conclude it is releated to the re driver.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
the system filesystems with zfs
snapshot/send/receive commands, recreate the pool and then restore the
system filesystems from the backup
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
a chance to run.
(Side note: On FreeBSD, I believe only high priority threads will run
when you yield(). As a workaround, I think you have to lower the
thread's priority before yield() and then raise it again afterwards.)
- Andrew
___
freebs
ng at 100) solves the problem
with aone-line patch. Call me biased but this is what I prefer :-)
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
under FreeBSD 6 and 7, and are very
fast.
I haven't tried their SAS cards personally but I understand that it is
equally good.
FWIW, I have had bad experiences with Areca.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
ered
making a patch. At least my patch is only one line, and solves 90% of
the problem, and still no one can be bothered committing it.
Maybe we should apply my patch for now, until someone works on the rest.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.o
It seems to be very reliable and fast, but you have to use "prefer" to
get good performance, I only write across the network and not read.
Load and round-robin lead to slow reads during periods of heavy writes.
Hope that helps,
- Andrew
___
week before this.
Any hints appreciated,
- Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
100 51012 46.6 103153 38.0 27272 7.4 116210 98.7 989831 99.3 72496.6 183.3
--
Best regards
Mr Andrew L. Davydov
+7 985 773 8819
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
, OpenOffice.org will work fine, and lm_sensors
MIGHT, but it is not guaranteed to.
As of any major version upgrade of FreeBSD. :)
--
Yours
Andrew Kolchoogin.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Ivan Voras wrote:
Andrew N. Below wrote:
Hi all,
freebsd box connected to Eonstor RAID with 5-6 exported
partitions (each one has ~950Gb size, fs is UFS2)
every night we have a lot of running rsyncs (rsnapshots)
on these partitions
this happens 2-4 times per month
db
ELF32
arguments: /usr/local/bin/rsync
threads: 1
100178 Run CPU 2 rsync
what is exactly wrong?
--
WBR,
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sta
e. Use comms/mgetty+sendfax mgetty
instead -- to be precise, mgetty also can be used with UNIX tty
semantics (see description of configuration keyword "blocking"), but
just don't do it. ;)
--
Andrew Kolchoogin.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cause these sorts of
problems.
--
-
Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..."
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (pref) | Snail: PO Box 370
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (alt) |Bel
non-zero value into the particular
memory that was being returned and tested in that instance. An
entertaining debugging experience...
Patches to drscheme have been accepted up-stream, so all should be
dandy very soon.
Cheers,
Andrew
___
nstance.
I'll feed the patches (I've also made some tweaks to ensure that
it all compiles with -Werror-implicit-function-declaration,
because that's usually a good source of breakage on 64-bit
systems) up-stream, and see what happens. I'll add the new
patches to the port PR, too.
ump
forward to -STABLE again and rebuild at least all of mred's
dependencies, but that's going to be a slow process...
Reckon I'll give that a go. No point staying in the past, now
that we know where abouts the breakage occurred.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
__
/local/lib/libmzscheme3m-372.so
(0x800638000)
libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x800a07000)
libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x800b21000)
libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800d1a000)
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
with
shm mappings. I looked at it, but it didn't look as though it
would affect this.
If anyone has suggestions about what I could
investigate/change/poke next, I'd appreciate it.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing li
commands, I
get an uncompressed file of 1024 zero bytes. Should that happen?
In both cases, tar tvf{,z} doesn't whinge about unrecognized
formats.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
t. Make sure you get the section of output from
when you kick off wpa_supplicant and when the firmware error happens.
cheers,
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ore these settings.
>
> Any pointers?
As far as I can understand, it was done intentionally. No "jailed"
setting is stored in ZFS structures, and personally for me it was easier
to write script that jails ZFS file systems needed for particular jail
during startup time.
c. Accuracy in dependant port installations
8
>d. Internal record keeping
4 (this is only a performance issue)
>e. Granularity's of the port management system
mu (without having seen the discussion, I don't understand the question.)
