agree that my initial impression of 5.3 was that it was slow compared to 4.x. After some tuning, I now have 5.3 running at an acceptable performance level. You may want to start testing the newer versions of 5 current. I have noticed improved performance on my test servers and b

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

John, That did the trick. I built a new kernel with the GEOM_STRIPE option and added an entry to my fstab to mount the volume(stripe) and everything worked like a charm. In the end this turned out to be much simpler than I had anticipated. I wish this information would have been available in t

Portsnap necessary? CVSup insecure?

With regards to: http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ Should I be concerned about my servers that use CVSup? Do the FreeBSD guru's refuse to use CVSup, or is this overkill? Thank you, ...D ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.

Re: Makefiles compatible with both BSD and GNU make?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:50:17PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > > FreeBSD's make understands the gnu-style include syntax with no leading > dot, even though it's undocumented (grep for SYSVINCLUDE in the > source). Automake is the usual way around compatibility issues; it has > its own conditional

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

--- cyb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html > > Looks like you will need to use 5.3-release (or > 5.3-stable/5.4-prerelease if you have more than > 4GB). > > Why can you not use 5.3? 5.3 is too slow, and we have custom code. Why use faster hardware just to u

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

--- Stas Myasnikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:43:33 -0800 (PST), Boris > Spirialitious > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ïèñàë(à): > > >> When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have > 4.9. > >> is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x. > > AFAIK FreeBSD4 isn't run on amd64 in

RE: "Connection refused"

> > > > This is strange; I just allowed telnet in /etc/inetd.conf and > reinitialized; from here on sage/ns1, this. No need to enable telnet in inetd.conf if you're just using it to test a tcp connection to another host, that's only if you want to be able to log on to the host f

Re: flash plugin?

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 01:49, Tom Vilot wrote: > I have the port flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.12 installed (using > firefox-1.0.1_2,1). I find that it crashes firefox pretty consistently. > > However, a quick grep of flash in the ports reveals these: > > > flash-0.9.5 > flashplugin-0.4.3 > flashplug

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

On Mar 16, 2005, at 4:44 PM, kalin mintchev wrote: You were exceeding the amount of socket buffer memory available there. i'm aware of that. the question is why? The literal answer is that this pool of open connections with lots of unsent data is clogging things up. Why those connections are not

Re: /bin/sh, php & mysql

George Dew wrote: After "upgrading" to BSD 4.11, I've been having all sorts of problems. Please help! - The shell no longer supports the "up" cursor key, which gives a history of commands that you type. Which shell you were using before upgrade ? And which one do u use now ? Just change it to one,t

Spare local IP address - not physical alias

Hello! I have people connecting to my server via ppp. When they establish connection the server gets 172.18.0.1 and they get 172.18.0.x. A dns server is running on 172.18.0.1. The problem is that sometimes there are no ppp connections, and the server does not have the 172.18.0.1 address. But I want

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 03:10, Jean Lagarde wrote: > I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I > might have enough clues now to get some useful hints from an expert. > > FreeBSD 5.3-release (see dmesg below for details) > > The problem seems to be with trying to run wi

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

Nick Pavlica wrote: >Andrea, > I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to >this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe >persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A >40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

thanks Charles... > > You were exceeding the amount of socket buffer memory available there. i'm aware of that. the question is why? >>> huge difference. so i think about 260 lines of netstat -p tcp output >>> like: >>> >>> tcp4 0 33580 server.http c68.112.166.214..3307 >>>

Re: Install squirrelmail

Thanks. I will try it asap. Am Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:28:46PM -0600 W. D. schrieb: > Please see comments below: > > At 10:55 3/16/2005, Martin Schweizer wrote: > >Hello > > > >I want to install squirrelmail from ports (cvsuped today). Make runs without > >problems but after make install the fol

Re: FreeBSD 5.3+ Vinum or Gvinum

Andrea, I have started testing with gstripe and have had good results to this point. I'm still a little unclear about how to make my stripe persistent after a reboot? My server consists of three drives. A 40GB drive that has the operating system and two 200Gb drives that I'm using for the raid

Re: FTP server on 5.3

On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:56 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote: I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wanted to know if I can safley delete the .*

Re: Install squirrelmail

Please see comments below: At 10:55 3/16/2005, Martin Schweizer wrote: >Hello > >I want to install squirrelmail from ports (cvsuped today). Make runs without >problems but after make install the following error occurs: > >Build complete. >(It is safe to ignore warnings about tempnam and tmpnam).

Re: FTP server on 5.3

> On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:56:12 -0800 (PST), Joshua Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using > the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked > fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wa

FTP server on 5.3

I was trying to setup an FTP server last night on my 5.3 box. I was using the handbook and was instructed to make a new user ftp. So that worked fine and I was able to upload to ftp's home dirrectory but wanted to know if I can safley delete the .* files in his home dirrectory. I was also curious,

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 12:45:07PM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: > I too have a similar problem. I have 7 identical systems. all with > identical MoBo's SCSI hard drives and RAM. > > One machine reboots frequently with 5.3 where with 4.9 it "never" > rebooted. 6 machines are fine. 1 reboots. I chang

Re: Makefiles compatible with both BSD and GNU make?

