-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 Jan 2007, at 20:09, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Additionally, i could not find a way to make the flash plugin
work, which is a major annoyance given the amount of flash content
that one finds in the services i use daily (some work related too).
You
On 2007-01-17, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> > Personally I like tabbed browsing a lot, but different strokes for
> > different folks.
>
> It probably depends on your window manager. Tabs are a reasonable
> workaround for windo
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 3:16:44 +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:37:53AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
>> I can't agree. It has hijacked some keys used by Wikipedia (alt-S,
>> alt-P), and so far I've found it impossible to disable tabs, something
>> that was
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:37:53AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
> I can't agree. It has hijacked some keys used by Wikipedia (alt-S,
> alt-P), and so far I've found it impossible to disable tabs, something
> that was barely possible under 1.5. Tell me how to fix that and I'll
> be margina
On Wednesday, 17 January 2007 at 9:56:51 +1000, Greg Black wrote:
> On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
>> exhibits severe problems.
>
> I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
> 1.5.x version had been replace
On 2007-01-16, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
> exhibits severe problems.
I was surprised and annoyed when I found that the reasonably reliable
1.5.x version had been replaced by 2.0, partly because I expected it to
be less reliable and partly because
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:07:39PM +, Pete French wrote:
> > If you had any idea how many RFC's IE violates and and how many bugs there
> > are in it you would never have made a statement like that.
>
> I don't think here ever said that IE was *better*, just that it was
> necessary for certai
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:41:22PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 1/16/07, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So i am just advocating to keep the "stable" version around while
> > the "current" one becomes stable enough.
>
> You can get that port back to a specific date (e.g. with
>
Hello,
linux-firefox-2.0.0.1 works fine for me. Cheers, -vlado
vlado.srv# uname -a
FreeBSD srv.g1.netng.org 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1: Fri
Nov 3 20:20:33 CET 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usrmnt/src/sys/SRV i386
vlado.srv# ll /var/db/pkg/ | grep firefox
drwxr-xr-x 2 root
On 1/16/07, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So i am just advocating to keep the "stable" version around while
the "current" one becomes stable enough.
You can get that port back to a specific date (e.g. with
sysutils/portdowngrade) and reinstall the version which better applies
your nee
as
the IE only sites (which are becomming rare). In the end I bundle any such jobs
up and do them at home where I keep an x64-XP box for such things. If the
most stable flash enabled player on FreeBSD is linux-firefox 1.5 then it
would be nice to hav
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:14:41PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
...
> If linux-firefox isn't working for youhere, I really don't have any
The 1.5.x version _is_ working for me. It is 2.0.x that
exhibits severe problems.
My complaint (to get back on the topic) is that 1.5 disappe
use daily (some work related too).
If linux-firefox isn't working for youhere, I really don't have any
good suggestions. I would prefer that a stable, working flash plugin
for native firefox, which would install with a simple portinstall.
A man can dream, can't he?
> firefox i
ssage -
From: "Luigi Rizzo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Torfinn Ingolfsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: can we resurrect linux-firefox-1.5 ?
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
On Tue, 1
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 07:37:22PM +0100, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:06:45 -0800
> Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Would it be possible to resurrect the linux-firefox 1.5
> > port (under a separate name) so at least people have a choi
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 01:06:45 -0800
Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to resurrect the linux-firefox 1.5
> port (under a separate name) so at least people have a choice
> on which set of bugs they prefer ?
What makes native firefox unsuitable for y
[sorry if i don't post this to -ports, but i feel
that this is really a -stable issue as it affects
one widely used port]
I am not sure if i am the only one, but on RELENG_6,
linux-firefox 2 is basically unusable (see details below),
while linux-firefox 1.5 is at least usable (even though
i
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Minette Pamela wrote:
Ppass on Q1 .. what Vladimir said.
> Now, maybe is somehow related to the errors I always get when I try
> to download files or open files from the linux-firefox browser like :
> "/tmp/, could not be saved, because you cannot change the
Install flash plugin from the port. "cd /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin7
& make install".
In firefox options change the default download directory to where you can
write.
HTH,-vlado
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Minette Pamela wrote:
hi, i got this problem with linux-firefox.
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 19:31:59 -0800 (PST) Minette Pamela wrote:
> hi, i got this problem with linux-firefox. I Installed it before in my
> KDE in FreeBSD with no problems and been able to use flash
> plugins. Then, I changed to Gnome recently and installed
> linux-firefox. Now, whe
hi, i got this problem with linux-firefox. I Installed it before in my KDE in
FreeBSD with no problems and been able to use flash plugins. Then, I changed to
Gnome recently and installed linux-firefox. Now, when I tried to install
plugins by clicking on a site with a plugin requirement, I was
On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 16:36:40 +0800 bin wan wrote:
> wan# linux-firefox
> /usr/local/lib/linux-firefox/firefox-bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
You may consider reading /usr/ports/UPDATING "20060616: AFFECTS user
On Sunday 22 October 2006 11:36, bin wan wrote:
> > /usr/local/lib/linux-firefox/firefox-bin: error while loading shared
> > libraries: /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
>
> It seems firefox-bin is trying to use the freebsd's native libgtk. You need
>
On Sunday 22 October 2006 11:36, bin wan wrote:
> /usr/local/lib/linux-firefox/firefox-bin: error while loading shared
> libraries: /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0: ELF file OS ABI invalid
It seems firefox-bin is trying to use the freebsd's native libgtk. You need to
install linux-gtk2
On Sunday 22 October 2006 11:36, bin wan wrote:
> I used firefox based on FreeBSD perviously. but it wasn't able to run
> plugin of flash player. because flash player has only Linux version.
Hi,
native firefox works well ( read usable ) with linux-flashplugin and
linuxpluginwrapper. I have writ
Hi,
there is some problem in your linux-firefox installation. The firefox
binary is:
vlado.srv# ll /usr/local/bin/linux-firefox
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 57 15 říj 19:15 /usr/local/bin/linux-firefox
vlado.srv# brandelf /usr/local/bin/linux-firefox
brandelf: file '/usr/local/bin/linux-fi
I used firefox based on FreeBSD perviously. but it wasn't able to run plugin
of flash player. because flash player has only Linux version. so I installed
linux-firefox by ports. Install is no error. However when the linux-firefox
actually run , I get
wan# linux-firefox
/usr/local/lib/
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 12:00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiho! :-)
>
> When trying to start linux-firefox on:
>
> FreeBSD greatsheep 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #5: Tue May 2
> 20:33:32 CEST
> 2006 [EMAIL PROTEC
Hiho! :-)
When trying to start linux-firefox on:
FreeBSD greatsheep 6.1-RC FreeBSD 6.1-RC #5: Tue May 2 20:33:32 CEST
2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SUBMARINE_SMP i386
it complains about:
/usr/X11R6/lib/linux-firefox/firefox-bin: error while loading shared
libraries: /usr
29 matches
Mail list logo