> 12. Please rate your personal tec
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:50:24AM -0800, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> Another fun one to grep for is " teh" or "teh ".
grep -w teh
:)
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send a
borked in install_unschg(),
chflags noschg ${BASEDIR}/${F} || return 1
Is there any way to test the underlying filesystem supports flags first?
cheers,
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
В Пт, 16/11/2007 в 09:16 +0100, Kris Kennaway пишет:
> Check the archives, this comes up a lot (you need to increase the amount
> of memory allocated to the kernel).
Already did.
The question actually is how much memory I should allocate for
kernel (exactly, what numbers should be placed
Dear colleagues,
do you have any suggestions about how I should trace what condition
generates kernel panic with reason "kmem_map too small"?
Operating system is FreeBSD 6.2-p8, no unusual software runs on this
machine -- it runs Asterisk with dummy Zapata driver, FreeRADIUS v1.1.7,
MySQL
u will automatically export ZFS pool with root file
system on it?-)
--
Yours
Andrew Kolchoogin.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
rtainly xorg, firefox (and epiphany, which I prefer) and MUA
(thunderbird, evolution, mutt, claws-mail(my pref.)) all work
happily in amd64 mode.
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 02:14:47PM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 01:43 PM 10/31/2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> >> I'd also be interested in seeing the latest version of
> >> bridge(4) brought in.
> >
> >Its fully up to date in RELENG_6 except for
Its fully up to date in RELENG_6 except for the vlan trunking support
which I dont plan to merge. Was there something in particular or was it
just the vlan code?
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
- Original Message
From: Andrew Birukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 10:34:56 PM
Subject: Re: pf broken in 7.0-BETA1 ?
Ermal Luçi
Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 04:34:56PM -0300, Andrew Birukov wrote:
Ermal Luçi wrote:
Try using
pass out on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any tos 0x10 no keep state queue
ssh
and it should work as you expect!
pf.conf
g pf.
/etc/pf.conf:10: syntax error
pfctl: Syntax error in config file: pf rules not loaded
pf enabled
Unfortunately syntax error...
--
Andrew Biriukov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
erly.
My configuration:
# uname -a
FreeBSD amb.kiev.ua 7.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA1 #1: Sun Oct 28 10:08:13
ADT 2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AMB.7.0 i386
dmesg output and kernel config file are attached to this letter.
Last time I cvsupped RELENG_7 and reinstall world in t
Thbbt! I'm reading the catman version of MAKEDEV. Wish I could disable
that "feature". Oh well. I'll delete it all and rebuild it again if
needed. Thanks!
Andrew Lankford
Danny Braniss wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:37:45PM -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Thanks fo
Danny Braniss wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:37:45PM -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Thanks for replying, but once again I've miscommunicated the issue. I
meant that MAKEDEV.8 is in /usr/src/share/man/man8/, and the
modification time is Oct 13th, recent, which suggests to me that it&#x
Thanks for replying, but once again I've miscommunicated the issue. I
meant that MAKEDEV.8 is in /usr/src/share/man/man8/, and the
modification time is Oct 13th, recent, which suggests to me that it's
still in the 7.0-BETA1 cvs tree.
Andrew Lankford
Doug Barton wrote:
On Sun, 2
I just noticed that /usr/share/man/man8/MAKEDEV.8 is still in the
FreeBSD-7 tree. Is this intentional? It still says that MAKEDEV is
located in /dev and mentions MAKEDEV.local as well.
Just wondering.
Andrew Lankford
___
freebsd-stable
nterface above 1500 and on vlan interface
> above lagg's MTU -4 .
> also i've increased MTU on both ems to 9000 and after that i still can't
> increase MTU on lagg interface above 1500
> please, HELP ...
Please test this attached
ected
> on them. I alos notice that I am now only seeing packets destined for the
> appropriate machine comming out of my switch. Before the patch I could see
> all the packets for all machine using tcpdup.
Great, thanks for testing.
Andrew
___
fr
the correct MAC.