In the last episode (Mar 16), David Kelly said: > I got the silly idea that I want one Makefile to work with both BSD > and GNU makes. Silly me. Fairly simple Makefiles work but when > expanding my Makefile to include .depend generation I get tripped. > > BSD make automagically uses .depend if one

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

Jean Lagarde wrote: I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I might have enough clues now to get some useful hints from an expert. FreeBSD 5.3-release (see dmesg below for details) The problem seems to be with trying to run with 1.5GB vice 512MB of RAM. The system has

Re: upgrade 5.3 to 5.4

I believe that this would do it, but I don't think they have created the 5_4 branch yet. Of course I haven't looked today :) Please keep in mind that the 5_4 final is still a few weeks out. --Nick On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:29:35 +0200, Perttu Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi! > > If I want

Makefiles compatible with both BSD and GNU make?

I got the silly idea that I want one Makefile to work with both BSD and GNU makes. Silly me. Fairly simple Makefiles work but when expanding my Makefile to include .depend generation I get tripped. BSD make automagically uses .depend if one is found. GNU make requires the file be named in an inclu

Re: 5.3-release fine with 512MB RAM, reboots at times with 1.5GB (but no panic)

I would have to agree that it is a HW issue. The RAM itself may be ok, but may have issues with other HW components in your system. --Nick On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:10:27 -0800, Jean Lagarde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been troubleshooting reboots over the last weekend, I think I > might h

Re: accounting package

I have had good luck with sql-ledger. --Nick On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:30:06 -0500, Harry Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am looking for a client server accounting package for industrial equipment > dealers and distributors that will handle serialized whole good inventory, > parts inventory and

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:01 PM, kalin mintchev wrote: 11125 requests for memory denied 1 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines You were exceeding the amount of socket buffer memory available there. huge difference. so i think about 260 lines of netstat -p tcp output like: tc

Re: FreeBSD 5.3: Sharedlibs using sharedlibs (and Tcl)

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:35:16PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: ! ! --On onsdag, mars 16, 2005 11.43.31 +0100 Peter Much ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ! ! >! So, you're saying that pctclsh *can* access, but pgaccess *cannot*? ! >Odd... ! I would expect they'd both use the same lib to connect,

Re: Which ports use C++?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 08:53:05PM +0200, Toomas Aas wrote: > Hello! > > I'm planning to upgrade one of my servers from RELENG_5_2 to RELENG_5_3. > In my reading of /usr/src/UPDATING I have reached the entry of 20040728 > which says that all programs written in C++ need to be recompiled. Ugh. >

/bin/sh, php & mysql

After "upgrading" to BSD 4.11, I've been having all sorts of problems. Please help! - The shell no longer supports the "up" cursor key, which gives a history of commands that you type. - Also, mod_php no longer supports mySQL. Does anyone know what's going on here? __

Re: kern.ipc.nmbclusters

where else can i ask about this? i tried bsdforums but still total silence there too... > >> Did you check top to see if you even use swap? > > yea. very small amount. > Swap: 2032M Total, 624K Used, 2031M Free > >> I never use swap with >> 512MB on my desktop. Read man tuning, around byte 3237

Re: What's difference between iconv and libiconv ports?

In the last episode (Mar 16), Stas Myasnikov said: > Could anyone tell me what's difference between iconv and libiconv > ports? iconv is a BSD-licensed charset conversion library (doesn't seem to have been unpdated since 2000), libiconv is the GNU one that most programs expect. -- Dan N

Which ports use C++?

Hello! I'm planning to upgrade one of my servers from RELENG_5_2 to RELENG_5_3. In my reading of /usr/src/UPDATING I have reached the entry of 20040728 which says that all programs written in C++ need to be recompiled. Ugh. Is there an easy way to find out whether particular port uses C++? I had

Re: cannot build openoffice

> Hello, > When I try to build openoffice I get the following error: > ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/FREEBSDGCCIruntime/libprldap50.so && \ echo >& > /dev/null > cp: ./unxfbsd.pro/misc/build/mozilla/dist/bin/libnss3.so: No such file or > directory > dmake: Error code 1, while making > './unxfbsd.pro/misc/bui

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html Looks like you will need to use 5.3-release (or 5.3-stable/5.4-prerelease if you have more than 4GB). Why can you not use 5.3? On Wed, 2005-03-16 at 09:43 -0800, Boris Spirialitious wrote: > --- Boris Spirialitious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Whe

Bind + CHROOT + -u binduser fails

Hi, I installed recently freebsd 5.3 from cd and i test the bind9 port of bind9-9.3.0 i installed correctly and i configure my own zones, but with a particular switches: rc.conf: named_enable="YES" # Run named, the DNS server (or NO). named_program="/usr/sbin/named" # path to nam

Re: DHCP server performance

On Mar 16, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Darryl Hoar wrote: Should I dedicate an entire machine to being a DHCP server ? Or will the load be minimal and I can put the DHCP server functionality on my webserver ? A DHCP server is very lightweight, and you can run one on a machine used for other tasks just fine

