My god, do you guys listen to your stereo equipment, or the music coming
out of the speakers? :)
Geert Decorte wrote:
I think a few people need to get into high fidelity audio.
To be clear : cable is cable, it's just a piece of metal.( Some people
claims they can hear the difference be
> I think a few people need to get into high fidelity audio.
>
>> To be clear : cable is cable, it's just a piece of metal.( Some people
>> claims they can hear the difference between a gold and a copper cable,
>> come on, let's be serious)
>
> Seriousely, ALL cables have a sonic signature. Si
> I personally will rarely spend more than 10% of
> what I paye dfor the equipment on the cables. Means cheap equpment
> gets cheap cables expensive equipment gets good quality cables.
10% is a good rule of thumb. Good cables (especially loudspeaker cables)
can easily give 10% better sound. M
I tend to agree with Andrew, I used to setup concert rigs a lot.
Cabling can make alot of difference but not for the "market hype"
reasons. If I have gold connectors on my equipmen tI like to have gold
on the cables, Why? Cleaner connection, not fancy magic, cleaner
connctions mean cleaner signal.
I think a few people need to get into high fidelity audio.
> To be clear : cable is cable, it's just a piece of metal.( Some people
> claims they can hear the difference between a gold and a copper cable,
> come on, let's be serious)
Seriousely, ALL cables have a sonic signature. Silver is,
I do agree using gold cables is a joke.
But gold doesn't oxidate as well, thats one of the benefits.
Most contact problems of cabling are real mechanical problems combined
with oxidation.
Oxidation would make the resistance higher and therefore the quality of
a signal lower. In coax, higher res
I don't believe in ultra-quality cables, and seeing some made with gold,
men ! that's a real joke !
To be clear : cable is cable, it's just a piece of metal.( Some people
claims they can hear the difference between a gold and a copper cable,
come on, let's be serious)
BUT cables are build in
Hi,
having a public gallery of systems where everyone can sent a small number of
picture (e.g. up to 10) would give Freevo a big boost as people will see what
systems using Freevo can look like.
Stephan
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 21:31, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> Can we not get a public gallery on fr
Actually, I'm thinking already some time to create a small subproject.
A small captured film showing a freevo box working, switching TV, DVD,
radio, pictures.
A kind of commercial. Of course something thats viewable from a freevobox ;)
Can be used by others writing about freevo with a link.
You ne
I'm still working on my newest Freevo box
http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=879944
I haven't touched it in about a month, but I hope to resume work on it soon,
and have it done by the end of the month...
---
SF.Net email is sp
We could setup our own
I might be able to host / make
chris
Karl Lattimer wrote:
Can we not get a public gallery on freevo.org or at least a registered
users gallery
Would be cool to show off what we build publicly
Geert Decorte wrote:
Since everybody start posting pictures of his projec
Can we not get a public gallery on freevo.org or at least a registered
users gallery
Would be cool to show off what we build publicly
Geert Decorte wrote:
Since everybody start posting pictures of his project:
These are a few of mine.
http://gedeco.pointclark.net/gallery/freevo
Just happens
Since everybody start posting pictures of his project:
These are a few of mine.
http://gedeco.pointclark.net/gallery/freevo
Just happens to have the same amplifier as the original poster :)
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 08:37 -0700, ts North wrote:
Here is a fun project I
Direct link to RF stuff
www.chrisellis.me.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=10&Itemid=17
There is also some info on Manchester encoding on my site
Chris
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
fr
rol
> PDA?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Karl Lattimer
> Sent: 15 June 2005 11:24
> To: freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] VCRVO project
>
> That is cool, got some seriou
Lattimer
Sent: 15 June 2005 11:24
To: freevo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freevo-users] VCRVO project
That is cool, got some serious cool factor!
The RF remote seems interesting, do you have the circuit diagrams? IR is
good but RF would be so much better!
Karl,
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:17
That is cool, got some serious cool factor!
The RF remote seems interesting, do you have the circuit diagrams? IR is
good but RF would be so much better!
Karl,
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 11:17 +0100, Chris Ellis wrote:
> While were on the subject of hardware,
>
> What do people thik of my freevo Med
While were on the subject of hardware,
What do people thik of my freevo Media centre,
Custom built for my A-level project, has remote and every thing
www.chrisellis.me.uk//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=13&Itemid=6
Chris
---
SF.N
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 23:29 +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> however regardless of your rant, UTP carries a better signal. Thats why
> we use it in networking instead of coax, in networks we grew out of coax
> in the eighties apart from the odd ring of posterity.
I wouldn't dream of disputing that.
Jason Tackaberry wrote:
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 18:36 +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
Just for the information of the group, I once read a report on
different cabling methodologies and the results of the report were.
My own experience with A/V cables is a bit different. I personally
thi
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 18:36 +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote:
> Just for the information of the group, I once read a report on
> different cabling methodologies and the results of the report were.
My own experience with A/V cables is a bit different. I personally
think people who swear by expensive
A note on cables...
Just for the information of the group, I once read a report on
different cabling methodologies and the results of the report were.
The bandwidth of audio interconnect/rca type cables is poor at best
no matter what the length, metal or other marketing bull. The test
com
--- Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 08:37 -0700, ts North wrote:
> > Here is a fun project I just completed that
> involves
> > Freevo, a VCR and an old computer:
> >
> > http://www.northsecure.com/vcrvo/
>
> Cool! The jog shuttle knob looks like it got a
>
ts North wrote:
Here is a fun project I just completed that involves
Freevo, a VCR and an old computer:
http://www.northsecure.com/vcrvo/
This is awesome! I love hardware mods like this, I was going to hack up
an old VCR myself but chickened out. :)
Thanks for such a great application!
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 08:37 -0700, ts North wrote:
> Here is a fun project I just completed that involves
> Freevo, a VCR and an old computer:
>
> http://www.northsecure.com/vcrvo/
Cool! The jog shuttle knob looks like it got a little beat up. :) But
this is a really nice mod.
You say cable qu
25 matches
Mail list logo