Most people didnt see a problem which is why this slipped through.
tcpdump on another host with the -e flag and see what the src mac is.
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 03:15:17AM +0400, Alexey Karagodov wrote:
> is there any progress?
> just one "me too"
>
> this problem appeared for me when i try to use vlan over lagg ( to em NICs
> )
lagg on RELENG_6 is currently broken due to subtle differences that
wernt taken into account when it wa
etup, where
only one client behind the NAT firewall could run the VPN client
at a time, because the VPN protocol used a fixed port and UDP.
Maybe my NAT rules need more sophistication? I don't pay all
that much attention to it...)
Cheers,
--
Andrew
_
that mean that it somehow *is* disabled?
Any other thoughts on how to improve my situation?
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 10:48:31PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I csup /usr/src to patch my sysem per on
> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:05.libarchive.asc
>
> bscause freebsd-update faild.
>
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors fou
UHL lo0
@@ -23,3 +22,4 @@
ff02::%fxp0/32link#1UC fxp0
ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC lo0
ff02::%gif0/32link#6UC gif0
0:05:5d:71:8d:b8
media: Ethernet autoselect
status: active
lagg: laggproto lacp
laggport ste3 =1c
laggport ste2 =1c
laggport ste1 =1c
laggport ste0 =1c
And all ports here are ACTIVE. I have been meaning to ad
dump.
=
The source code has been received today(2007-06-26), with a RELENG_6 tag
With best regards
Andrew M.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 10/25/06, Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am 25.10.2006 um 10:57 schrieb Stefan Bethke:
> I'm not sure that would be so easy. However, CONSPEED is/was the
> setting to be used if the actual setting cannot be determined when
> sio initializes.
The code is there to determine the curre
On 5/1/07, Sam Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone, just thought I'd say hello, new to the list. Hope I can help
with some problems; and if I have any, I hope you guys can help me. :D
Welcome!
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
On 4/22/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I've upgraded one of my servers today.
>> Now it is
>> Asus P5p800-VM
>> Pentium D 3.0Ghz
&g
On 4/21/07, Artem Kuchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I've upgraded one of my servers today.
Now it is
Asus P5p800-VM
Pentium D 3.0Ghz
4GB RAM (4x1 GB)
3WARE raid5
FreebSD 6.2 cvsed today compiled from sources.
after that i decided to try PAE. It runs just fine but
when i compare availabl
4.30 (B16038)
| UCLI | (C) Adaptec 2003-2006
| UCLI | All Rights Reserved
But of course it is unreal to get source code...
--
Andrew
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Wow. Somehow we've slipped through a one-year timewarp:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 07:47:54AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 March 2006 07:40, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> >
> > After the last rebuild on my amd64-x2 box, both the nve ethernet
> > on the motherboard and
I have opened a:
"KDE Kontrol Center" => "Peripherials" => "Storage Media" => "A
certain action" => "Propertias"
and have almost simultaneously pressed the button "eject" on a DVD-drive
- that has led to crash of system.
How next time to avoid crash of system at ejection of a DVD-disk?
===
rg/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=110892
And you have not found out the answer?
Regards,
Andrew R.Muhametshin
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 03:30:45PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 09:37:09AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:33:27PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > > In the midst of the madness, I found that when doing either of the
> &
P_TXCSUM, which is disabled when the interface is
bridged. If you manually toggle this with ifconfig do you get the same
result?
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
: power control of
the monitor from screen-saver, and ability to drive my display
at its rated 1600x1200 resolution (logs claim that it's
restricted to 1280x1024 by BIOS, whatever that means...)
I don't think that the vesa driver can do either
to have a reputation for goodness (I used to have a
G400 or the like), but it's been a long time...
(I'm currently using a lowish-end NVidia card under the x.org nv
driver, but it has issues (of which no 3D accel is but one...)
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
ect carrier, which means that the base system
still doesn't include those bits...
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
be it isn't installed or configured properly. The
config script is installed by the port, and it's pretty nicely
commented.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
de?