Re: DHCP server performance

> > Greetings, > I want to setup a DHCP server on my internal (private 192.168.1.X) network. > I already have a Freebsd machine on the network as a webserver. > > Should I dedicate an entire machine to being a DHCP server ? Or will > the load be minimal and I can put the DHCP server functionalit

DHCP server performance

Greetings, I want to setup a DHCP server on my internal (private 192.168.1.X) network. I already have a Freebsd machine on the network as a webserver. Should I dedicate an entire machine to being a DHCP server ? Or will the load be minimal and I can put the DHCP server functionality on my webserv

Re: 5.3 & IBM PC Server 325 Type 8639-1RY

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:18:35AM -0700, JM wrote: > I have installed 5.3 several times and I am using the built in > nic an PCI AMD card. To get the built-in NIC working on a 325, you will need to rebuild the kernel and comment out device pcn. You need device lnc, but pcn has precedence over lnc

Re: FreeBSD 4.x Opteron Question

--- Boris Spirialitious <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When opteron support start for Freebsd? I have 4.9. > is supported? Or 4.11 better? I can't use 5.x. > > Will a i386 disk boot on opteron system? Can I > use same disk image for intel and amd MBs? Any > big problems? > > Thanks, > > Boris D

Re: 5.3 & IBM PC Server 325 Type 8639-1RY

JM wrote: I have installed 5.3 several times and I am using the built in nic an PCI AMD card. I can not seem to change the card to full-duplex using ifconfig or the built in sysinstall. I noticed there appeared to be other problems with IBM machines. My ? is this a recognized problem or something n

What's difference between iconv and libiconv ports?

Hello. Could anyone tell me what's difference between iconv and libiconv ports? Bye. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: Where does FreeBSD install the Qt directory?

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:40:26 -0600 CHris Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Trying to compile mysqlcc from source (ports didn't work) and it says > install a version of Qt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/X11R6/include] > pkg_info | grep qt > qt-3.3.3_2 Multiplatform C++ application framework

5.3 & IBM PC Server 325 Type 8639-1RY

I have installed 5.3 several times and I am using the built in nic an PCI AMD card. I can not seem to change the card to full-duplex using ifconfig or the built in sysinstall. I noticed there appeared to be other problems with IBM machines. My ? is this a recognized problem or something new? My ser

Re: sshd behaviour

On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 10:00:44AM -0600, Nathan Kinkade wrote: " " As another poster mentioned, the problem is likely related to DNS, and I " have experienced it as well. If you are using Privilege Separation, " then an sshd process will chroot itself into /var/empty before " performing authenti

Install squirrelmail

Hello I want to install squirrelmail from ports (cvsuped today). Make runs without problems but after make install the following error occurs: Build complete. (It is safe to ignore warnings about tempnam and tmpnam). ===> Installing for php4-4.3.10_2 ===> php4-4.3.10_2 depends on file: /usr/

Re: Illogical usage of swap

> > On Mar 16 at 09:47, Jerry McAllister commented: > > >> > >> "Colin J. Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> On Mar 16 at 07:29, Lowell Gilbert launched this into the bitstream: > >> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#TOP-FREEMEM > >>> > >>> Hmm, yeah

Where does FreeBSD install the Qt directory?

Trying to compile mysqlcc from source (ports didn't work) and it says install a version of Qt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/X11R6/include] > pkg_info | grep qt qt-3.3.3_2 Multiplatform C++ application framework [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/X11R6/include] > So that should mean I have qt installed r

Re: umass0 -- yes, daX -- no?

> In the last episode (Mar 15), Mikhail Teterin said: > > I'm trying to access the file system on a usb memory key. When I > > insert it, however, kernel duly reports creation of umass0, but not > > the da1 (da0 is my ZIP drive). > > > > According to usbdevs -d, I have: > > > > addr 1: OHCI roo

Re: Appletalk/Samba?

Are you using MacOS X or MacOS classic? MacOS X comes with SAMBA software native which means Macintosh and Windows clients can share Windows volumes natively. How does this sound? -Adam On Mar 16, 2005, at 6:09 AM, Tim Simmons wrote: Is it possible to set up a FreeBSD server to act as a gateway

Re: mozilla port issues

On Wednesday 16 March 2005 08:22 am, Ben Munat wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Until the upgrade is done you should set > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="YES" in your make file. portmanager will > > be able to do the upgrade, but when it can't upgrade one port like > > mozilla it won't upgrade any

Re: mozilla port issues

On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:22:12 -0800, Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > Until the upgrade is done you should set > > DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="YES" in your make file. portmanager will be > > able to do the upgrade, but when it can't upgrade one port like mozilla >

Re: mozilla port issues

Michael C. Shultz wrote: Until the upgrade is done you should set DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES="YES" in your make file. portmanager will be able to do the upgrade, but when it can't upgrade one port like mozilla it won't upgrade anything that depends on mozilla either. Ok, I'll give that a shot... bu

  1   2   >