I've recently acquired an AMD64 box (dual Opteron 242, SiS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=484).
See below for more details). I find it very unstable running with 8
GB memory, though 4 GB are not a problem. At first I thought
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box (dual Opteron 242, SiS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=484).
See below for more details). I find it very unstable running with 8
GB memory, though 4 GB are not a p
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory. About the only
> strangeness, which seems to come from the BIOS, is that it recognizes
> only 3.5 GB. If I put all DIMMS in, it recognizes the full 8 GB
> memory.
>
> I rea
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> I've recently acquired an AMD64 box ...
>>
>> What's unstable? ... The amd64 5.4-PRERELEASE kernel just
>> hangs/freezes.
>
> 5.3-RELEASE has a lot of problems with >4GB due to busdma issues.
> Those s
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory. About the only
>> strangeness, which seems to come from the BIOS, is that it recognizes
>> only 3.5 GB.
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
>>
>> Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> You could try http://www.memtest86.com although that doesn't do >4Gb
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:24, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> I'm pretty sure it's not the memory. I've tried each pair
> individually, and it's only when they're both in there together that
> it's a problem. And yes, I've tried them in each pair of slots.
Could be a marginal timing issue.. You could
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>I'm pretty sure it's not the memory. I've tried each pair
>individually, and it's only when they're both in there together that
>it's a problem. And yes, I've tried them in each pair of slots.
I'm sure you have checked this aswell but just for completeness,
they aren
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 5:54:17 +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> I'm pretty sure it's not the memory. I've tried each pair
>> individually, and it's only when they're both in there together that
>> it's a problem. And yes, I've tried them in each pair of slot
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic1: LINT1 polarity: high
-ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
+ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard
cpu0 BSP:
ID: 0x00
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
>>> lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
>>> lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
>>> lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge
>>> lapic1: LINT1 polarity: high
>>> -ioap
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic1: LINT1 polarity: high
-ioapi
[gratuitous empty lines removed]
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
> lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic0: LI
Jon Noack wrote:
On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 22:27:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Jon Noack wrote:
>> On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin
On 03/30/05 23:49, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 22:27:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Jon Noack wrote:
On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 0:00:22 -0600, Jon Noack wrote:
> On 03/30/05 23:49, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> Here's the complete output of acpidump -t, anyway:
>>
>>
>>
>> Since I don't know anything about ACPI, this doesn't say too much to
>> me. Suggestions welcome. If the APIC section is
Hi,
Since we are discussing AMD64 with 8GB RAM, I also would like to point my
problem.
I'm still looking for possibility to run FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE with more than
4GB RAM
on Dual amd64 2.2GHz machine (IBM @server 325) with ServeRAID 6M (ips driver)).
Right now I'm using only 4GB RAM and this serv
Ganbold wrote:
Hi,
Since we are discussing AMD64 with 8GB RAM, I also would like to point my
problem.
I'm still looking for possibility to run FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE with more
than 4GB RAM
on Dual amd64 2.2GHz machine (IBM @server 325) with ServeRAID 6M (ips
driver)).
Right now I'm using only 4GB RAM
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 09:49 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 22:27:43 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > Jon Noack wrote:
> >> On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehe
On Mar 31, 2005, at 1:00 AM, Jon Noack wrote:
My limited research (as in, Google) shows that the MADT was defined as
part of ACPI 2.0:
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/64bit/IA64_ACPI.mspx
According to your previous link the motherboard specs, it supports
both ACPI 1.0A and 2.0. Pe
On Mar 30, 2005, at 11:08 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
lapic0: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic0: LINT1 polarity: high
lapic1: Routing NMI -> LINT1
lapic1: LINT1 trigger: edge
lapic
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:49 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
This may be the case, but between man page and output some terminology
must have changed. I can't see any reference to anything like an MADT
there. Does that mean that there isn't one, or that ACPI can't find
it, or does the section APIC re
On Mar 31, 2005, at 12:27 AM, Scott Long wrote:
Jon Noack wrote:
On 03/30/05 23:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 21:28:36 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 23:01:03 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Mar 30, 2005, at 8:54 PM,
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 03:25:37PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Greg: The busdma problems from 5.3-RELEASE are fixed. That doesn't
> mean that there are no *other* problems. Scott is saying "the old
> busdma bug shouldn't be affecting 5.4-PRE", and he's correct.
>
> Most likely, something else
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > I had 4 bad out of 12 tested where the DIMMs were Crucial PC2700 2GB
> > Reg. ECC DIMMs.
>
> OK, this makes sense. It might also explain why the 4 GB
> configuration only recognizes 3.5 GB.