>
> Has anyone answered this yet? I do not know myself.
Nope. All silence.
Ports gurus?
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:41:00AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Andrew Reilly wrote:
> >Funny thing happened after the last upgrade (upgraded to
> >6-STABLE yesterday): the moinmoin wiki that I've been
> >playing with stopped working
httpd.conf file that talks about PATH.
Any thoughts?
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello.
Does anybody knows what happens with anoncvs1.freebsd.org?
I couldn't connect since 2007-02-10:
ssh: connect to host anoncvs1.freebsd.org port 22: Operation timed out
cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if
any)
--
Andrew N. Below
Zenon
>> macmini
>>
>> 2007/2/18, Bleeding Edge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm looking for a recommendation on a small form factor system. I've
>>> looked at some of the models from AOpen , Shuttle and Microstar. I'd
>>> like an AMD 64 (or dual core) box (lower cost) with S
> macmini
>
> 2007/2/18, Bleeding Edge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I'm looking for a recommendation on a small form factor system. I've
>> looked at some of the models from AOpen , Shuttle and Microstar. I'd
>> like an AMD 64 (or dual core) box (lower cost) with SATA/EIDE disk
>> sup
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:24:14AM +, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2007, Andrew Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >I have a patch here to MFC the rstp code to RELENG_6. It should be all
> >fine and dandy as for API but will cause the default spanning tree
> >
still default to stp and
require the OP to enable rstp.
Any opinions?
Andrew
http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/mfc_rstp.diff
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any
On 1/18/07, Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A poll for opinions if I may?
>>
>> I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
>> pair up t
On 1/17/07, Matthew X. Economou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apart from potentially avoiding a whole disk from being copied
> during a resync after a crash, are there any other advantages to
> using partition level mirroring instead of drive level mirroring?
Joe,
Partition-level software RAID p
On 1/17/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A poll for opinions if I may?
I've got a few gmirrors running on various machines, all of which
pair up two drives at the physical level (i.e. mirror /dev/ad0s1
with /dev/ad1s1). Of course there are other ways of doing it to,
like mirrorin
On 1/15/07, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
I also getting strange errors like Jan 15 12:20:58 boris kernel: afd0:
FAILURE - PREVENT_ALLOW ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=0x24
ascq=0x00
P.S. How You get 12Mb/s? With my flash
Jan 15 12:20:58 boris kernel: da0:
Removable Direct Acc
On 1/16/07, Stefan Lambrev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 1/15/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm purchasing a new server, and was wondering what anyone thought about
>> whether to pay extra for the SAS5IR card so I
On 1/15/07, Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm purchasing a new server, and was wondering what anyone thought about
whether to pay extra for the SAS5IR card so I can RAID0 the two drives,
or whether to just rely on gmirror. My worry about the former is that I
can't seem to find mana
On 1/15/07, Boris Kovalenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!
Is this ok that atausb is not shown in NOTES and LINT? Even I see no
module atausb.ko after kernel recompilation.
Right, somebody has been carefully hiding this feature
from us. I've just tried it - and... it works. No
performance b
of the network arping for the rl0 address would
cause the arp reply to also be sent to laptop1 (with rl0's address),
hence the logged 'address moved' warnings.
Some people pointed out that the address should be assigned to the
bridge interface whic
Hello.
- Original Message -
From: "Rong-en Fan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Andrew N. Below" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: 11 января 2007 г. 20:02
Subject: Re: using md-mounted ISO as NFS root for PXE booting and installing
> [...]
> > All
192.168.13.1:/mnt/netboot on / (nfs)
devfs on /dev (devfs, local)
/dev/md1 on /var (ufs, local)
/dev/md2 on /tmp (ufs, local)
and I can see just another "Amnesiac" system w/o root password etc.
Where is my mistake?
I attached dmesg output for 6.2-RC2 boot to this letter.
--
Andrew
th the current
controller software.
Latest Adaptec drivers released at 25 Oct 2006, aaccli says "Copyright
1998-2002"...
Maybe someone already tried to contact Adaptec?
--
Andrew N. Below
Zenon N.S.P.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailin
has existed.
The work-around that I used was to configure amd to do the mount
(as root) on behalf of the user in question (me, at that time).
These days I use smbclient or GNOMEVFS/nautilus instead, but they
achieve somewhat different things...
Cheers,
On 12/11/06, Greg Eden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I recently updated two production servers from 5.3 to 6.1 via cvsup
and buildworld. Since the upgrade I've seen an increase in the number
of Input packet errors reported on the bge cards in on both boxes.
One is a HP DL360g3, the other is a HP DL3
good
idea...
> prevent applications from using that byte of memory.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
es not exhibit this behavior, the route never gets
> flushed.
Linkstate handling is known to be broken in wi(4) which dhclient relies
on, you may just have to use isc-dhclient.
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.free
FreeBSD"
>
Have you set the bootloader to use serial? Set -h in /boot.config
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
. The very last one doesn't seem to have
been touched since Jul 2005, which is plausibly when I formatted
it. Neither does it list any inodes used. Is this normal
behaviour or a sign of something ill?
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 10:05:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Andrew Reilly wrote:
>
> >So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
> >work, and care is required.
>
> That's always true, but worth a reminder nonetheless. :)
>
> >[*
ernel.
So: my two cents: it can work, but it's possible for it not to
work, and care is required.
[*] The production server is using a software RAID mirror on
a pair of SATA drives on a low-end Intel P4/ICH6 motherboard,
using ar(4), configured by atacontrol. Fsck on 6.x can't find
any s
is on an nForce 4/AMD64-X2 system.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
--
Andrew
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ip=0x005210de rev=0xa2
hdr=0x00
# pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x20
1c01
# pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x24
1c41
# pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x50
1c01
# pciconf -r pci0:1:1 0x54
1c41
--
Andrew Degtiariov
DA-RIPE
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
er.
I attached iwi debug output.
--
Andrew N. Below
Zenon N.S.P., http://www.zenon.net
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hi again,
I attached gzipped debug output of iwi driver with
all channels scan (interface settings in rc.conf
includes only "WPA" string).
9 minutes from start to associated state. :(
--
Andrew N. Below
Zenon N.S.P.
iwi-debug-all-channels.txt.gz
Description: B
ou should
> set "sysctl debug.iwi=5" and check console output for problems. Let me
> know how it goes.
OK, I'll do these tests ASAP.
As you can see in my previous reply, I got successfull connection,
but still have strange things while reconnecting, and someti
t.conf and run
/etc/rc.d/netif.
Then I drop connection (netif stop iwi0) and tried to start it again.
I got "associated" state in 5-6 minutes.
In rc.conf I have:
ifconfig_iwi0="ssid MY-SSID channel 11 WPA
How can I get "-dd" output from wpa_supplicant started with netif
frames with a bad CRC receive" with the iwicontrol utility.
On another FreeBSD box with 6.1-release and same version of wpa_supplicant,
but with another USB wireless device (ural) all works fine.
Wireless connection in winxp on this laptop works fine too.
Any ideas?
--
Andrew N. Below
Zenon
t; >
> > >You don't appear to be using the em driver. Can you confirm?
> > >
> > >Kris
> >
> > positive.
>
> It's probably a nve driver bug then, you should talk to the driver
> author. This may not be fixable in FreeBSD since it'
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006, Karl Denninger wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 05:04:41PM -0400, Bob Johnson wrote:
> > I have used USB-to-serial converters with no problem. All the control
> > signals (at least the ones my applications need) seem to work
> > correctly. I don't remember any brands or models
change Fedora Core 4 linux_base to Red Hat 9 linux_base.
"ls" doesn't dump core
anymore, but 'java' doesn't work.
6.1-R-p7 works just fine.
Somebody has broken Linuxuliator?-) Or I've broken my notebook?
--
Yours
Andrew Kolchioogin.
P.S. R
201 - 300 of 541 matches
Mail list logo