No. This is due to the 3.5-4.0GB
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:32:33AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >
> > Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> You could try http://www.memtest86.com although that doesn't do >4G
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:24:29AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >>> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >>
> >> Heh. Difficult when the system doesn'
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:12:35 +0900
> From: Ganbold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Problems with AMD64 and 8 GB RAM?
>
> Hi,
>
> Since we are discussing AMD64 with 8GB RAM, I also would like to point my
> problem.
>
> I'm still looking for possib
On Mar 31, 2005, at 3:08 PM, Alan Jay wrote:
We did some tests with the latest 5.3-STABLE / 5.4-PRERELEASE and
still found
the same issues when using a mySQL database heavily hit over the
Ethernet
controller. Our final tests limited the memory on boot-up to 4Gb and
the bug
is still there so we
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box (dual Opteron 242, SiS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=484).
See below for more details). I find it very unstable running with 8
GB memory, though 4 GB are not a p
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box (dual Opteron 242, SiS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
motherboard
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/server/svr/pro_svr_detail.php?UID=484).
See below for more details). I find it very unstable running with 8
GB memory, though 4 GB are not a p
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
> I'm sorry to come into this discussion after 58 messages, but this board
> has been extensively discussed about 1 year ago, because it gave me trouble
> to no end (even with 2Gb). One of the early amd64 developers (not David o
David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:33:05AM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'm sorry to come into this discussion after 58 messages, but this board
has been extensively discussed about 1 year ago, because it gave me trouble
to no end (even with 2Gb). One of the early amd64 develope
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >> None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory. About the only
> >> strangenes
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory. About the only
strangeness, which seems to come from the BIOS, is that it recognize
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box ...
What's unstable? ... The amd64 5.4-PRERELEASE kernel just
hangs/freezes.
5.3-RELEASE has a lot of problems with >4GB due to busdma issues.
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box ...
What's unstable? ... The amd64 5.4-PRERELEA
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:01:14 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>>
None of these problems occur when I use 4 GB memory
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:57:15 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:14:45AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
None of these p
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:15 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:01:14 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehe
.. Original Message ...
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14:45 +0930 "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
>
>Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
There is a bootable ISO version of memtest86 that you could try.
- ask
--
htt
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:01:14 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 14:35:46 -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 07:54:39AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
None of these problems occur when I use 4 G
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
I've recently acquired an AMD64 box ...
What's unstable? ... The amd64 5.4-PRERELEASE
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:09 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> > Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:30:37 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> I've recently acquired an A
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:22 pm, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> .. Original Message ...
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14:45 +0930 "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> >> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >
> >Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> Ther
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've booted with the other 2 DIMMs now (I have 4 2 GB DIMMs, all the
: MB will hold). No problems. See my last reply to Scott: I'm
: wondering if the system is ignoring the PCI hole.
Unlikely. If it
[Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
[gratuitous empty lines removed]
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:23:34 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>>
On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 15:25:37 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:09 pm, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 30 March 2005 at 16:04:44 -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>>> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
As I described, it doesn't appear to be the drivers.
>>>
>>> I d
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
>
> Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
You could try http://www.memtest86.com although that doesn't do >4Gb :(
--
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:32:33AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> >
> > Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
>
> You could try http://www.memtest86.com although that doesn't do >4G
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:40, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:32:33AM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> > > > Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> > >
> > > Heh. Difficult when the system doesn't run.
> >
> > You coul
On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:59:02 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:24:29AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> On Thursday, 31 March 2005 at 10:32:33 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> Have you run sysutils/mem
This may not be related at all, but I've been following this thread and at
certain times I wanted to drop in and stress that things like pci express
cards should be re-inserted after the RAM has been (re)inserted. Perhaps the
BIOSes are really that stupid that they only rely on memory adresses
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:09:11AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> The moral of the story is, I suppose, "don't buy the MSI K8T
> Master2-FAR". I was warned about the motherboard before I bought it,
WHY?? There is nothing wrong with that motherboard -- I have three of
them. You are at fault
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:04 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> The MSI K8T Master2-FAR works fine with 1GB DIMM's. Where on MSI's
> website did they state 2GB double-stacked DIMM's were supported?
I haven't been following the discussion, but if we're talking about the
MSI K8T Master2-FAR, one can read
On Friday, 8 April 2005 at 13:04:18 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:09:11AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>> The moral of the story is, I suppose, "don't buy the MSI K8T
>> Master2-FAR". I was warned about the motherboard before I bought it,
>
> WHY?? There is nothin
On Mar 30, "Peter Wemm" wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 March 2005 03:22 pm, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> > .. Original Message ...
> > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:14:45 +0930 "Greg 'groggy' Lehey"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> > >> Have you run sysutils/memtest86 with the 8 GB?
> > >
> > >Heh
59 matches
Mail list logo
